Advanced Search Results

Orissa Consumers' Association and Anr. Vs. Orissa Electricity Regulato ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 179, 181, 181(3) and 182; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 23, 23(2) and 23(5); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1), 4 and 8; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Determination of Tariff for Retail Sale of Electricity) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 2

Reported in : AIR2005Ori11

the purpose of determination of tariff for distribution and retail supply of electricity for the year 2004-2005. The Electricity Act, 2003 (for short, 'the 2003 Act') came into force on 10-6-2003. The grievance of the petitioners in the writ … such Regulations have not been subjected to previous publication as provided in S, 181(3). He next submitted that Section 182 of the 2003 Act further provides that the Regulations made by the Commission shall be laid, as soon

Rahdey Shyam Bansal Vs. B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ElectricityCriminal

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 152, 152(1), 152(3) and 152(4); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183(1), 183(2), 184, 186, 189, 194 and 200; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 300, 320 and 482

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT462

order dated 14th March, 2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma, Delhi ('Special Judge') under the Electricity Act, 2003 ('Act') in Criminal Complaint No. 217 of 2005 whereby the application filed by the Petitioner under Section 152 … after the commencement of this Act punishable under Section 177, Section 178, Section 179, Section 180, Section 181, Section 182, Sub-section (1) or Sub-section (2) of Section 183, Section 184, Section 186, Section 189 may either before or

The Kerala High Tension and Extra High Tension Industrial Electricity ...

Court : Kerala

under this Act. WP(C) NO. 19205 OF 2023 : 11 : performance of its statutory functions under the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 1258 provides that any person aggrieved by any decision of the APTEL may file an appeal to the … gazetted and acted upon. As regards the contention regarding the repayment of principal amount on the Master 9 Section 182 - Rules and regulations to be laid before State LegislatureEvery rule made by the State Government and every

Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. M/S. Hamsaveni Carbides

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

dues, which it is entitled to realise, under the statutory provisions. In this context, Section 46 of the Electricity Act, 2003 is to be referred. This provision reads thus; "46. Power to recover expenditure - The State Commission may, … to refer to Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd. v. Union of India {(2012) 11 SCC1, where in paragraph 182, the Apex Court has summarised the guiding principles of promissory estoppel thus; "182. In my view, the following

B.S.N.L. Vs. Telecom Regulatory Auth.of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 including Sections 73, 75, 79, 86, 111, 177, 178, 179, 181 and 182, and observed:“47. On the above submissions, one of the questions which arises for determination is-whether trading margin fixation … cannot be used for framing regulation on that topic. Learned senior counsel referred to Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which, according to him, is pari materia to Section 11(2) and argued that in view of paragraph 15

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (Tneb), Chennai Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corpo ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Education

to file the Appeals as against those orders within 45 days as prescribed in Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 but has now chosen to file these Appeals as against those orders on 14.5.2010 i.e. nearly after 4 … was delay of 1668 days and 1338 days in filing both the Appeals respectively, the Appellant filed IA 182 of 2010 and IA 184 of 2010 to condone the said delay. 28. Though the Impugned Order in

Power Grid Corporation of India Vs. Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran

Court : Central Electricity Regulatory Commission CERC

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Central Electricity Regulatory Commission CERC

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Chennai Vs. M ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

M.p. Power Management Company Limited Vs. M/s Sky Power Southeast Sola ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

respondent is also shown. It would appear that the fifth respondent is created under Section 31 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 31 reads as follows: “Constitution of State Load Despatch Centres.-(1) The State Government shall establish a Centre to … the lowest bidder in respect of the project in question and what is more an incredible number of 182 bidders participated. It is trouncing its competitors that the holding company of the first respondent turned out to

Rajasthan Engineering College Society, Jaipur Vs. Rajasthan Electricit ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Education

the Electricity Act for the Financial Year 2011-2012. In accordance with the provision of Section 64(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Electricity Board published the abridged form of its application inviting objections and comments from the stake holders. … two issues, the same has already been decided by this Tribunal by Judgment dated 30.5.2012 in Appeal No. 182 of 2011 as under- "8. The contention of the Appellants that the Average Cost of Supply is the