Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: electricity act 2003 section 137 · Page 1 of about 347 results (0.075 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 02 2007

Sri Tirumala Modern Rice Mill Vs. Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-02-2007

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 56, 126, 126(1), 126(2) 126(3) 126(4) 126(5), 126(6), 135, 137, 153, 153(1), 154 and 154(5); General Clauses Act

Reported in : AIR2007AP265; 2007(4)ALD349; 2007(4)ALT497

prima facie conclusion that the petitioner resorted to pilferage of energy. A case under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (Electricity Act, for brevity) was registered and power connection was disconnected. Provisional value of electricity pilfered was assessed … liability. In all the three cases, FIR was also lodged with the third respondent, who registered crime under Section 137 of the Electricity Act. It is also the case of the petitioners that after receiving provisional assessment notices,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 2013

U.P.Power Corporation Ltd. and ors. Vs. Anis Ahmad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-01-2013

Subject : MRTP

or apparatus belonging to a licensee maliciously etc. constitute “offences” which attracts punishment under Section 138 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 138 of the Electricity Act reads as follows: “138.Interference with meters or works of licensee.-(1) Whoever,- (a) unauthorisedly … ".Theft of electric lines and materials” constitute offence under Section 136; whereas ".receiving stolen property". constitute offence under Section 137. Interference with meters or works of licensee unauthorisedly connecting any meter, indicator or apparatus with any electric line;

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2012

Rohit Baiga Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-13-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

2012) The appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 21.9.2006 passed by learned Special Judge under Electricity Act, 2003, Sidhi in Special case No.16/2005, whereby the appellants were convicted for offence punishable under section 137 of Electricity

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 27 2019

Hassan Thermal Power Pvt. Ltd., Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-27-2019

Subject : Arbitration

the said Ordinance shall be deemed to have been done or taken under this Act. 28 defines Generating Electricity Act, 2003 Section 2 relates to definitions Sub-Section Company which reads as under:-"Generating Company means any company or body corporate or … while testing a retrospective statute in paras 14 and 18 which is to the following effect: (SCC pp. 137, 139 &140) 14. With this, let us advert to the issue on retrospectivity. No doubt, when it comes

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2012

Western Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. (Wesco) Vs. Orissa Electricity Reg ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : Dec-14-2012

Subject : Electricity

rate different from the applicable rate, the Tribunal upon examination of the provision of section 62 (3) of Electricity Act, 2003 observed that the Act does not permit the Commission to show undue preference to any consumer but differentiation … admission thereof for hearing was enough for the present appellant WESCO not to prefer this instant Appeal no. 137 of 2012 against the Commissions impugned order dated 31.1.2012 . The question, therefore, now is how far this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2009

Prabhash Kumar S/O Sri Kuleshwar Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar and Biha ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-18-2009

Subject : Election

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 135, 152, 152(1) and 152(3)

the First Information Report of Patliputra P.S. Case No. 137 of 2007 registered under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. The Assistant Electrical Engineer, PESU conducted a raid in the premises of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 2021

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-08-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

versus MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 125 of the Electricity Act 2003, is against a judgment and order dated 27th April 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, hereinafter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2016

All India Power Engineer Federation and Ors. Vs. Sasan Power Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-08-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

within a narrow compass.2. On 19.1.2005, the Central Government, in exercise of powers under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 issued guidelines for a tariff based competitive bid process to be initiated by distribution licensees /procurers for procurement

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2012

M/S. Jsw Steel Limited and Others Vs. Karnataka Electricity Regulatory ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : Dec-21-2012

Subject : MRTP

extent when any such provision of the Act, 1999 does not become repugnant to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 185(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003 is a clear and specific provision thereto. It is of no dispute … 1. Introduction: - In all, there are five Appeals being Nos.136 of 2011, 162 of 2011,167 of 2011, 137 of 2011 and 163 of 2011. All the five Appeals arise out of two but almost identical orders

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2014

Jagmohan Chopra Vs.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-22-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

unauthorized extension of load or theft of energy?. (ii) Whether the required notice under Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003 was ever served?. Learned counsel for appellant has contended that findings of both the courts below are based

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial