Advanced Search Results

Southern Petrochemical Industries Co. Ltd. Vs. Electricity Inspector a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ElectricityOther Taxes

Acts : Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 6, 10, 14, 20, 20(1), 20(2) and 21; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 154A; Tamil Nadu Electricity Duty Act, 1939 - Sections 3; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5, 12, 46 and 49; Tamil Nadu Electricity (Taxation on Consumption) Act, 1962 - Sections 2(1), 2(3), 3, 3A, 12, 13, 13(1), 14 and 18; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 29; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Life Insurance Corporation (Modification of Settlement) Act, 1976 - Sections 11(2); Arbitration Act, 1940; Indian Succession Act, 1865; Gold (Control) Act, 1968; Scheduled Distri

Reported in : AIR2007SC1984; 2007(2)CTC273; 2007LC(SC)1166; (2007)4MLJ723(SC); 2007(7)SCALE392; (2007)5SCC447; 2007AIRSCW3752; JT2007(7)SC613;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.INTRODUCTION2. Validity and/ or application of Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity Act, 2003 (for short 'the 2003 Act') is in question in these appeals which arise out of a common judgment … Act - Held, if principle of promissory estoppel would apply, doctrine of legitimate expectation would also apply - Section 115: [S.B. Sinha & Markandey Katju, JJ] Promissory estoppel Held, It preserves a right. Exemption from payment of electricity

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd vs Fatik Chandra Ghosh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

pertaining to any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of anypower conferred by or under the Electricity Act, 2003 (‘Electricity Act’) is barred in terms of the provisions of Electricity Act.Brief Facts5. Respondent/plaintiff is the owner and … is that the Trial Court has exercised jurisdictionnot vested in it by law and thus in terms of Section 115 of CPC has prayed that the proceedings in CS SCJ No. 324 of 2021 titled “Fatik Chandra Ghosh

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Central Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line

Tata Power Trading Co. Limited Vs. the Central Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL698

this Appellate Tribunal has the jurisdiction under Section 111(1) and (6) as well as Section 121 of the Electricity Act, 2003 to entertain the appeals and examine the validity of the impugned Regulations and the Regulations impugned could be … also tried to distinguish the Full Bench judgment of this Appellate Tribunal rendered in Appeal Nos. 114 and 115 of 2005 Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited v. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and Ors. dated 9^th November, 2005. The

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Chennai Vs. M ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

M/S. Mohit Paper Mills Ltd. and Another Pvvnl and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

but having further scope of privatization. Lastly we had a comprehensive single Parliamentary Legislation in the form of Electricity Act, 2003 (Hereinafter referred to as the Act, 2003). 7. Everybody is agreeable to one aspect that one of the … or under Act 2003. 53. Section 146 provides for punishment for non-compliance of orders or direction given under Act 2003. Section 147 declares that penalties under the Act 2003 shall be in addition to and not in derogation of … the amended provision in the Code 2005 which I shall discuss later. 115. It is not in dispute that the UPERC has approved and notified

Beta Wind Farm (P) Limited Chennai and Others Vs. Tamil Nadu Electrici ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Wind Energy has been given in the Regulations 2008 as well as in Section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 33. Let us now refer to those Regulations and provisions of the Act,2003. 34. The relevant Regulation is … those details contained in the said Affidavit and pass appropriate order after hearing the parties on this issue. 115. In the light of our above observations, this issue is decided accordingly. 116. The 7th Issue is regarding

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

versus MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 125 of the Electricity Act 2003, is against a judgment and order dated 27th April 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, hereinafter

Power Grid Corporation of India Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)LCAPTEL1140

present appeal there is no controversy. An application for grant of Transmission License under Section 15(1) of the Electricity Act, 2003 was submitted by a Consortium known as TNB-KPTL consortium in favour of Bina-Dehgam Transmission Company for implementation of … and coming forward with the application for review. It will not constitute estoppel within the four corners of Section 115 of Evidence Act, nor it will constitute estoppel by acquiescence nor estoppel by deed nor representation nor estoppel

Raju Trambak Magare and ors. and Laxman Kautik Soyanke Vs. State of Ma ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : JT2001(3)SC411; (2001)10SCC385

plants Held, Right is saved even though Scheme of T.N. Tax on Consumption on Consumption or sale of Electricity Act, 2003 is different. Doctrine of legitimate expectation would also apply. INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES. Consolidating Act; Resort to earlier legislation … did not reveal sharing of any common intention of murdering deceased - accused liable to be acquitted. - Section 115: [S.B. Sinha & Markandey Katju, JJ] Promissory estoppel Held, It preserves a right. Exemption from payment of electricity