Advanced Search Results

Abhay Tyagi Vs. State (Delhi Admn.) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 18, 37, 39, 53 and 67 to 69; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379, 419, 420, 467 and 468; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 50, 61, 121, 126, 126(6), 135 to 138, 151, 154, 154(5), 155, 174, 183, 185, 185(2) and 332; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 69(1); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 322, 332, 466A, 467 and 469; Delhi Electricity Rules Act, 2005; Delhi Electricity Reforms Commission Act, 2000; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 4, 4(2), 154, 173, 190(1), 195, 195(1), 200, 340 and 482; Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commissions (Performance standards, metering and billing) Regulation, 2002 -

Reported in : 2009LC(DEL)32

case may also be passed. 3. It is the submission of the petitioner that after the enactment of Electricity Act 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the New Act) which repealed the Indian Electricity Act 1910 as well as Delhi … that the petitioner indulged in the theft of electricity and, therefore, he was liable to be punished under Section 39 of the Indian Electricity Act 1910 (now, Section 135 of the New Act) read with Section 379 of

Anil Kumar Bhuinya Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39 and 135 to 150; ;Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 135 to 140, 153, 154, 185, 185(2) and 185(5); ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 6; ;Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; ;Evidence Act - Section 113A; ;Indian Electricity (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 2001 - Sections 39F, 39G, 39G(2) and 39P; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 379; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 2006(1)CHN672

24th April, 2003. The Electricity (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 2001 came into force prior to introduction of Indian Electricity Act, 2003. Section 39F of the West Bengal Amendment Act lays down formation or constitution of Special Courts. Section 39G of … I.E. Act Case No. 231/04 arising out of Daspur P.S. Case No. 127/96 for alleged offence punishable under Section 39 of the I.E. Act, 1910 read with Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code (in short IPC) and

The Assistant Executive Engineer, Distribution/Rural, Tamil Nadu Elect ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39(1), 44(1) and 185; Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 151, 153 and 154; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 135 to 139, 260(1), 262, 263 to 265, 307, 308 and 313

Reported in : 2009LC(MAD)782

revision petitioner has repeatedly contended that the first appellate Court has rendered its judgment on 30.12.2003 and the Electricity Act, 2003 has come into force on 10.06.2003 and therefore, on the date of pronouncement of the judgment by the … the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board. Under the said circumstances, the accused is said to have committed offences under Sections 39(1) and 44(1)(aa) of the Electricity Act, 1910.3. On receipt of Ex.P1, the investigating agency has done investigation

Prabir Kumar Mondal Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39(1) and 44; ;West Bengal Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2001; ;Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2003 - Section 135; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 216; ;Constitution of India - Article 20(1)

Reported in : 2007(4)CHN833

was taken by the learned Magistrate on 29.9.2003. The Indian Electricity Act, 1910 has been repealed and the Electricity Act, 2003 came with effect from 10.6.2003. In view of Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the said Indian … G.R. Case No. 214 of 2003 arising out of Sonamukhi P.S. Case No. 37 of 2003 under Sections 39(1)(b)(c) and 44 of the Indian Electricity Act pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bishnupur, Bankura.3. It

S.A. Hakim Vs. The District Collector, Dindigul and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Transmission Licensee in the capacity of State Transmission Utility as envisaged under Sections 39 and 40 of Indian Electricity Act, 2003 (in short '2003 Act'). Under Section 164 of the 2003 Act, the appropriate Government (the State Government herein)

C.V. Raghavaiah and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Finance Departme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Indian Electricity (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2000; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39 to 49 and 49D; Constitution of India - Article 14; Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (Salaries and Allowances and Conditions of Services of Chairman, Vice Chairman and Members) (Amendment) Rules, 1989 - Rules 8 and 12(2); ;Indian Electricity Act, 2003; Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Special Court Chairman and Members (Conditions of Service Rules) 1996 - Rule 3; Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (Salaries and Allowances and Conditions of Services of Chairman, Vice Chairman and Members) Rules, 1988 - Rule 8; Land Grabbbing (Prohibition) Act

