Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: electricity act 2003 section 164 · Page 1 of about 355 results (0.042 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 26 2012

Shri Sathya Sai Warehousing and Logistics Park (Sss ) Pvt.Ltd. Vs. the ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-26-2012

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003. - Sections 68, 164, 185(2)(b); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12(1)(2), 18; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 12, 16; Constitution of India - Article 226, 21

in the impugned proceedings that since the erection of the tower lines is as per approved scheme under Section 164 of the Electricity Act 2003, the petitioner should co-operate in its implementation. Challenging the said reply Mr.V.Parthiban, learned … it is not in dispute. Admittedly, no rules have been framed in terms of Section 67 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 185(2)(b) of the Electricity Act, 2003 which deals with Repeal and Saving provides that the provisions contained in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2008

T.S.T. Kaznavi Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Rep. by Its Chairman,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-28-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(17), 2(28), 2(29), 2(32), 2(67), 2(72), 2(73), 2(77), 39(1), 67(2), 68, 164, 173, 174, 175, 185 and 185(2); Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 16, 16(1) and 16(3); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 12 to 19 and 51; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 42 and 51; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; The Works of Licensees Rules, 2006; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 188

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ703

has filed counter affidavit. According to the respondent Electricity Board, as per Sections 164 and 185(2)(a) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Board has the power of the 'Telegraph Authority' under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, with regard to … Utility' and the 'Licensee', will exercise the powers of Telegraph authority by virtue of the provisions contained in Section 164 read with Sub-section (2)(a) of Section 185 of the Electricity Act, 2003.2(d). According to the respondent Electricity Board,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2004

Sri Sai Surya Gardens (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-09-2004

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 164; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 12 to 18; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 300A

Reported in : 2004(4)ALD291; 2004(2)ALT256

July, 1998 and 24th September, 1998 has filed this petition challenging the provisions of Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short 'the Act'). Insofar as it seeks to vest power under Sections 12 - 18 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 07 2007

Ajay Munjal Memorial Trust and ors. Vs. Power Grid Corporation of Indi ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-07-2007

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 51, 67, 67(1), 67(2), 68, 164, 176(2) and 185; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12, 12(2) and 51; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10 and 15; Indian Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 42; Works of Licensees Rules, 2006 - Rules 3 and 3(4); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2008Jhar34; 2007(2)BLJR1798; [2007(3)JCR254(Jhr)]

and to undertake transmission of electricity through inter-State transmission system. Therefore by a notification dated 24.12.2003 issued under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Ministry of Power, Government of India, authorized the Licensee to exercise all … over their land 4. Respondent No. 1 is a Central Government Company and is a Licensee under the Electricity Act, 2003 (the Licensee for short). The Licensee is required to establish transmission system and to undertake transmission of electricity

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 2009

G.V.S. Rama Krishna and ors. Vs. A.P. Transco Rep. by Its Managing Dir ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-26-2009

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 57(2), 67 to 69, 164, 185 and 185(2); Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 19, 37, 51 and 53; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 28, 29, 29(2), 42, 42(1), 42(2), 69(1) and 69(2); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956

Reported in : AIR2009AP158; 2009(3)ALT502; 2009LC(AP)517

came into force w.e.f. 10.06.2003.9. The material on record shows that in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Government of A.P. issued G.O.Ms. No. 115, Energy PR.III, dated 07-10-2003 thereby … lines through the lands of the petitioners as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003.3. It is pleaded by the petitioners that originally a 400 KV line under Vijayawada Power Transmission Scheme was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2009

N.M. Giri S/O S.N. Muniswami, Vs. Amr Power Pvt. Ltd.,

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-20-2009

Subject : ElectricityProperty

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(49) and 164; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10 to 19, 19A, 16 and 17; Electricity Supply Act, 1943 - Sections 28(1) and 29; Electricity Act, 1910; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(6)KarLJ267; 2009(6)AIRKarR44

writ petitions the petitioners are essentially questioning the notification issued by the State under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short the Act').3. The facts germane far the disposal of thee we petitions are as follows:In both

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2015

S.A. Hakim Vs. The District Collector, Dindigul and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Nov-18-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Transmission Licensee in the capacity of State Transmission Utility as envisaged under Sections 39 and 40 of Indian Electricity Act, 2003 (in short '2003 Act'). Under Section 164 of the 2003 Act, the appropriate Government (the State Government herein)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2011

R.Santhana Raj Vs. the Chief Engineer

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-08-2011

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12(2), 17; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 185, 67 (2)(a) to (d); Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 11; Works of Licensees Rules 2006 - Rule 3(1)(a); Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21 Rule 97; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 225, 188; Customs Act, 1962 - Section 133; Works of Licensees Rules, 2006 - Rule 3(1) to (3)

12(2) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, since the 1910 Act was repealed by Section 185 of the Electricity Act, 2003. According to the learned Standing Counsel, the only right that the petitioners have, is to claim compensation and … makes it clear that nothing contained in this Rule shall affect the powers conferred upon any licensee under Section 164 of the Act. Therefore, the requirement of prior consent of the owner or occupier of the land, prescribed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2015

Jarnail Singh and Another Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Transmissi ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Aug-03-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

violative of principles of natural justice. The petitioners have also challenged the validity of Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as âEA, 2003â? for the sake of convenience), the Govt. Resolution dated 24.8.2006, first proviso

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 2026

M/s.Progen Renewables Ltd Vs The Power Grid corporation

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-09-2026

is against the 6 th respondent’s Load Flow Study dated 27.11.2025 and without following the provisions of the Electricity act, 2003 and the Indian Telegraphic Act, 1885.For Petitioner : Mr.V.C.Janarthanan for Mr.R.S.Pandiyaraj For Respondents : Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan, ASGI 1 to … Eswari’s case with particular reference to paragraph No.7.4 wherein the Hon’ble Judge has observed that a reading of Section 164 of the Electricity Act clarifies that the power conferred under Section 16(1) is non-delegable. He would further submit

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial