Advanced Search Results

G.V.S. Rama Krishna and ors. Vs. A.P. Transco Rep. by Its Managing Dir ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 57(2), 67 to 69, 164, 185 and 185(2); Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 19, 37, 51 and 53; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 28, 29, 29(2), 42, 42(1), 42(2), 69(1) and 69(2); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956

Reported in : AIR2009AP158; 2009(3)ALT502; 2009LC(AP)517

came into force w.e.f. 10.06.2003.9. The material on record shows that in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Government of A.P. issued G.O.Ms. No. 115, Energy PR.III, dated 07-10-2003 … lines through the lands of the petitioners as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003.3. It is pleaded by the petitioners that originally a 400 KV line under Vijayawada Power Transmission Scheme was … arbitrary, illegal and in violation of the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003.3. It is pleaded by the petitioners that originally a 400 KV line

Mrs. Madhu Garg and anr. Vs. North Delhi Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 - Sections 28(10); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 24, 24(1), 26, 49, 69, 79 and 79; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(15), 43(3) and 56; ERC Act - Sections 22(1), 26, 29, 29 (1) and (4); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 21(2), 22 and 24; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29(1); Tariff Act; DERC (Performance Standards Metering and Billing) Regulations, 2002; Electricity (Supply) Annual Account Rules; Tariff Rules

Reported in : 124(2005)DLT688

Matched in: Advocate Reetesh Singh, Adv.,; Sujit K. Singh, Adv. in W.P. (C) No. 3532/2003,;

Ashley Alteams India Limited. Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 2(51); Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004 - Regulation 2(l); Constitution of India - Articles 226

consent by the competent authority. Petitioner satisfies the definition of owner as defined under Section 2(51) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and "consumer's premises" as per Regulation 2(l) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004. Therefore, petitioner is

Tata Steel Ltd. and ors. Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 56(1), 56(2), 62(2), 64, 64(2), 181, 185 and 185(2); Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 17, 22(1), 22(2), 29, 45, 82 and 85(1); Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 62(4); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Tariff) Regulations, 2003 - Regulations 20 and 21

Reported in : AIR2008Jhar60; 2008(56)BLJR412; [2008(1)JCR580(Jhr)]

supplementary bill(s) cannot be raised for a period beyond two years in view of Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003;(iv) to refund the amount, which was realized by the JSEB as against the supplementary bill(s) with interest [this

Hinduja Foundries Limited. Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 2(51); Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004 - Regulation 2(l); Constitution of India - Articles 226

the building and structure, he will fall within the definition of owner as per Section 2(51) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and Regulation 2(l) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004. Relevant portion of the decision in paras

Ms.A.R.S. Metals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Bo ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 2(51); Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004 - Regulation 2(l); Constitution of India - Articles 226

7.06.2012 issued by the second respondent and quash the same as being contradictory to the provisions of the Electricity Act 2003 and Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, 2004 and Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004.COMMON ORDERWrit Petition No.15238 of … Electricity Distribution Code, 2004 as the area served by a service connection and the word premises defined under Section 2(51) of the Electricity Act, 2003 as any land, building or structure . Regulation 2(l) of the Tamil

Chemplast Sanmar Limited. Vs. the Chairman and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 2(51); Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004 - Regulation 2(l); Constitution of India - Articles 226

the building and structure, he will fall within the definition of owner as per Section 2(51) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and Regulation 2(l) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004. Relevant portion of the decision in paras

Central Power Distribution Co. and ors. Vs. Central Electricity Regula ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 79(1); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 2(32), 28, 28(1), 28(2), 28(3), 29, 33, 33(3), 79(1), 86, 86(1) and 178(2); Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 15

Reported in : AIR2007SC2912; 2007(2)BLJR2461; JT2007(10)SC238; 2007(10)SCALE72; (2007)8SCC197

provided in the order of the CERC by its order dated 4.1.2000 be implemented under the provisions of Electricity Act, 2003, particularly when there is no provision under the statute that allows the CERC to levy Unscheduled Interchange Charges? … It is submitted that the order dated 4.7.2005 passed by the Commission in discharge of its power under Section 79(1)(a) of the Electricity Act, 2003 cannot be justified. It is further argued under Section 79(1)(c) the Central … the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate Jurisdiction) in Appeal No. 152 of 2005 whereby the Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants. 2.

P.Nachimuthu and ors. Vs. the District Collector and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 180, 68(1), 183, 176(2)(e); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 6 to 12; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 10

Central Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003: 27.Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line

Shri Sathya Sai Warehousing and Logistics Park (Sss ) Pvt.Ltd. Vs. the ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003. - Sections 68, 164, 185(2)(b); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12(1)(2), 18; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 12, 16; Constitution of India - Article 226, 21

it is not in dispute. Admittedly, no rules have been framed in terms of Section 67 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 185(2)(b) of the Electricity Act, 2003 which deals with Repeal and Saving provides that the provisions contained in