Reported in : 2005(3)ALT435

discrimination in paying pension equivalent to APAT Members. Further, specific stand taken that pursuant to the provisions of Electricity Act, 2003 which came into effect from 10-1-2003, G.O.Ms. No. 118 Energy (Power-ll) Department, dated 18-10-2003 was issued whereby under … 2000 under Section 49d(i) of Indian Electricity Act, 1910, was provided for speedy enquiry into alleged offences under Section 39 - 49 of the aforesaid Act, vide G.O.Ms.No. 98 Energy (PR.II) Department, dated 17-10-2000. Pursuant thereto, the Government

Dr. Makrand Balkrishna Patwardhan Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

Bihar and others, the compounding is permissible. According to him, in the matter of compounding, provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, there is a specific provision as regards compounding, in view of the Section 152 of the said Act. … on behalf of respondent No.2 in the matter of theft of electrical energy, suffered prosecution under the provisions Section 39, 44 and 50 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 and amended in 1986 (for short "said Act"). Pursuant

Kovvuri Trinadha Reddy Late Sri Subba Reddy, Hindu Vs. Eastern Power D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 30, 61, 126, 126(3), 126(4), 126(5), 127, 127(6), 135, 135(1), 135(2), 135(4), 135 to 139, 147, 153, 153(1), 154, 154(5), 181, 183, 183(1), 185, 185(1) and 185(3); Electricity (Supply) Act 1948 - Sections 2(7), 2(17), 2(24), 2(39), 2(57), 2(58), 2(64), 2(70), 2(73), 5(1), 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 30, 42, 43, 45(1), 45(4), 47(1), 45, 48, 49, 49(4), 50, 53, 56, 56(1), 61, 62, 62(1), 62(3), 82(1), 82(2) and 86; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2(58); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 - Sections 49, 56 and 57; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Electricity Supply Code (first amendment) Regulations, 2005 - Regulations 5, 7A, 39, 39.2, 39.3 and 39.5; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2007(6)ALD752

Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., declared as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. When the matter came up for admission on 17.3.2006 the learned Single Judge, while examining the question, whether … or criminal prosecution/determination of civil liability under Section 154 of the Act. Learned Counsel would contend that Clause 39, of the terms and conditions of supply made under Section 49(4) of the Electricity (Supply) Act 1948, is

Kovvuri Trinadha Reddy and ors. Vs. Eastern Power Distribution Corpora ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 13, 50, 56, 56(1), 56(3), 57, 61, 126, 126(2), 126(3), 126(4), 126(5), 127, 127(6), 135 to 139, 147, 153, 153(1), 154, 154(5), 181, 183, 183(1), 185, 185(1) and 185(3); Electricity (Supply) Act 1948 - Sections 2(7), 2(17), 2(24), 2(39), 2(57), 2(58), 2(64), 2(70), 2(73), 5(1), 12, 14, 15, 16, 30, 42, 43, 45(1), 45(4), 45(5), 47(1), 48, 49, 49(4), 53, 56(1), 61, 62, 62(1), 62(3), 82(1), 82(2) and 86; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; A.P. Electricity Reforms Act, 1998; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Electricity (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2005; Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Electricity Supply Code (first amendment) Regulations, 2005; Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(4)ALT580

Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., declared as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. When the matter came up for admission on 17-3-2006 the learned Single Judge, while examining the question, whether … criminal prosecution/ determination of civil liability under Section 154 of the Act. Learned Counsel would contend that Clause 39, of the terms and conditions of supply made under Section 49(4) of the Electricity (Supply) Act 1948, is

A.P. Gas Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commis ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2, 2(8), 2(10), 2(22), 2(28), 2(29), 2(30), 2(32), 2(36), 2(49), 2(50), 2(67), 2(75), 9, 9(1), 9(2), 14, 39, 39(1), 39(2), 39(4), 40, 42, 42(2), 49, 62(1), 76 to 109, 158, 176, 181, 391 and 391(2); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998; Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Andhra Pradesh Act, 2003; Electricity Rules, 2005 - Rule 3

Reported in : AIR2006AP12; 2005(6)ALD368

O.P.(SR) No. 19 of 2004 was filed by A.P. Transmission Corporation Limited (A.P.TRANSCO) under Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (the Act, for brevity) seeking orders from APERC to direct APGPCL to allocate surrendered energy to A.P.TRANSCO from … generating company for the purpose of pro rata sharing of power is not part of its duties/functions under Section 39(2) of the Act. The relationship between the petitioner and second respondent is that of a company and its