Advanced Search Results
Hassan Thermal Power Pvt. Ltd., Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Sep-27-2019
Arbitration
the said Ordinance shall be deemed to have been done or taken under this Act. 28 defines Generating Electricity Act, 2003 Section 2 relates to definitions Sub-Section Company which reads as under:-"Generating Company means any company or body corporate or … LIMITED Vs KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION decided on 21.06.2018 in W.P.Nos.12576/2018 and connected matters (paras.28 to 30 and 35).28. This Court while considering the provisions of Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 in the case of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Executive Engineer KPTCL, Major and Another Vs. Doddakka
Karnataka
Aug-06-2014
Land Acquisition
the compensation and also for assessing the value of the trees cut and removed. Even as per The Electricity Act, 2003, Section 68 provides for removal of shrubs, trees and other such growth if they are likely to affect overhead … the time when the transmission line was drawn. Life span of the coconut tree has been taken as 35 years. Yield of coconuts per coconut tree per annum has been taken as 80 coconuts and price of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAkanksha International Through Its Proprietor Mrs. Anju Suryaprakash D ...
Mumbai
Sep-05-2007
Electricity
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 5, 13, 13(2), 13(4) and 35; Electricity Act, 2002; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 43 and 50; Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 32G; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 39; Debt Recovery Act; Contract Act; Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code - Sections 169; Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply Code and Other Conditions of Supply) Regulations, 2005 - Regulation 10.5
2007(6)ALLMR611; 2007(5)BomCR481; (2007)109BOMLR1959; 2008(1)MhLj753
entitled to deny new electricity connection to the petitioner. Reliance was also placed on Section 43 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which lays down that every distribution licensee, shall, on an application by the owner or occupier of any … under the Contract Act and does not create any charge on property under the Securitisation Act, 2002. Hence Section 35 of the Securitisation Act, 2002 does not override the provisions of Section 38 of the Bombay Sales Tax
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
T.M.Thangaraj Vs. the Assistant Electricity Engineer
Chennai
Nov-09-2011
Environment
Tamil Nadu Regulation of Wood Based Industries Rules, 2010; Tamil Nadu Forests Act, 1882 - Sections 26, 35, 63; Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 43
rules, as prayed for by the TNEB, the Regulatory Commission merely clarified that despite Section 43 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Electricity Board cannot issue service connection to Saw Mills, which did not have a proper license from … 2010 with effect from 21.10.2010. The rules were issued in exercise of the powers conferred by Sections 26, 35 and 63 of the Tamil Nadu Forests Act, 1882.5. It is interesting to note that the prohibitory order
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKirloskar Electric Co Ltd Vs. The State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-10-2018
Land Acquisition
omissions?. (ii) What is the true meaning and purport of Section 10(3) of the KVAT Act, 2003 vis-à-vis Section 35 of the same Act, 2003?. Date of Judgment 10-01-2018 W.P.Nos.58917-58928/2016 and Connected Matters Kirloskar Electric Co. Ltd. & … passed by the 2nd Respondent under Section 39(1) read with Section 36(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, for the tax periods April 2009 to March 2010 are ex facie illegal and unsustainable & etc., W.P.Nos.26349-26360/2017: … W.P.Nos.26899-26910/2017, W.P.Nos.27451/2017 & Date of Judgment 10-01-2018 W.P.Nos.58917-58928/2016 and Connected Matters Kirloskar Electric Co. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. The State of Karnataka & Ors. 2/123
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Balamani and A. Saraswathi Vs. the District Magistrate and District ...
Chennai
Mar-14-2008
Electricity
Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 14, 35, 38(1) and 164; Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 16, 16(1) and 16(3); Electricity Supply Act - Sections 45; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 16, 18, 19 and 42; Works of Licensee Rules, 2006 - Rule 3(2); Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 233; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226
2008(2)CTC555; (2008)4MLJ22
directed the District Magistrate to consider the objections and pass orders in accordance with the provisions of the Electricity Act 2003 and the Telegraph Act 1885.(b) The petitioners again filed W.P.Nos.15739 of 2007 and 15740 of 2007 against the … issue is that relating to administrative matters; otherwise that rule will have to be considered as ultra vires Section 35 of the Act.(iii) : 1990CriLJ2148a S.N. Mukherjee v. Union of India:35. Reasons, when recorded by an administrative authority
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT. Narayanan Vs. the District Executive Magistrate-cum-district Collec ...
Chennai
Apr-04-2008
Civil
Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 16, 16(1), 16(2), 16(3) and 35; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 10 to 19 and 164; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956; Woks of Licensees Rules, 2006 - Rule 3(2); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 16, 18 and 19; Electricity Supply Act - Sections 45; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 188; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 136, 226 and 227
(2008)4MLJ1024
made a point that the Government of India, in exercise of powers conferred by Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, has passed an order dated 24.12.2003 to exercise all powers vested in the Telegraph Authority in respect of … issue is that relating to administrative matters; otherwise that rule will have to be considered as ultra vires Section 35 of the Act. (iii) : 1990CriLJ2148a , S.N. Mukherjee v. Union of India:34. The decisions of this Court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Represented ...
Chennai
Sep-14-2012
Land Acquisition
that the CERC, in exercise of the powers conferred, under Section 178, read with Section 79(1)(C) of the Electricity Act, 2003, had issued the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Unscheduled Interchange Charges and Related Matters) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012, hereinafter … the consumer demands in the State, by procuring sufficient power from the various power generating and transmitting agencies. 35. It has also been stated that the main objective of the impugned regulations is to encourage sale of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn the Matter Of: Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. Gujarat Vs. Gujarat ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
May-31-2011
Electricity
is applicable only to purchase of power to the extent of meeting the minimum specified obligation under the Electricity Act, 2003. 13 In reply to the above contention, the Learned Counsel for 2nd Respondent vehemently submitted that the State … statutory tariff order dated 11th Aug 2006 passed by the State Commission while discharging its statutory function under section 62 and 86 of the Electricity Act 2003. II. The generation tariff determined by the State Commission was … of the Commission on this issue. The first issue is answered accordingly. 35. Next question to be decided as to Whether Government’s Amendment to 2007
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Chennai Vs. M ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
Jul-10-2013
Electricity
Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »