Advanced Search Results

Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. Reliance Energy Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(4), 3, 14, 16, 42, 42(5), 42(6), 45(5), 55(2), 57, 61, 62, 76, 76(1), 79, 79(1), 82, 83, 84, 85, 85(1), 86, 86(1), 86(2), 94, 96, 125, 126, 127, 128, 128(1), 128(5), 128(6), 129, 142, 143, 163 and 181; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity Supply Act, 1948; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 17; Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum and Ombudsman) Regulations, 2003

Reported in : AIR2008SC976; 2007(4)AWC3662(SC); 2008(1)BomCR738; JT2007(10)SC365; 2007(10)SCALE279; (2007)8SCC381; [2007] 9 SCR 9

Civil Appeal No. 2846 of 20061. This appeal under Section 125 of the of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter for short 'the Act') is directed against the judgment and order dated 29th March, 2006 passed by … of electricity.Section 142 of the Act provides for punishment for non-compliance of directions issued by the Commission and Section 143 empowers the Commission to adjudicate after holding an inquiry in such manner as may be prescribed by the

DakshIn Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Hisar, Haryana (Through Its Managin ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

that has to be determined in this case is whether this Tribunal acting under section 111 of the Electricity Act 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has the jurisdiction to hear an appeal against the order of the … Act to determine who is an adjudicating officer. The word ‘adjudicating officer’ is found in sub-section 2 of section 143 of the Act. Section 142 of the Act deals with punishment for non-compliance of directions of the Commission.

U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. Northern Region Load Despatch

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL520

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Udaipur Distillery Co. Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 43B, 143(1), 143(2), 143(3), 154 and 260A

Reported in : (2003)182CTR(Raj)284; [2004]267ITR358(Raj)

Matched in: Citation (2003)182CTR(Raj)284; [2004]267ITR358(Raj)

M/s.Progen Renewables Ltd Vs The Power Grid corporation

Court : Chennai

is against the 6 th respondent’s Load Flow Study dated 27.11.2025 and without following the provisions of the Electricity act, 2003 and the Indian Telegraphic Act, 1885.For Petitioner : Mr.V.C.Janarthanan for Mr.R.S.Pandiyaraj For Respondents : Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan, ASGI 1 to … the compensation. He would rely upon the following judgments:(i) 2017 5 SCC 143 -[Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. v. Century Textiles and Industries Ltd](ii) … to remove the solar panels which is arbitrary and without the authority.8. The petitioner would submit that under Section 16 of theIndian Telegraph Act, 1885 as and when a landowner raises objections, the District Collector is required

Panyam Cements and Mineral Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)105TTJ(Hyd.)909

assessee is that in the light of the apex Court decision in the case of CIT v. Gujarat Electricity Board (2003) 181 CTR (SC) 28 : (2003) 260 ITR 84 (SC) intimation under Section 143(1)(a), shall be … refer to the technical ground i.e. with regard to the legality of the prima facie adjustments made under Section 143(1)(a) of the Act, when the proceedings under Section 143(2) were set in motion.3. The case of the learned

Municipal Corporation of Greater Vs. Maharashtra Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

impugned MERC order dated November 6, 2007 passed, inter-alia, under the provisions of Section 86(1) (f) of The Electricity Act, 2003 (The Act in short). The appellant has challenged the validity and legality of that part of the impugned … appeal. He does not press the appeal and accordingly, the same is dismissed as not pressed.6. Appeal No. 143 of 2007 has been filed by Reliance Energy Ltd. and challenges the impugned MERC order dated November 6,

Tamil Nadu Magnesite Ltd., Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

the petitioner would rely on a judgment of the Honble Supreme Court inCommissioner of Income Tax v. Gujarat Electricity Board (2003 ITR (Vol.260) 84) wherein, it has been held as follows:- Even otherwise, the view taken by … rectification under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act could be passed to rectify the intimation given under Section 143(1)(a) of the Act, after a final assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Act has been passed.2. The

JaIn Metal Components Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)84TTJ(Jodh.)797

the Act. This matter came up before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Gujarat Electricity Board (2003) 260 ITR 84 (SC) where the apex Court held that once a notice under Section 143(2)

The Hubli Electricity Supply Company Vs. Shri.shreeshail S/o Gurulinga ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the plaint on the ground that, it was not maintainable in view of Section 145 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for brevity hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). The trial Court after inviting objection to the said application … entertain the suit.9. Appointment of Adjudicating Officer and who could be the Adjudicating Officer can be inferred from Section 143(1) of the Act which reads as below: “143. Power to adjudicate - (1) For the purpose of adjudging