Advanced Search Results

Rajesh Mehra and ors. Vs. B.S.E.S.Yamuna Power Ltd.and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 162 read with 185(2)(c); Indian Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rules 29, 52

in view of the alternative efficacious remedy provided in terms of Section 162 r/w 185 (2)(c) of the Electricity Act, 2003 r/w Rules 29 & 52 of the Indian Electricity Rules, 1956. CM No.674/2011 has also been filed by

Gurpreet Singh, New Delhi Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Inspector, without any extra remuneration, for the purposes of exercising the statutory powers and performing the functions under Section 162 of the Electricity Act, 2003 cannot be equated with his regular promotion as Electrical Inspector. For want of … all consequential benefits. 6. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that as per statutory Recruitment Rules and Electricity Act, 2003, there has to be a post of Electrical Inspector to discharge the statutory duties under the Electricity Act.

Raj Pal Singh Vs. the Executive Engineer, Bypl and anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 162 read with 185(2)(c); Indian Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rules 29, 52

Electricity Rules, 1956, it was held that the alternative efficacious remedy in such a situation is provided under Section 162 read with Section 185(2)(c) of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with Rules 29 & 52 of the Indian … W.P.(C) No.5885/2010 titled Rajesh Mehra v. B.S.E.S. Yamuna Power Ltd. where on examination of the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 and Indian Electricity Rules, 1956, it was held that the alternative efficacious remedy in such a situation is

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (Kptcl) vs Mrs. Rekha

Court : Karnataka

ignored by the learned Single Judge. 7.2. He stated, the appellant could not have filed an appeal under Section 162 of the Electricity Act, 2003 to challenge the report of the Electrical Inspector as it was not a … of the learned Single Judgeare contrary to the report of the Electrical Inspector under Section 161 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The Electrical Inspector in his report dated 31.05.2018 (Annexure-E) hasheld that the accident occurred due to the negligence

The Government of Nct of Delhi & Anr. Vs.mukesh Kumar Sharma & ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

appointed as Electrical Inspectors for exercising the statutory powers and performing the functions under Sec. 162 of the Electricity Act, 2003, without any extra remuneration. In pursuance thereof, the respondents have been exercising the statutory powers and performing the … for equal work’. ‘The principle like nature, W.P.(C.) No.12081/2016 Page 4 of 6 the Code of law e.g. Section 59 of In accordance with Section 3 of of “equal pay for equal work” is expressly recognised by

M/S. Ferro Alloys Corporation Limited and Others Vs. Odisha Electricit ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

is the Odisha Electricity Regulatory Commission (Commission). 3. These Appeals have been filed under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the order dated 21.1.2012 passed by the Odisha Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Commission) … of supply of electricity.” The Central Govt. have constituted the Forum of Regulators (FOR) in pursuance to Section 162(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. This Forum consists of the Chairperson of the Central Commission and Chairpersons of

Rajeev Singhal & Anr vs.m.c.d. (East Delhi Municipal Corporation) ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

has already submitted its report to the Electrical Inspector appointed by the Government under Section 162 of the Electricity Act, 2003, a copy of which is attached as Annexure R1/3, from which it is seen that the electrical installations

Kamakshi Lamipack Private Limited, Rep.by Its Director Vs. the Governm ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

for considering suspension of cross subsidy surcharge for third party sale as per Section 42 (2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The said request of TNEB was accepted by the fifth respondent/Commission, observing that for relinquishment of a right … 9.2.11. Therefore, it is manifestly clear that though the extent of executive power has been defined under Articles 162 of the Constitution, if executive orders are not in conformity with the Constitution or the provisions of the

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

versus MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 125 of the Electricity Act 2003, is against a judgment and order dated 27th April 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, hereinafter

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd Vs. Solar Semiconductor Power Company (In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

period during which a particular tariff order operates. In order to address the issue, certain provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) are required to be noticed. Part VII of the Act deals with … present case, the first respondent obtained the Chief Electrical Inspector Certificate, which is the statutory mandate as per Section 162 of the Act only on 13.03.2012, nearly two months after the expiry of the Tariff Order (2010). WHETHER