Advanced Search Results

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited Vs. R.K. Powergen Pri ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Karnataka Electricity Reforms Act, 1999 - Sections 25; ;Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 111, 111(2), 112 and 113

Reported in : ILR2005KAR5468; 2006(2)KarLJ608

the power supply to the system contained under Clause 4.2 (iii) it is to be noticed that the Electricity Act, 2003 came into force on 10.6.2003. In these circumstances the respondent filed an original petition before the Commission in … would deal with constitution of the Appellate Tribunal. Section 112 would deal with composition of the Appellate Tribunal. Section 113 would deal with qualifications for appointment of Chairperson and Member of Appellate Tribunal. A reading of these provisions

Abhay Tyagi Vs. State (Delhi Admn.) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 18, 37, 39, 53 and 67 to 69; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379, 419, 420, 467 and 468; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 50, 61, 121, 126, 126(6), 135 to 138, 151, 154, 154(5), 155, 174, 183, 185, 185(2) and 332; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 69(1); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 322, 332, 466A, 467 and 469; Delhi Electricity Rules Act, 2005; Delhi Electricity Reforms Commission Act, 2000; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 4, 4(2), 154, 173, 190(1), 195, 195(1), 200, 340 and 482; Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commissions (Performance standards, metering and billing) Regulation, 2002 -

Reported in : 2009LC(DEL)32

case may also be passed. 3. It is the submission of the petitioner that after the enactment of Electricity Act 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the New Act) which repealed the Indian Electricity Act 1910 as well as Delhi … Mool Chand Garg, J.1. This petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of the FIR No. 235/2004 registered … the respondents:-i) Sohan Lal v. North Delhi Power Ltd. and Ors. : 113(2004)DLT547 and ii) Bimla Gupta v. State and Anr. : 136(2007)DLT521 which the

Power Grid Corporation of India vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation an ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

W.P.(C) 2486/2015 − is a Government Company and a “Central Transmission Utility” notified under Section 38(1) of the Electricity Act, 2003. In W.P.(C) 1461/2013, PGCIL impugns the assessment order dated 02.02.2013 assessing its seven Electricity Transmission Towers located within … & other connected matters Page 3 of 23 therefore, such towers are not chargeable to Property Tax under Section 113(1)(a) of the MCD Act. It is further contended that Electricity Transmission Towers do not fall within the scope

Punjab National Bank Vs. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Electricity

be Section 17 of the Limitation Act, 1963. These relevant provisions read as under: Section 56 of the Electricity Act, 2003 Section 56. Disconnection of supply in default of payment.- (1) Where any person neglects to pay any charge for … period of two years is different and lesser than the limitation period of three years provided under Article 113 of the Schedule of the Limitation Act for filing a suit for recovery of monies. 11. The crux

Brindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

12 other cases Karnataka before the enactment of the Karnataka Electricity Regulations, 1999 (“the KER, 1999”) and the Electricity Act, 2003 (“the Electricity Act” or “the Act”).5. They had also entered into agreements with the Government of Karnataka which … 3 . STATE LOAD DISPATCH CENTER MANAGED BY KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED, A NODAL AGENCY ESTABLISHED UNDER SECTION31OF THE ELECTRICITY ACT2003HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SLDC, RACECOURSE CROSS ROAD, ANAND RAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560009 EMAIL: [email protected] REPRESENTED BY … to be guided by such directions in matters of policy involving - 113 - NC:2024. KHC:53048 WP No.11235 of 2024 C/W WP No.22770 of 2023

M/S. Vishwanath Sugars Ltd. and Others Vs. Karnataka Power Transmissio ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

versus MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 125 of the Electricity Act 2003, is against a judgment and order dated 27th April 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, hereinafter

Beta Wind Farm (P) Limited Chennai and Others Vs. Tamil Nadu Electrici ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Wind Energy has been given in the Regulations 2008 as well as in Section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 33. Let us now refer to those Regulations and provisions of the Act,2003. 34. The relevant Regulation is … wise data of loss of generation caused by grid problems during the period April, 2012 to January, 2013. 113. On this point, we have heard the learned Counsel for the Respondents. Admittedly, the State Commission in its

In the Matter Of: Damodar Valley Corporation Vs. Central Electricity R ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Direct Taxation

in the year 2003, w.e.f. 10.06.2003. Under this Act, the DVC was brought under the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 for electricity business. In view of the said Act, the tariff of the DVC for generation and inter-State … of Jharkhand. 2. The Appellant filed a petition before the Central Commission for determination of its tariff under sections 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, read with section 79 of the Act for generation, and inter-State … given by the Tribunal while remanding the matter as contained in para 113 of the judgment dated 23.11.2007. “113. In view of the above, the

T.N.Generation and Distbn. Corpn Ltd. Vs. Ppn Power Gen.Co.Pvt.Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Gen. Co. Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent JUDGMENT SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J.1. This statutory appeal under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) is directed against the final judgment and order dated 22nd February, 2013 … Nariman, is unknown to judicial proceedings.21. Mr. Nariman then submitted that the Chairman of APTEL is required under Section 113 of the Electricity Act to be a person who is or has been a Judge of the Supreme