Advanced Search Results

Ajmer Vidyut Viteran Nigam Limited, Rajasthan Vs. Rajasthan State Elec ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

No.227 of 2010 before the State Commission under Section 142 read with Section 86 (1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 to take action against the Appellant for non-compliance of the order dated 4.11.2006 and for directions for compliance

Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd. Vs. Gajendra Haldea and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 52, 60, 62, 66, 79(1), 86(1), 111, 111(1), 121, 127, 142 and 178; Central Electricity Rules, 2005 - Rule 9; Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Procedure, Terms and Conditions for grant of Trading License and other related matters) Regulations, 2004; Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Fixation of Trading Margin) Regulations, 2006 - Regulation 2

Reported in : 2008AIRSCW7294; 2008LC(SC)511; [2008(4)JCR10(SC)]; 2008(11)SCALE313; 2008(2)LC1095(SC)

Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (in short the `CERC') purportedly under Section 52 read with Section 79(1)(g) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (in short the `Act') on 28.2.2006. The prayers inter- alia were under: (a) Direct GRIDCO to adhere to … respondent No. 1-Gajendra Haldea in order to prove that he had locus standi relied on Sections 121 and 142 of the Act. It was also stated that it is not in the nature of PIL. It was

Cesc Ltd. Vs. Gajendra Haldea and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 60, 66, 111, 121, 125, 127 and 142

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW3987; 2009LC(SC)496; 2009(5)SCALE489; 2009(4)LC1738(SC)

Delhi (hereinafter referred to as to the `Tribunal'). The appeal has been filed under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (in short the `Act').2. The primary stand of the appellant is that though the Tribunal accepted that Electricity … respondent No. 1-Gajendra Haldea in order to prove that he had locus standi relied on Sections 121 and 142 of the Act. It was also stated that it is not in the nature of PIL. It was

Bharati Hexacom Limited Vs. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commissio ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

Commission (hereinafter called the State Commission) in Petition No. RERC/332/2012, whereby the petition filed by the Appellant-Petitioner under Section 142 read with Section 146 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for the unauthorized action of Respondent No.2 “ Jaipur … Surendra Kumar, JM. 1. The present Appeal has been filed under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the Order dated 11.12.2012 passed by the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter called the State Commission) in

Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. Reliance Energy Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(4), 3, 14, 16, 42, 42(5), 42(6), 45(5), 55(2), 57, 61, 62, 76, 76(1), 79, 79(1), 82, 83, 84, 85, 85(1), 86, 86(1), 86(2), 94, 96, 125, 126, 127, 128, 128(1), 128(5), 128(6), 129, 142, 143, 163 and 181; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity Supply Act, 1948; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 17; Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum and Ombudsman) Regulations, 2003

Reported in : AIR2008SC976; 2007(4)AWC3662(SC); 2008(1)BomCR738; JT2007(10)SC365; 2007(10)SCALE279; (2007)8SCC381; [2007] 9 SCR 9

Civil Appeal No. 2846 of 20061. This appeal under Section 125 of the of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter for short 'the Act') is directed against the judgment and order dated 29th March, 2006 passed by … the licence; or(c) direct the generating company to cease to carry on the business of generation of electricity.Section 142 of the Act provides for punishment for non-compliance of directions issued by the Commission and Section 143 empowers

Guru Ragvendra Textiles Rep. by Its Manager D. Bhoopalakrishnan Vs. Ta ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 56, 56(1), 111, 142 and 146; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, 2004

maximum punishment by passing appropriate orders in exercise of powers conferred in Sections 142 and 146 of the Electricity Act, 2003.8.2. Further, the Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association filed M.P. No. 7 of 2010, contending that the Electricity Board … Nadu Electricity Board by imposing a maximum punishment by passing appropriate orders in exercise of powers conferred in Sections 142 and 146 of the Electricity Act, 2003.8.2. Further, the Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association filed M.P. No.

Sree Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. Rep. by Its Director, Janarthanam Vs. the ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 56, 56(1), 111, 142 and 146; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, 2004

maximum punishment by passing appropriate orders in exercise of powers conferred in Sections 142 and 146 of the Electricity Act, 2003.8.2. Further, the Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association filed M.P. No. 7 of 2010, contending that the Electricity Board … Nadu Electricity Board by imposing a maximum punishment by passing appropriate orders in exercise of powers conferred in Sections 142 and 146 of the Electricity Act, 2003.8.2. Further, the Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association filed M.P. No.

Rangaa Foods Industries (P) Ltd. Rep. by Its Managing Director V.S.R. ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 56, 56(1), 111, 142 and 146; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, 2004

maximum punishment by passing appropriate orders in exercise of powers conferred in Sections 142 and 146 of the Electricity Act, 2003.8.2. Further, the Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association filed M.P. No. 7 of 2010, contending that the Electricity Board … Nadu Electricity Board by imposing a maximum punishment by passing appropriate orders in exercise of powers conferred in Sections 142 and 146 of the Electricity Act, 2003.8.2. Further, the Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association filed M.P. No.

Jagadambal Textiles Rep. by the Partner Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Reg ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 56, 56(1), 111, 142 and 146; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, 2004

maximum punishment by passing appropriate orders in exercise of powers conferred in Sections 142 and 146 of the Electricity Act, 2003.8.2. Further, the Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association filed M.P. No. 7 of 2010, contending that the Electricity Board … Nadu Electricity Board by imposing a maximum punishment by passing appropriate orders in exercise of powers conferred in Sections 142 and 146 of the Electricity Act, 2003.8.2. Further, the Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association filed M.P. No.

J.M. Mills (P) Ltd. Rep. by the Director Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Re ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 56, 56(1), 111, 142 and 146; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, 2004

maximum punishment by passing appropriate orders in exercise of powers conferred in Sections 142 and 146 of the Electricity Act, 2003.8.2. Further, the Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association filed M.P. No. 7 of 2010, contending that the Electricity Board … Nadu Electricity Board by imposing a maximum punishment by passing appropriate orders in exercise of powers conferred in Sections 142 and 146 of the Electricity Act, 2003.8.2. Further, the Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association filed M.P. No.