Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: electricity act 2003 section 22 · Page 1 of about 5,186 results (0.205 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 25 2009

Venkateshwara Alloys (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Goa and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-25-2009

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2(1), 21, 22, 22A, 22B, 23, 24, 24(1), 51A and 53; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 56, 56(1) and 185(2); Electricity Rules - Rules 29 and 31; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2009Bom106

tendered; and such position of law continues to exist in the analogus provisions under Section 56 of the Electricity Act, 2003; and as such under both the laws old as well as new there is no provision for permanent … is manly by way of relieving the licensee of the obligation on him to be found contained in Section 22 namely to make supply of electricity on application to all consumers within the area of supply.13. Obviously, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2008

Tata Power Company Limited Vs. Reliance Energy Limited and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-08-2008

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 22, 22(1) and 22(2); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2 and 21(2); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(15), 2(17), 2(61), 14, 14(2), 42, 42(2), 43, 60, 62(1) and 79(2); Electricity Act, 1903 - Sections 2 and 4(1); Indian Factories Act, 1881; Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 3(10); Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (Distribution, open access), Regulations, 2005 - Regulation 3

Reported in : 2008LC(SC)527; 2008(9)SCALE824; (2008)10SCC321

economy in the activities of the electricity industry to achieve the objects and purposes of the Act. The Electricity Act, 2003, which has replaced the ERC Act after hearings in this case were concluded, also specifically refers to the … by M/s BSES Limited on 23.7.2002 before the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'MERC'), under Section 22(2)(e) and (n) of the Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 (hereinafter referred to as 'the ERC Act'), complaining

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2008

Mula Pravara Electric Vs. Maharashtra Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Jan-28-2008

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL135

engaged in distribution of electricity in a rural area under cooperative principles, in the manner envisaged in The Electricity Act, 2003 and the Rural Electrification Policy dated August 23, 2006 issued by the Central Government and thereafter direct that … ARR of the appellant in case No. 51 of 2005.32. Learned Counsel for the Commission submitted that under Section 22 of the repealed Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998, as well as under Section 61 read with Section 86

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 26 2009

G.V.S. Rama Krishna and ors. Vs. A.P. Transco Rep. by Its Managing Dir ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-26-2009

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 57(2), 67 to 69, 164, 185 and 185(2); Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 19, 37, 51 and 53; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 28, 29, 29(2), 42, 42(1), 42(2), 69(1) and 69(2); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956

Reported in : AIR2009AP158; 2009(3)ALT502; 2009LC(AP)517

came into force w.e.f. 10.06.2003.9. The material on record shows that in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Government of A.P. issued G.O.Ms. No. 115, Energy PR.III, dated 07-10-2003 … lines through the lands of the petitioners as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003.3. It is pleaded by the petitioners that originally a 400 KV line under Vijayawada Power Transmission Scheme was … the law. It is further explained that since the existing line of 220 KV would be dismantled after the new line is laid, no damage

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2008

T.S.T. Kaznavi Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Rep. by Its Chairman,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-28-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(17), 2(28), 2(29), 2(32), 2(67), 2(72), 2(73), 2(77), 39(1), 67(2), 68, 164, 173, 174, 175, 185 and 185(2); Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 16, 16(1) and 16(3); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 12 to 19 and 51; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 42 and 51; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; The Works of Licensees Rules, 2006; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 188

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ703

has filed counter affidavit. According to the respondent Electricity Board, as per Sections 164 and 185(2)(a) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Board has the power of the 'Telegraph Authority' under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, with regard to … Act.2. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board has filed counter affidavit. According to the respondent Electricity Board, as per Sections 164 and 185(2)(a) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Board has the power of the 'Telegraph Authority' under … said Board proceedings is as follows:TECHNICAL BRANCHPermanent B.P.(CH)No. 410 Dated: 07.09.2006.Viya, Aavani. 22,Thiruvalluvar Aandu 2037.READ: Chairman's approval dated 03.09.2006.PROCEEDINGS:1. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board hereby

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2016

V.B.R. Menon Vs. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Chennai and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Jul-26-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

impugned Final Assessment Order No.AEE/OandM/Porur/F.APTS/D.No.105/15-16, dated 02.06.2015 passed by the 1st respondent, under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and to quash the same and consequently, to direct the respondents to … (Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2010

Binani Zinc Ltd. Vs. Kerala State Electricity Board

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Jun-03-2010

Subject : Electricity

Member 1. The Appellant in appeal No. 07/2008 seeks to have a review under Section 120 of the Electricity Act, 2003 of the order of this Tribunal dated 20/11/2009 on the grounds as will be evident in the succeeding … 2. The Respondent No. 1, Kerala State Electricity Board filed two truing up Petitions being No. 20/2006 and 22/2006 dated 20.6.2006 and 19/10/2006 respectively before the Respondent No. 2 herein Kerala State Electricity Regulatory Commission. In the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 2006

Ashoka Smokeless Coal Ind. P. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-01-2006

Subject : CommercialConstitution

Acts : Defence of India Rules; Colliery Control Order, 1945; Colliery Control Rules; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 2, 3(1), 3(2), 22 and 29; Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972; Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 4A and 9(3); Coal Mines (Conservation and Development) Act; Colliery Control (Amendment) Order, 2000; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 19, 19(1), 37, 39, 43, 77 and 298; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49; Kerala Industrial Establishments (National and Festival Holidays) (Amendment) Act, 1990; Coal Mines (Nationalisation) (Amendment) Act, 1976; CVC Act, 2003 - Sections 8(1); Industrial (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Sales Tax Rules - Rule 28A; Uttar Pr

Reported in : 2007(1)CTLJ1(SC); JT2007(1)SC125; 2006(13)SCALE102; (2007)2SCC640; 2007(2)KCCRSN91; (2007) 13 SCC154

found that as in the North Eastern Region, there was shortage of electricity, the traders and linked consumers would find it difficult to bid through … The coal companies state that such a direction was made in terms of Section 8(1)(h) of the CVC Act, 2003. It was recommended that wherever it is feasible and practical the organization should eventually switch over to the … Article 14 can arise in these cases. The Government's power to sell the exclusive privileges set out in Section 22 was not denied. It was also not disputed that those privileges could be sold by public auction. Public

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2011

Khushal Singh Vs. Punjab State Electricity Board and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-02-2011

Subject : Miscellaneous

contemplates is an adjudication in relation to an assessment before a Settlement Committee. Section 151- B of the Electricity Act, 2003 reads as follows:- "Notwithstanding anything contained in the Criminal Procedure Procedure, 1973, an offence punishable under sections 135 … Act does not have a power to entertain any dispute which constitutes a non-compoundable offence. The language of Section 22 (8) (c)reads as follows:- 22-C(8) Where the parties fail to reach at an agreement under sub-section (7),the Permanent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2013

Sajjan Kanwar Bafna Vs. District Collector of Kancheepuram District

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-18-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Transmission Licensee in the capacity of Central Transmission Utility, as envisaged under Sections 38 and 40 of the Electricity Act, 2003. As per Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Government of India had passed an order, dated … petitioner, at about 3.30 p.m, on 21.1.2013, asking the petitioner to attend the proceedings to be held on 22.1.2013. As such, the petitioner had not been given sufficient opportunity to raise her objections, along with the necessary

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial