Advanced Search Results

Solvis Energie India Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

be granted. 12.2. The petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy in terms of Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 wherein the petitioner can approach APTEL as against any order of the KERC. Whenever any statutory appeal is … 12.6. He relies upon the decision in KPTCL -v- Hassan Thermal Power Pvt. Limited9 3893/2019, more particularly para 48 and 49 thereof, which are reproduced hereunder for easy reference:8. [W.P. No.12576/2018 dt. 21.06.2018]. 9 WA37832019 - 30

P.Nachimuthu and ors. Vs. the District Collector and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 180, 68(1), 183, 176(2)(e); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 6 to 12; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 10

Central Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003: 27.Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line … appropriate Government. This Section has to be read with the definition of overhead line as provided under sub-clause 48 of Section 2. As discussed above, the definition of sub-section 48 of Section 2 would certainly exclude the

Simran Wind Project Private Limited and Others Vs. Tamil Nadu Electric ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

being arbitrary, illegal and ultra vires the powers of the TNERC and contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 and the applicable CERC regulations.) 1. The writ petitions have been filed to declare that the Tamil Nadu … of the State of U.P. (now the State of Uttarakhand). After an indepth consideration of the provisions of Section 48/49 of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948 under which the concessional tariff/rebate was granted and the provisions of section

Ahmedabad Electricity Company Limited Vs. Ramesh D. Devnani

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 297; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulations) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 226 and 227; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 15, 126, 126(1), 126(2), 127, 135 to 139, 145, 153, 153(1), 154(5), 185(2), 185(3) and 185(5); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 18, 21(2), 24, 37, 39, 39A, 40, 44, 53 and 67 to 69; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 69(1); Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Electricity Rules, 1956; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganisation and Regularisation) Act, 2003 - Sections 21; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879

Reported in : AIR2005Guj66; (2005)2GLR1202

conferred by or under this Act. The aforesaid section is to be read with section 153 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 153 of Electricity Act, 2003 reads as under:'153. Constitution of Special Courts- (1) The State Government may, for … injunction application before the trial court and the same has also been produced before this court at page 48 onwards at Annexure 'C' collectively. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that immediately

Jaiprakash Power Ventures Limited vs.union of India & Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

on fixed charges / capacity charges under the regime of electricity tariffs specifically under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 which provides for determination of tariff by a bidding process; (2) The decision to put a cap on … Noor, Mr Gyanesh Bhardwaj and Mr Shreshth Jain AND For the Respondent/UoI W.P.(C) Nos.37& Ors Page 1 of 48 + W.P.(C) No.4885/2015 & CM No.19739/2015 JAIPRAKASH POWER VENTURES LIMITED ...... Petitioner versus ...... RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA

Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited vs.malvinder Mohan Singh and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. SAW Pipes Ltd., 2003 (5) SCC705would have no application to foreign Awards. Reliance was also placed … dissenting award being given by Justice (Retd.) A.M.Ahmadi). By the present judgment, I will decide the objections under section 48 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the respective respondents to enforcement of the Award. Separate … Arbitration Act. He relies upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Renusagar Power Company Limited vs. General Electric Company, 1994 Supplementary 1 SCC644to contend that the scope of enquiry before a Court in which an Award

Nand Kishore Garg Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 108, 61, 62, 111

to the issues relating to the finalization of the tariff by the Commission under the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for brevity 2003 Act), the illegality committed by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) in … with the provisions of this Act and the regulations made in this behalf by the concerned State Commission." Section 48 deals with additional terms of supply. It is as follows: "48. Additional terms of supply. - A distribution

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court passed the following Order: 1. When the petition was filed Appellate Tribunal under Section 110 of the Electricity Act 2003 was not constituted. A tribunal has since been constituted under Section 110 of the Act. A notification has … and DISCOMs) during FY 2004- 05 as estimated by the Commission works out to Rs.1762 Crore which is 48% of revenue at existing tariffs. The committed support from the GNCTD for FY 2004-05 is Rs.690 Crore. After

Kovvuri Trinadha Reddy Late Sri Subba Reddy, Hindu Vs. Eastern Power D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 30, 61, 126, 126(3), 126(4), 126(5), 127, 127(6), 135, 135(1), 135(2), 135(4), 135 to 139, 147, 153, 153(1), 154, 154(5), 181, 183, 183(1), 185, 185(1) and 185(3); Electricity (Supply) Act 1948 - Sections 2(7), 2(17), 2(24), 2(39), 2(57), 2(58), 2(64), 2(70), 2(73), 5(1), 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 30, 42, 43, 45(1), 45(4), 47(1), 45, 48, 49, 49(4), 50, 53, 56, 56(1), 61, 62, 62(1), 62(3), 82(1), 82(2) and 86; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2(58); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 - Sections 49, 56 and 57; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Electricity Supply Code (first amendment) Regulations, 2005 - Regulations 5, 7A, 39, 39.2, 39.3 and 39.5; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2007(6)ALD752

Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., declared as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. When the matter came up for admission on 17.3.2006 the learned Single Judge, while examining the question, whether … all monies which may become due to him in respect of the electricity supplied to such person. Under Section 48, a distribution licensee may require any person, who seeks supply of electricity under Section 43, to accept any

Kovvuri Trinadha Reddy and ors. Vs. Eastern Power Distribution Corpora ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 13, 50, 56, 56(1), 56(3), 57, 61, 126, 126(2), 126(3), 126(4), 126(5), 127, 127(6), 135 to 139, 147, 153, 153(1), 154, 154(5), 181, 183, 183(1), 185, 185(1) and 185(3); Electricity (Supply) Act 1948 - Sections 2(7), 2(17), 2(24), 2(39), 2(57), 2(58), 2(64), 2(70), 2(73), 5(1), 12, 14, 15, 16, 30, 42, 43, 45(1), 45(4), 45(5), 47(1), 48, 49, 49(4), 53, 56(1), 61, 62, 62(1), 62(3), 82(1), 82(2) and 86; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; A.P. Electricity Reforms Act, 1998; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Electricity (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2005; Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Electricity Supply Code (first amendment) Regulations, 2005; Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(4)ALT580

Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., declared as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. When the matter came up for admission on 17-3-2006 the learned Single Judge, while examining the question, whether … all monies which may become due to him in respect of the electricity supplied to such person. Under Section 48, a distribution licensee may require any person, who seeks supply of electricity under Section 43, to accept any