Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: electricity act 2003 section 27 · Page 1 of about 4,793 results (0.080 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 26 2016

V.B.R. Menon Vs. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Chennai and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Jul-26-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

impugned Final Assessment Order No.AEE/OandM/Porur/F.APTS/D.No.105/15-16, dated 02.06.2015 passed by the 1st respondent, under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and to quash the same and consequently, to direct the respondents to … Vimal Menon paid the said Compounding Fee of Rs.4,000/- on 26.05.2015 and provisional assessment fee of Rs.52,239/- on 27.05.2015. On receipt of the impugned notice of the Provisional Assessment and Compounding Fee, the petitioner's son sent the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2009

Ptc India Ltd. Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Thr. Its ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-06-2009

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 14(1), 14A(7), 14(2), 18(5), 26(1), 27 and 77; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 60, 61, 62, 66, 79, 79(1), 79(3), 111, 121, 178, 178(2) and 179; Indian Companies Act, 1913; Trade Marks Act - Sections 76; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 108; Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Fixation of Trading Margin) Regulations, 2006

Reported in : 2009(2)LHSC1037; 2009AIRSCW2946; 2009LC(SC)489; JT2009(3)SC564; 2009(3)SCALE845; (2009)5SCC466; 2009(3)LC1543(SC)

(supra) has no application to the present case. The Regulations have been framed under Section 178 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (in short `2003 Act'). It is pointed out that there is conceptual difference between the provisions which have … in the said decision was to the effect that the High Court sitting as an Appellate Court under Section 27 of the Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 (in short `1998 Act') has no jurisdiction to go into the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2012

M/S. Sri Kanaka Durga Castings (P) Ltd, Pondicherry Rep by Managing Di ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-09-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

in the Minutes of the proceedings, the 1st respondent had compounded the offence under Section 152 of the Electricity Act, 2003 vide Letter No.1385/ED/EE-II/F.SKDC/2012-13 dated 26.06.2012, calling upon the petitioner to pay Rupees Seven Crores. (viii) As the respondent … metering cubicle yard to an extent of 5m height. A second Inspection was conducted by HTM wing on 27.03.2012 along with officers of the Anti-power theft squad. It was certified that: (a) The genuineness of the number

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 12 2008

Citizen Forum Through Its Secretary Shri Rajiv S/O Gajanan Jagtap, Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-12-2008

Subject : Contract

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(27), 2(49), 3, 3(1), 3(4), 5, 12, 13, 14, 43, 73, 82, 86(2) and 181; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Right to Information Act (RTI); Maharashtra Essential Services Maintenance Act, 2005 - Sections 2; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 21, 39 and 226; Electricity Rules; Electricity Regulations; Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (General Conditions for Distribution Licensee) Regulations, 2006 - Regulation 8.3.7

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR598; 2008LC(BOM)309

whole process is not in the public interest, same is also not consistent with the object of The Electricity Act, 2003 (for short, hereafter referred to as the Act of 2003.) and the petitioners in prayer Clause (1) of … Section 5 that it would be appropriate to consider the provisions of Section 5 of the Act of 2003. Section 5 is merely a Section relating to formation of policy in rural areas and the said Section is … was dismissed by this Court by passing a detailed speaking order on 27.8.2007 wherein this Court held that there was no lack of transparency in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2004

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regula ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-11-2004

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 17(5), 27 and 29; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 45, 49 and 59

Reported in : AIR2004Bom294; 2004(3)BomCR485

State is now bound to make good the loss by subsidy under Section 65 of the Electricity Supply Act, 2003. The Commission has recorded a finding of fact that both the appellant Board and consumers are responsible for … tariff. The reasoned order was pronounced on 10th January, 2002 which is impugned in this Appeal filed under Section 27 of the ERC Act.2. We would first consider the points arising in Appeal No. 4 of 2002 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2009

Binani Zinc Limited Vs. Kerala State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-19-2009

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 43A(2), 46, 49, 56, 57, 57A, 57B, 59 and 79; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 2, 3, 17, 17(1), 22, 27, 28, 29, 29(1), 29(2), 29(6), 51, 52, 57 and 61; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 185; Indian Electricity Act 1910; Electricity (Supply) (Amendment) Act, 1998; Electricity (Supply) Rules; Electricity (Supply) Regulation; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226; Kerala State Electricity Board Extra High Tension Tariff Revision Order, 2002

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW2458; 2009LC(SC)1; JT2009(5)SC162; 2009(3)SCALE849; (2009)11SCC244; 2009(3)LC1474(SC)

examine whether the revision conforms to Section 29 of the 1998 Act or not.11. The Parliament enacted the Electricity Act, 2003 which came into force with effect from 10th June, 2003.12. The KSERC in terms of its order dated … and EHT categories was around 43%.13. The appeal was preferred thereagainst before the High Court in terms of Section 27 of the 1998 Act whereupon by an order dated 2nd July, 2004 it was directed:(a) Though the Tariff

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2005

Suresh Jindal Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-14-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 - Sections 14; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3 to 11, 12 to 18, 26, 28, 36(2), 37, 40, 49A, 50, 51, 53, 60 and 67 to 69; Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1956; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5 to 18, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 69(1), 72, 73 and 75 to 83; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 20, 26, 26(6), 55, 53, 70, 76, 79 and 185(3); Electricity Act, 1887; Electricity Act, 1903; Electricity Laws (Amendment) Act, 1998; Electricity Regulation Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 13, 22, 28 and 29; Electricity Reforms Act; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 - Sections 3 to 11, 12, 14, 15, 19 to 27, 63 and 63(3); Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1947; Bureau of Indian Sta

Reported in : 126(2006)DLT49

Rules, 1956 and the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948.(d) Whether till regulations are framed under Section 55 of the Electricity Act, 2003 by the authority, the distribution company has authority to determine what would be a correct meter.27. The aforesaid

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2011

Ms.Vishnuvardhan Paper Mills Pvt Ltd. Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-23-2011

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004 - Regulation 27(1); Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, 2004; Companies Act, 1956; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 43(1), 2(15)

in the writ petition, it is necessary to have a bird's eye view of the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 and the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code and Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code.8. Section 43(1) of the Electricity … respondent has relied upon Regulation 17(8) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code read with Regulations 5(2)(iv) and 27(1) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code.6. The short question that arises for consideration is as to whether

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 2008

Uttar Pradesh Power Corpn. Limited and Another Vs. Noida Power Corpn. ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-12-2008

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2016

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Others Vs. Union ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-04-2016

Subject : Education

Viniyamak Bhavan, C-Block, Shivalik, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi - 110 017 Sub: Directions under Section 108 of the Electricity Act, 2003 regarding disruption in electricity supply to consumers and compensation payable in respect thereof. Sir, Considering the very large … MARG, DELHI. No.F.1(1953)/Regn.Br./Div.Com/HQ/2014/191 dated 4th August, 2015 No.F.1(1953)/Regn.Br./Div.Com/HQ/2014 - In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section(3) of Section 27 the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899) and rule 4 of the Delhi Stamp (Prevention of Under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial