Advanced Search Results
U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. National thermal Power Corporation Ltd ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-03-2009
Electricity
Electricity Regulation Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 3(1), 13, 14(1), 14A, 14A(7), 14(2), 28, 37, 51, 55 and 79; Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 43A(2); Electricity Act, 2003; Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 and 114 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 47, Rule 1; Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1999 - Regulations 92, 93, 94, 103 and 110 to 117; Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms & Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2001 - Regulations 1.4, 2.4 and 2.7; ; ;
2009LC(SC)13; JT2009(3)SC462; 2009(3)SCALE620; (2009)6SCC235; 2009(2)LC966(SC); 2009AIRSCW5869; [2009] 3 SCR 1060
Authority, Regulatory Commission and establishment of Appellate Tribunal and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto, enacted the Electricity Act, 2003. It came into force with effect from 10th June, 2003.12. On or about 25th September, 1999 the Government … amendment of a tariff is concerned, the Central Commission stricto sensu does not exercise a power akin to Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure or Order XLVII, Rule 1 thereof. Its jurisdiction, in that sense, as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHassan Thermal Power Pvt. Ltd., Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Sep-27-2019
Arbitration
the said Ordinance shall be deemed to have been done or taken under this Act. 28 defines Generating Electricity Act, 2003 Section 2 relates to definitions Sub-Section Company which reads as under:-"Generating Company means any company or body corporate or … Member. However, the Judgment of the Supreme Court would apply prospectively. Such observation has been made in Para 114(v). Thus, petitioner has not made out prima facie case so as to interfere with the KERC order. 60
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTransmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. and anr. Vs. Sai Renew ...
Supreme Court of India
Jul-08-2010
Electricity
Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 61,82(1),86 (1)(a)(b),111(1),125,185,39,172(b),185(3); DevelopersElectricity Reform Act, 1998 - of Section 21 (4)(B); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Section 3,15,17,22; Reform Act, 1998 - Section 11,15(5),21,21(4),11(1)(c)&(e)
th July, 2004. Aggrieved from both these orders the Developers filed independent appeals under Section 111(1) of the Electricity Act, 2003 collectively against the order dated 20th March, 2004 as modified by order dated 7th July, 2004. These appeals … the Tribunal had framed as many as 12 points for determination which were answered by it in paragraph 114. The points formulated by the Tribunal, in fact, can be categorized in the following principal heads: (i) Matters
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S.21st Century Ferro and Alloys Ltd. Vs. Odisha Electricity Regulato ...
Orissa
Oct-19-2012
Electricity
law. Suo motu review power is not available to the Commission under the statute. Section 94 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short, “the Act, 2003”.) provides that the appropriate Commission shall, for the purpose of any enquiry or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Attitude Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Odisha Electricity Regulatory Commi ...
Orissa
Oct-19-2012
Electricity
law. Suo motu review power is not available to the Commission under the statute. Section 94 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short, “the Act, 2003”.) provides that the appropriate Commission shall, for the purpose of any enquiry or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. D.D. Iron and Steel (P) Ltd. Vs. Odisha Electricity Regulatory Co ...
Orissa
Oct-19-2012
Electricity
law. Suo motu review power is not available to the Commission under the statute. Section 94 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short, “the Act, 2003”.) provides that the appropriate Commission shall, for the purpose of any enquiry or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S.Bajrang Steel and Alloys Ltd. Vs. Odisha Electricity Regulatory Co ...
Orissa
Oct-19-2012
Electricity
law. Suo motu review power is not available to the Commission under the statute. Section 94 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short, “the Act, 2003”.) provides that the appropriate Commission shall, for the purpose of any enquiry or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S.Maa Girija Ispat Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Odisha Electricity Regulatory Commi ...
Orissa
Oct-19-2012
Electricity
law. Suo motu review power is not available to the Commission under the statute. Section 94 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short, “the Act, 2003”.) provides that the appropriate Commission shall, for the purpose of any enquiry or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S.Sri Radha Raman Alloys Ltd. Vs. Odisha Electricity Regulatory Comm ...
Orissa
Oct-19-2012
Electricity
law. Suo motu review power is not available to the Commission under the statute. Section 94 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short, “the Act, 2003”.) provides that the appropriate Commission shall, for the purpose of any enquiry or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Power Trading Co. Limited Vs. the Central Electricity
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Apr-28-2006
MRTP
(2006)LCAPTEL698
this Appellate Tribunal has the jurisdiction under Section 111(1) and (6) as well as Section 121 of the Electricity Act, 2003 to entertain the appeals and examine the validity of the impugned Regulations and the Regulations impugned could be … and they also tried to distinguish the Full Bench judgment of this Appellate Tribunal rendered in Appeal Nos. 114 and 115 of 2005 Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited v. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and Ors. dated 9^th November,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »