Advanced Search Results

Rahdey Shyam Bansal Vs. B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ElectricityCriminal

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 152, 152(1), 152(3) and 152(4); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183(1), 183(2), 184, 186, 189, 194 and 200; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 300, 320 and 482

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT462

order dated 14th March, 2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma, Delhi ('Special Judge') under the Electricity Act, 2003 ('Act') in Criminal Complaint No. 217 of 2005 whereby the application filed by the Petitioner under Section 152 … Section 178, Section 179, Section 180, Section 181, Section 182, Sub-section (1) or Sub-section (2) of Section 183, Section 184, Section 186, Section 189 may either before or after the institution of the prosecution, be compounded by such

Tdi International India Ltd vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

mentioning that the lease out will be activated from 01.06.2004, and the Respondents were obliged to provide the electricity supply.9. Thereafter, between July 2004 and March 2005, several letters were exchanged between the parties regarding the electricity … HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARJUDGMENTHARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.1. The present Petition has been instituted under Section 34 of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, challenging the Arbitral Award dated 26.02.20102 rendered by the learned Sole Arbitrator in the matter titled 5M/s … AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 17.01.2026Judgment pronounced on: 24.02.2026+ O.M.P. (COMM) 184/2017 TDI INTERNATIONAL INDIA LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Mohan, Senior Advocate with

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; Section 56, Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006; Section 154, Electricity Act, 2003; Section 27 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997; Section 61 of the Competition Act, 2002. 24Section … service of Chairperson and Members of Tribunals, Appellate Tribunals and other authorities. According to Section 183, provisions of Section 184 applied to the Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson, Chairman, Vice- Chairman, President, Vice-President, Presiding Officer or Member of the Tribunal, Appellate

Vbc Ferro Alloys Limited., Hyderabad and Others Vs. Karnataka Electric ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : MRTP

since the procurement in question comes within the ambit of Section 79 (1) (b) and (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and so, the Central Commission alone has got the jurisdiction. (b) The Second Issue is as to whether

Bses Rajdahani Power Limited, New Delhi Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulato ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Education

the Procedure to be followed by the Appropriate Commissions in the penalty proceedings under Section 142 of the electricity Act, 2003?” This question is dealt with in this judgment. 2. BSES Rajdhani Power Limited is the Appellant. Delhi Electricity

Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delh ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(20), 2(25), 2(31), 2(32) and 184; Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978 - Sections 2(2) and 43; Delhi Metro Railway (Operation and Maintenance) Act, 2002 - Sections 2(2), 2(P) and 104; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 3(4); General Clauses Act, 1879 - Sections 8(1); Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act - Sections 28(A); Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944

Reported in : 150(2008)DLT367; 2008(103)DRJ369

the Assessing Authority to decide the question whether the petitioner is liable to pay tax in view of Section 184 of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the 1989 Act, for short). After remand, the Additional … rails, sidings, or yards, or branches used for the purposes of, or in connection with, a railway;(c) all electric traction equipments, power supply and distribution installations used for the purposes of, or in connection with, a railway;(d)

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

versus MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 125 of the Electricity Act 2003, is against a judgment and order dated 27th April 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, hereinafter

State of Gujarat Vs. Utility Users Welfare Association Through Its Pre ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

T.C.(C) No.139/2015 T.C.(C) No.138/2015 T.C.(C) No.137/2015 T.C.(C) No.140/2015 C.A. No.3759-3760/2016 T.P.(C) No.974/2016 JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said Page 1 of 84 Act’) provides for Central and State Regulatory Commissions. … of the said Act deals with matters relating to Regulatory Commissions - their constitution, powers and functions, etc. Sections 76 & 77 of the said Act are concerned with the constitution of the Page 4 of 84

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (Tneb), Chennai Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corpo ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Education

to file the Appeals as against those orders within 45 days as prescribed in Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 but has now chosen to file these Appeals as against those orders on 14.5.2010 i.e. nearly after 4 … and 1338 days in filing both the Appeals respectively, the Appellant filed IA 182 of 2010 and IA 184 of 2010 to condone the said delay. 28. Though the Impugned Order in question were passed on 19.5.2005,

Holland (Respondent) Vs. the Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue a ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

the companies were associated. Throughout the rest of 2002 and most of 2003 there was what Rimer LJ called "sporadic and inconclusive" correspondence between HMRC … office as a director. But Millett J added these words at p 184: "The liquidator submitted that where a body corporate is a director of … occupying the position of director, by whatever name called": see now CA 2006, section 250. In Re Lo-Line Electric Motors Ltd [1988] Ch 477, 489 Sir Nicolas Browne-Wilkinson V-C, noting that this definition was inclusive and not … 2006 against Mr Holland and his wife Linda. The applications were made under section 212 of the Insolvency Act 1986 ("IA 1986"). It was alleged that Mr and Mrs Holland were de facto directors of 42 insolvent