Advanced Search Results

Manoj Rajani Vs. Superintending Engineer, M.P.E.B. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 18, 20, 26, 26(6), 53 and 67 to 69; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 42(5), 42(6), 42(7), 42(8), 185, 185(2) and 185(5); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 6(2); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 69(1); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 123; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113A; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20 and 226

Reported in : AIR2006MP100

Counsel for respondents Shri Prakash Jain has submitted that the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 has been repealed by Electricity Act, 2003 (for short 'the New Act') (36 of 2003) came into force from 2-6-2003 by virtue of Section 185 … Balumal Jamnadas Batra v. State of Maharashtra : 1975CriLJ1862 . (An enactment relating to burden of proof like Section 123, Customs Act, 1962, would be a. matter of procedure); Rai Bahadur Seth Sriram Durgaprasad v. Director of Enforcement

Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL310

Electricity Act, 2003, to exercise such functions and perform such duties as are assigned to it under The Electricity Act, 2003. Section 73 of The Electricity Act, 2003 enumerates the functions and duties of the first Respondent. Such functions are … for the period 1^st April, 1997 to 31^st October, 1997: (Rs. in lakhs) Impact due to additional capitalization 123 x 7/12 26. Annual fixed charges for the period 1^st November, 1997 to 31^st March, 2001 are allowed

Tata Power Company Limited Vs. Reliance Energy Limited

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL1080

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Uttar Pradesh Power Corpn. Limited and Another Vs. Noida Power Corpn. ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Uttar Pradesh Power Corporaton Vs. Noida Power Company Ltd. and Uttar

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

In the Matter of : Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited Vs. Rajasthan Ele ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

minimum charges. 56) Pronounced in open court on this 09th day of May, 2008. ORDER OF REFERENCE UNDER SECTION 123 OF ELECTRICITY ACT 2003 We have today (i.e. 08th May, ’08) delivered two judgments on this appeal. The … these sections have anything similar or analogous to the provisions of sub section 92) of section 56 of Electricity Act 2003. Section 455 of Municipal Corporation of Delhi Act provides for a method of recovery of certain dues. The Corporation

Brindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

12 other cases Karnataka before the enactment of the Karnataka Electricity Regulations, 1999 (“the KER, 1999”) and the Electricity Act, 2003 (“the Electricity Act” or “the Act”).5. They had also entered into agreements with the Government of Karnataka which … 3 . STATE LOAD DISPATCH CENTER MANAGED BY KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED, A NODAL AGENCY ESTABLISHED UNDER SECTION31OF THE ELECTRICITY ACT2003HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SLDC, RACECOURSE CROSS ROAD, ANAND RAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560009 EMAIL: [email protected] REPRESENTED BY … WP No.22770 of 2023 WP No.23729 of 2023 And 12 other cases 123. The State Commission, on the other hand, is entrusted with the following

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

versus MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 125 of the Electricity Act 2003, is against a judgment and order dated 27th April 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, hereinafter

Tata Power Co. Ltd. Vs. Reliance Energy Ltd. and ors.

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Baldev Singh Mann Vs. Surjit Singh Dhiman

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Election

Reported in : AIR2007P& H92

service of the government and were gazetted officers.4. According to Mann, Bachhi was Administrative Member of Punjab State Electricity Board. He was appointed on December 24. 2001 and belonged to Bhattiwal Khurd, a village falling in Dirba … the People Act, 1951? if so, its effect. OPP17. On October 17. 2003. an additional issue was framed which reads as under:Whether the returned candidates … under Sections 80 and 81 read with Sections 98, 99 and 100 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred lo as 'the Act') was presented by Baldev Singh Mann (hereinafter referred to as Mann) … Singh Dhiman 35099 votesBaldev Singh Mann 34103 votesELECTION PETITION2. The petition under Sections 80 and 81 read with Sections 98, 99 and 100 of the … had committed corrupt practices as detailed under Section 123(7) of the Act.REPLY OF THE WINNING CANDIDATE10. Surjit