Advanced Search Results

Jagannath S/O Anna Khakare and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Th ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

in exercise of powers under Section 133 read with Sections 131 and 134 of Electricity Act, 2003, promulgated the scheme of transfer of employees and … Company Limited is formed after dissolution of Maharashtra State Electricity Board in view of notification issued under the Electricity Act, 2003, by the State on 04.06.2005. So far as petitioners in Writ Petition Nos.5120/2012, 4778/2012, 5144/2012 and some of … impermissible. 6. The contentions raised by the petitioners are controverted by Respondents contending that Respondent-Company is registered under Section 617 of the Companies Act and the Company can frame Classification and Recruitment Regulations, 2005, being a Government

Bihar Chamber of Commerce Vs. Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Education

No. 1 of 2011 and disallowed certain legitimate expenditures without any basis and genuine grounds. 4. Appeal No. 134 of 2012 This Appeal has been preferred by the Appellant under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 … 1. The Appeal No. 131 of 2012 has been preferred by the Appellant under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the Order dated 30.3.2012 passed by the Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter called the State Commission) in

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

versus MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 125 of the Electricity Act 2003, is against a judgment and order dated 27th April 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, hereinafter

N.M. Giri S/O S.N. Muniswami, Vs. Amr Power Pvt. Ltd.,

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ElectricityProperty

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(49) and 164; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10 to 19, 19A, 16 and 17; Electricity Supply Act, 1943 - Sections 28(1) and 29; Electricity Act, 1910; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(6)KarLJ267; 2009(6)AIRKarR44

writ petitions the petitioners are essentially questioning the notification issued by the State under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short the Act').3. The facts germane far the disposal of thee we petitions are as follows:In both … in the case of Ramniklal Bhutta and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. : (1997) 1 SCC 134 while dealing with the question of acquisition of land for public purpose has observed thus:The power under Article

Muhammed A.a. Vs. The State Of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

is ultra vires the regulation making power of the Central Electricity Page 1 of 37 Authority under the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short “the Electricity Act”) and, therefore, void. The Petitioner- therein also sought for a declaration that the … of impermissible delegation or on account of being manifestly arbitrary?.2. Can the provisions of a scheme framed under Section 131 r/w Section 133(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 offer any protection to officers / employees who do … be subject to the terms and conditions contained in Section 133 and 134 of the Act, though promotion and seniority have not been specifically mentioned

Syed Fazal Vs. State Of Karnataka By

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

occurrence of the incident and also causing for the death of the deceased and the same is unsustainable.30. Section 134 (1) (a) of the Electricity Act, 2003 defines, “Whoever, dishonestly, -- (a) taps, makes or causes to be … the appellant is convicted for the offence punishable under Section 304 of IPC besides Section 135(1)(a) of the Electricity Act, 2003.2. The accused is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of five years and shall pay fine of

Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board, Himachal Pradesh and Another ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

directions. A reply was filed by the Appellant to the State Commission on 13.03.2003. 2.4. On 10.06.2003 the Electricity Act, 2003 came into force. Subsequently, on 18.10.2003 the State Commission passed an order in which the appellant was found … Appeal before the Tribunal. Accordingly, this Appeal has been filed. Appeal No. 134 of 2006 2.10. In the Tariff Order dated 29.10.2001, the State Commission … Commissions Act, 1998. On 14.06.2001, the State Government directed that the State Commission will discharge the functions under Section 22 (1) of the 1998 Act. 2.2. On 29.10.2001 the State Commission issued a Tariff Order on the

D.S. Constructions Limited Vs. Rites Limited and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CivilContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 6(2), 7, 126, 128 and 130 to 141; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR2006Delhi98; III(2006)BC82; 2006(1)CTLJ123(Del); 127(2006)DLT1

Electricals Pvt Ltd v. Union of India 1986 SC 1918 and India Meters Ltd., Madras v. Punjab State Electricity Board and Ors. : (1993)1SCC230 .Defendants' Arguments7. On the other hand, Mr Anil Airi, the learned counsel for … Project, we extend the validity of our offer up to 30th November, 2003 subject to rebate in our bid being reduced from 18% offered on … the contract between the principal-debtor and the creditor, discharges the surety as to transactions subsequent to the variance. Section 134 stipulates that the surety is discharged by any contract between the creditor and the principal-debtor, by which the … refer to the first principles as set out in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as the Contract Act). When one person signifies

In the Matter of M/S Aditya Birla Chemicals (India) Limited Vs. Jharkh ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

of audited accounts. (b) The impugned order has not followed Section 61 (a) and Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 which envisages that the State Commission shall be guided by the principles and methodology specified by the Central … from patent illegality. 6. The learned Counsel appearing for some of the interveners in I.A. Nos. 132,133 and 134 of 2011, has also advanced their arguments in support of the Appellants. 7. In reply to the above

Tata Power Company Limited Bombay House and Others Vs. Maharashtra Ele ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

distribution licensees helps improving the quality of power and reducing the cost of the supply. (F) While the Electricity Act, 2003 contemplates that each of the parallel licensees should develop its own distribution system, it creates an enabling environment … RInfra-D and hence, continue to be consumers of RInfra-D, as the definition of 'consumer' as per the EA 2003 [Section 2(15)] includes any person whose premises are for the time being connected for the purpose of receiving electricity … licensee could use the same to move the electricity to its consumers. 134. According to the Appellant, as per Section 49 and 86 (1)(a) proviso,