Advanced Search Results
Tata Steel Ltd. and ors. Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors ...
Jharkhand
Sep-11-2007
Electricity
Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 56(1), 56(2), 62(2), 64, 64(2), 181, 185 and 185(2); Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 17, 22(1), 22(2), 29, 45, 82 and 85(1); Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 62(4); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Tariff) Regulations, 2003 - Regulations 20 and 21
AIR2008Jhar60; 2008(56)BLJR412; [2008(1)JCR580(Jhr)]
held that charging of tariff, which has not been approved by the JSERC, is an offence punishable Under Section 45 of the Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998.52. Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 also provides that the … supplementary bill(s) cannot be raised for a period beyond two years in view of Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003;(iv) to refund the amount, which was realized by the JSEB as against the supplementary bill(s) with interest [this
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. Reliance Energy Ltd. ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-14-2007
Electricity
Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(4), 3, 14, 16, 42, 42(5), 42(6), 45(5), 55(2), 57, 61, 62, 76, 76(1), 79, 79(1), 82, 83, 84, 85, 85(1), 86, 86(1), 86(2), 94, 96, 125, 126, 127, 128, 128(1), 128(5), 128(6), 129, 142, 143, 163 and 181; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity Supply Act, 1948; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 17; Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum and Ombudsman) Regulations, 2003
AIR2008SC976; 2007(4)AWC3662(SC); 2008(1)BomCR738; JT2007(10)SC365; 2007(10)SCALE279; (2007)8SCC381; [2007] 9 SCR 9
Civil Appeal No. 2846 of 20061. This appeal under Section 125 of the of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter for short 'the Act') is directed against the judgment and order dated 29th March, 2006 passed by … Order.By another order dated 23.8.2005 in the case of M/s. Prayas (Energy Group) Pune, the Commission in para 45 directed as under:45. Considering the foregoing, the Commission disposes of Prayas' petition with the following directions, which would
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Balamani and A. Saraswathi Vs. the District Magistrate and District ...
Chennai
Mar-14-2008
Electricity
Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 14, 35, 38(1) and 164; Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 16, 16(1) and 16(3); Electricity Supply Act - Sections 45; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 16, 18, 19 and 42; Works of Licensee Rules, 2006 - Rule 3(2); Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 233; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226
2008(2)CTC555; (2008)4MLJ22
directed the District Magistrate to consider the objections and pass orders in accordance with the provisions of the Electricity Act 2003 and the Telegraph Act 1885.(b) The petitioners again filed W.P.Nos.15739 of 2007 and 15740 of 2007 against the … scheme was approved, and it was also declared that the Board will exercise power of Telegraph Authority under Section 45 of the Electricity Supply Act, and, therefore, the Electricity Board shall not be bound by the provisions of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
R. Kannan Rep. by His Power Agent, K. Sivasubramanian Vs. Power Grid C ...
Chennai
Apr-04-2008
Property
Indian Telegraph Act, 1835 - Sections 16(1), 16(2), 10 to 19 and 35; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 14 and 164; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 16, 18 and 19; Electricity Supply Act - Sections 45; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 233; Woks of Licensees Rules, 2006; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 136, 226 and 227
(2008)4MLJ892
made a point that the Government of India, in exercise of powers conferred by Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, has passed an order dated 24.12.2003 to exercise all powers vested in the Telegraph Authority in respect of … scheme was approved, and it was also declared that the Board will exercise power of Telegraph Authority under Section 45 of the Electricity Supply Act, and, therefore, the Electricity Board shall not be bound by the provisions of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT. Narayanan Vs. the District Executive Magistrate-cum-district Collec ...
Chennai
Apr-04-2008
Civil
Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 16, 16(1), 16(2), 16(3) and 35; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 10 to 19 and 164; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956; Woks of Licensees Rules, 2006 - Rule 3(2); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 16, 18 and 19; Electricity Supply Act - Sections 45; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 188; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 136, 226 and 227
(2008)4MLJ1024
made a point that the Government of India, in exercise of powers conferred by Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, has passed an order dated 24.12.2003 to exercise all powers vested in the Telegraph Authority in respect of … scheme was approved, and it was also declared that the Board will exercise power of Telegraph Authority under Section 45 of the Electricity Supply Act, and, therefore, the Electricity Board shall not be bound by the provisions of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKovvuri Trinadha Reddy Late Sri Subba Reddy, Hindu Vs. Eastern Power D ...
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-27-2007
Electricity
Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 30, 61, 126, 126(3), 126(4), 126(5), 127, 127(6), 135, 135(1), 135(2), 135(4), 135 to 139, 147, 153, 153(1), 154, 154(5), 181, 183, 183(1), 185, 185(1) and 185(3); Electricity (Supply) Act 1948 - Sections 2(7), 2(17), 2(24), 2(39), 2(57), 2(58), 2(64), 2(70), 2(73), 5(1), 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 30, 42, 43, 45(1), 45(4), 47(1), 45, 48, 49, 49(4), 50, 53, 56, 56(1), 61, 62, 62(1), 62(3), 82(1), 82(2) and 86; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2(58); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 - Sections 49, 56 and 57; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Electricity Supply Code (first amendment) Regulations, 2005 - Regulations 5, 7A, 39, 39.2, 39.3 and 39.5; Constitution of India - Article 14
2007(6)ALD752
Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., declared as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. When the matter came up for admission on 17.3.2006 the learned Single Judge, while examining the question, whether … 9.7.2004, and Mallikarjuna Polishing Industries v. Chief Managing Director, Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd. Judgment in W.A. Nos. 452 and 477 of 2004 dated 11.3.2004, While the Division Bench, in Komarapu Chiranjeevulu, had held that, if the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKovvuri Trinadha Reddy and ors. Vs. Eastern Power Distribution Corpora ...
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-27-2007
Electricity
Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 13, 50, 56, 56(1), 56(3), 57, 61, 126, 126(2), 126(3), 126(4), 126(5), 127, 127(6), 135 to 139, 147, 153, 153(1), 154, 154(5), 181, 183, 183(1), 185, 185(1) and 185(3); Electricity (Supply) Act 1948 - Sections 2(7), 2(17), 2(24), 2(39), 2(57), 2(58), 2(64), 2(70), 2(73), 5(1), 12, 14, 15, 16, 30, 42, 43, 45(1), 45(4), 45(5), 47(1), 48, 49, 49(4), 53, 56(1), 61, 62, 62(1), 62(3), 82(1), 82(2) and 86; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; A.P. Electricity Reforms Act, 1998; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Electricity (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2005; Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Electricity Supply Code (first amendment) Regulations, 2005; Andhra Pradesh
2007(4)ALT580
Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., declared as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. When the matter came up for admission on 17-3-2006 the learned Single Judge, while examining the question, whether … dt.9-7-2004 and Mallikarjuna Polishing Industries v. Chief Managing Director, Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd. Judgment in W.A. Nos. 452 and 477 of 2004, dt.11-3-2004 While the Division Bench, in Komarapu Chiranjeevulu (1 supra), had held that, if
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovernment of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Others Vs. Union ...
Delhi
Aug-04-2016
Education
Viniyamak Bhavan, C-Block, Shivalik, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi - 110 017 Sub: Directions under Section 108 of the Electricity Act, 2003 regarding disruption in electricity supply to consumers and compensation payable in respect thereof. Sir, Considering the very large … 3(8), Section 3(60) - Government of NCT of Delhi Act, 1991 - Section 41, Section 44, Section 44(3), Section 45 - States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Government ofIndia Act 1935 - Section 94(3) -Government of Union Territories Act,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDamodar Valley Corporation Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Nov-23-2007
MRTP
the fourth proviso to Section 14 and effect of Sections 61, 62 and the relevant provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short Act of 2003) on the provisions of the DVC Act, 1948 having a bearing on the … research institutions or any person carrying on the business of any architect, an engineer or a contractor.100. Also Section 45 of the DVC Act provides the following activities which are to be included in the Annual Report: These
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNand Kishore Garg Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Delhi
May-23-2011
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 108, 61, 62, 111
to the issues relating to the finalization of the tariff by the Commission under the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for brevity 2003 Act), the illegality committed by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) in … stipulates the duties of distribution licensees and open access. Section 43 deals with duty to supply on request. Section 45 provides the power to recover charges. The said provision refers to fixation of tariff. It reads as follows:
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »