Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: electricity act 2003 section 33 · Page 1 of about 3,023 results (0.085 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 30 2012

The Tata Power Company Limited, Rep. by B.J. Shroff Vs. Maharashtra El ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-30-2012

Subject : Electricity

the High Court that it had refused the scheduling of appellant’s generation in exercise of its power under section 33 (1) of the Electricity Act,2003 in public interest. Again, in its earlier affidavit in reply dated 9.07.2010 the … MERC, to kindly issue further instructions to SLDC Kalwa for scheduling power as per the provisions in the Electricity Act,2003” 5. In this situation the appellant filed a writ application on 19.05.2010 before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 2008

The Assistant Executive Engineer (Electricl), Karnataka Electricity Bo ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-01-2008

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 126, 127 and 145; Karnataka Electricity Board Electricity Supply Rules - Rules 2.33 and 46.01; Karnataka Electricity Board Electricity Supply Regulations, 1988

Reported in : 2009(2)KarLJ504:2009(1)KCCR436; 2009(2)AIRKarR95; 2009(2)KLJ504:2009(1)KCCR436;

maintainable, as rightly held by the trial court. The learned Counsel referred to the relevant Sections of the Electricity Act, 2003 as well as to the Karnataka Electricity Board Electricity Supply Regulations, 1988 ('Regulations, 1988 in short') to submit … given aggrieved party a right to appeal before Appellate Authority provided under Regulations. INDIAN ELECTRICITY ACT (30 OF 2003) Section 126 & Karnataka Electricity Board Electricity Supply Regulations (1988) Regulation 2.33: [V. Jagannathan, J] Demand made on behalf

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2007

Central Power Distribution Co. and ors. Vs. Central Electricity Regula ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-17-2007

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 79(1); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 2(32), 28, 28(1), 28(2), 28(3), 29, 33, 33(3), 79(1), 86, 86(1) and 178(2); Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 15

Reported in : AIR2007SC2912; 2007(2)BLJR2461; JT2007(10)SC238; 2007(10)SCALE72; (2007)8SCC197

provided in the order of the CERC by its order dated 4.1.2000 be implemented under the provisions of Electricity Act, 2003, particularly when there is no provision under the statute that allows the CERC to levy Unscheduled Interchange Charges? … operation. It also provides that the State Load Dispatch center shall duly enforce such directions. Sub-section (3) of Section 33 of the Act provides that the State Load Dispatch center shall comply with the directions of the Regional

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 26 2010

Gmr Energy Limited a Company Incorporated Under the Provisions of Comp ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-26-2010

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(5), 2(15), 2(19), 2(23), 2(28), 2(29), 2(30), 2(33), 2(39), 2(47), 2(70), 2(72), 3, 6, 7, 8, 8(3), 9, 10, 10(2), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 12 to 24, 25 to 41, 42 to 60, 61 to 66, 73, 79, 86(1), 108(1) and 178; ;Companies Act; ;Indian Electricity Act, 1910; ;Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; ;Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; ;Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2007; ;Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 301, 302, 303 and 304; ;Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (Power Procurement from Renewable Sources for Distribution Licensee) Regulations, 2004; ;Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Open Access in inter-State Transmission) Regulations, 2008 - Regulations 6, 9, 14, 15 and 28

to finer aspects of the National Policy on Power which finds statutory recognition and as reflected in the Electricity Act, 2003 and its ramifications, in so far as the obligation of the Government to encourage private sector participation, delicensing … these Writ Petitions the petitioners are challenging the Government Order dated 30.12.2008 passed by the State Government under Section 11 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') directing them to operate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 2008

A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. R.V.K. Energy Pvt. Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-16-2008

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 13, 13(4), 13(5), 14, 14(1), 14(4), 15, 15(1), 16, 17, 21, 21(4), 26, 39 and 41(1); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4)(A), 2(5), 2(6), 3, 18A, 18A(2), 26A, 43A and 43A(1); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 3 and 28; Indian Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 10(2), 14 and 42(2); Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Reform Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 14, 14(1), 16, 33 and 37(1); Electricity (Removal of Difficulties) Second Order, 2005; Electricity (Supply) Rules; Indian Electricity Rules; Companies Act, 1956; ;Indian Electricity Regulations

Reported in : 2008LC(SC)550; JT2008(7)SC138; 2008(9)SCALE529; 2008AIRSCW6536

and powers of the licensees. Section 21 imposes restrictions on licensees and generating companies.77. The Parliament enacted Indian Electricity Act, 2003 (in short 2003 Act). Sub-section (2) of Section 10 of the said Act enables a generating company to … view of this finding the High Court held that the dispute is arbitrable under Section 37(1) read with Section 33 of the Reform Act, 1995. It is not seriously disputed that ICCL after a long-drawn correspondence with the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2009

Tata Power Company Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commiss ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-2009

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3, 5, 12, 22(1), 22B and 22B(1); Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(17), 2(4), 2(70), 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 10(3), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 12, 12(2), 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 33, 55(2), 55(3), 42, 42(2), 60, 62(1), 62(2), 62(95), 73, 76(1), 81(1), 81(2), 82, 83, 86, 86(1), 125, 128(1), 128(6), 128(7), 128(8), 129 and 181; Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1959; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 22(1) and 22; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 43, 43A, 44, 46 and 49; Reforms Act; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Income and Corporation Taxes Act, 1970 - Sections 488; Companies Act - Sections 255 and 256; Constitution of India - Article 19(1); MERC (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulati

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR2966; 2009LC(SC)246; 2009(5)LC2440(SC)

view of the prevailing supply shortage situation, the Commission has invoked its powers under Section 23 of the Electricity Act 2003, and has directed the distribution licensees to share the available generation capacity in a particular ratio, based on … etc. of generation and/or generating companies, namely -(i) Section 10(3) (ii) Section 11(2) (iii) Section 23 (iv) Section 33(2) (v) Section 55(2) and (3) (vi) Section 60 (vii) Section 62(1), (2) and (95) (viii) Section 81(1)(a), (b),

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2011

In the Matter Of: Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. Gujarat Vs. Gujarat ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-31-2011

Subject : Electricity

is applicable only to purchase of power to the extent of meeting the minimum specified obligation under the Electricity Act, 2003. 13 In reply to the above contention, the Learned Counsel for 2nd Respondent vehemently submitted that the State … statutory tariff order dated 11th Aug 2006 passed by the State Commission while discharging its statutory function under section 62 and 86 of the Electricity Act 2003. II. The generation tariff determined by the State Commission was … No. 2 of 2006 and inconsistent with the relevant legal provisions. …” 33. From the above findings it is noticed that the State Commission has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 2006

U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. Northern Region Load Despatch

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Sep-28-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL520

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2013

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Chennai Vs. M ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : Jul-10-2013

Subject : Electricity

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2012

M/S. Abraham Memorial Educational Trust and Others Vs. C. Suresh Babu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-07-2012

Subject : Education

Goa Coaching Classes (Regulation) Act, 2001; Section 17(2)(a) of The Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity Act, 2003; Section 23(2)(a) of The Tamil Nadu Groundwater (Development and Management) Act, 2003; Section 10(1)(a) of The Tamil Nadu Schools … 25 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, Section 22-C of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Section 33 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 85 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial