Advanced Search Results

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

versus MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 125 of the Electricity Act 2003, is against a judgment and order dated 27th April 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, hereinafter … (Rs/Unit) Name of the No.Company Power (in relevant projects of MW) the Generating Company (i) 14.08.2008 Adani Power 1320 2.64 Units 2 and 3 of its Maharashtra Ltd. Tiroda Project (Respondent No.2) (ii) 23.02.2010 JSW Energy Ratnagiri

Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited and anr. Vs. Vidyut Lokpal (Ele ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : 2008(3)AWC2784

favour of the consumer. There is no technical objection to supply electricity through 33 K.V. Fatehpur Feeder and 132 K.V. Sub-Station. The dispute was confined to provide electricity from either the independent feeder or 33 K.V., Fatehpur … this writ petition to set aside an award of the 'Electricity Ombudsman' made under Section 42(7) of (The) Electricity Act, 2003.3. Shri Gopal Krishan Gupta, Managing Director of M/s. Shyam Ferrous Ltd., Fatehpur (the unit) applied for sanction of

Orissa Consumers' Association and Anr. Vs. Orissa Electricity Regulato ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 179, 181, 181(3) and 182; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 23, 23(2) and 23(5); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1), 4 and 8; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Determination of Tariff for Retail Sale of Electricity) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 2

Reported in : AIR2005Ori11

the purpose of determination of tariff for distribution and retail supply of electricity for the year 2004-2005. The Electricity Act, 2003 (for short, 'the 2003 Act') came into force on 10-6-2003. The grievance of the petitioners in the writ … the manner prescribed in Section 94 along with a notice in the form set out in Schedule III. Section 132 provides that any inhabitant of the Municipality within a fortnight of the publication of the notice could submit

In the Matter Of: M/S. Meenakshi Energy Private Limited Vs. Central El ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

more than one generating station, it will not necessitate the parties to obtain a transmission licensee under the Electricity Act, 2003. 17. As pointed out by the learned Counsel for the Appellant in view of the above judgment, it … The common evacuation system had been designed by the Power Grid in the capacity as the CTU under Section 38 of the Electricity Act, 2003. U/s 38 (2), the transmission utility has to undertake the transmission of … by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of (1989) 3 SCC 132 Marathwada University v Seshrao Balwant Rao Chavan. 49. Therefore, this issue is

AllaIn Duhangan Hydro Power Limited Vs. Everest Power Private Limited ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Uttar Pradesh Power Corpn. Limited and Another Vs. Noida Power Corpn. ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Vs. Noida Power Company Ltd. and Uttar

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226 and 227; Orissa Electricity Reforms Act, 1995; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 62, 62(3), 110 and 111

Reported in : AIR2006Ori117; 2006(I)OLR744

matter stood thus, on 25.11.2004, the NESCO submitted an application before the OERC under Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 in respect of its Revenue Requirement and Tariff for Retail Supply of power in its zone for the … inability to upgrade and maintain its 11 KV Grid Sub-station. The petitioner then upgraded its supply system to 132 KV by making huge investment and installed a 132 KV Grid Sub-station within its factory premises by investing

In the Matter Of: Damodar Valley Corporation Vs. Central Electricity R ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Direct Taxation

in the year 2003, w.e.f. 10.06.2003. Under this Act, the DVC was brought under the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 for electricity business. In view of the said Act, the tariff of the DVC for generation and inter-State … of Jharkhand. 2. The Appellant filed a petition before the Central Commission for determination of its tariff under sections 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, read with section 79 of the Act for generation, and inter-State … of appropriate fuel cost. h) OandM expenses allowed for Transmission System below 132 KV have not been considered. and i) Expenditure incurred on subsidiary activities

Tarini Infrastructure Limited Vs. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. Though ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL