Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: electricity act 2003 section 104 · Page 1 of about 0 results (0.054 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 14 2011

M/S. Mohit Paper Mills Ltd. and Another Pvvnl and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-14-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

but having further scope of privatization. Lastly we had a comprehensive single Parliamentary Legislation in the form of Electricity Act, 2003 (Hereinafter referred to as the Act, 2003). 7. Everybody is agreeable to one aspect that one of the … or under Act 2003. 53. Section 146 provides for punishment for non-compliance of orders or direction given under Act 2003. Section 147 declares that penalties under the Act 2003 shall be in addition to and not in derogation of … to the relevant category, and, reference to sub section (5) is redundant. 104. Section 176 confers power upon the Central Government to make Rules for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2012

M/S. Satguru Metals and Power Pvt. Ltd. Rep.by Its M Vs. Executive Eng ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-11-2012

Subject : Education

electricity charges to be paid by the petitioner Company was passed on 29.12.2010 under Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003.2. The petitioner Company in W.P.(C ) No.176 of 2011 has prayed for quashing of the inventory report date”11. … of Madhya Pradesh V. Mohammad Nooh, AIR 200.S.C. 2120, Harbanslal Sahnia V. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., AIR 201.Orissa 104, Kukumina Construction Private Limited V. Sub-Registrar-cum-Stamp Collector and others and AIR 200.S.C. 561, Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2012

M/S.Satguru Metals and Power Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Its M Vs. Executive Eng ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-11-2012

Subject : Education

electricity charges to be paid by the petitioner Company was passed on 29.12.2010 under Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003.2. The petitioner Company in W.P.(C ) No.176 of 2011 has prayed for quashing of the inventory report date”11. … of Madhya Pradesh V. Mohammad Nooh, AIR 200.S.C. 2120, Harbanslal Sahnia V. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., AIR 201.Orissa 104, Kukumina Construction Private Limited V. Sub-Registrar-cum-Stamp Collector and others and AIR 200.S.C. 561, Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 24 2013

Beta Wind Farm (P) Limited Chennai and Others Vs. Tamil Nadu Electrici ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : May-24-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Wind Energy has been given in the Regulations 2008 as well as in Section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 33. Let us now refer to those Regulations and provisions of the Act,2003. 34. The relevant Regulation is … impugned order by the State Commission are at par with the charges allowed by the other State Commissions. 104. Admittedly, the State Commission in the previous tariff order dated 20.3.2009 decided to divide the capital cost on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2014

Jamshedpur Utilities and Services Company Ltd. Vs. Jharkhand Electrici ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : Jan-08-2014

Subject : Education

Order 47 Rule 7 CPC is appealable before this Tribunal within the meaning of Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 ? 9. On this question, elaborate arguments were advanced by both the parties. 10. Let us refer to … CPC, is reproduced below: œAppeals from Orders: An Appeal shall lie from the following orders under the provisions of??Section 104 namely:- (a)¦¦(b)¦¦. (w) an Order under Rule 4 of Order 47 granting an application for review?. 33. Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : MRTP

determine policy and issue directions etc.); other enactments such as Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India, 2008; The Electricity Act, 2003 (Section 79 and various sub-sections enabling determination of policy, the Tariff, Regulations of Tariffs, facilitation of inter-State transmission of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2006

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-02-2006

Subject : Sales TaxMedia and Communication

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11; Constitution (46th Amendment) Act, 1982; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 32, 131, 136, 141, 226, 246(1), 248(1), 286, 366, 366(12) and 366(29A); Customs Act - Sections 2(22); Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(16), 65(72) and 66; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 149(90) and 149(92); Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 159(104), 159(105), 159(110) and 159 (111); Government of India Act, 1935; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11 and 12; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; Madhya Bharat Sales Tax Act, 1950; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act - Sections 2; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(7); State Sales Tax Act; Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 2; Telegr

Reported in : AIR2006SC1383; (2006)4CompLJ330(SC); (2006)201CTR(SC)346; [2006]282ITR273(SC); JT2006(3)SC114; 2006(2)SCALE752; (2006)3SCC1; [2006]145STC91(SC); 2006[2]STR161; [2006]152; [2006] 2 SCR 823

liability of service providers to service tax was continued under Section 159(105)(110) (b) and (111) of the Finance Act, 2003. The definition of subscriber was added in sub Section (104) as meaning 'a person to whom any service … held a telephone exchange being housed in immovable properties would make no difference because a tangible object like electricity which is generated in projects and transmitted through sub-stations housed in building has been held in CST v.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2013

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-29-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Central Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2019

The State of Jharkhand Department of Energy Through Its Law Officer Vs ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-03-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

to Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 as they could always be adequately compensated under Section 67 of the Electricity Act, 2003, if found entitled. 4.6. On the other hand, Advocate Mr. Satpal Singh supported the findings of the learned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2004

Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-17-2004

Subject : Electricity

Acts : The Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 14, 15, 19, 42, 49, 53, 56, 59, 62, 62(1), 64, 64(6), 82, 86, 131(2) and 172; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 24 and 24(1); Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 17, 22, 29, 29(2), 29(3), 85 and 85(1); Electricity Regulations, 1999 - Regulations 78, 84 and 88; Factories Act - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 14; Reorganization Act; Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : AIR2005Guj164; (2005)1GLR519

with retrospective effect.3. Mr. G.N. Shah, learned counsel for some of the petitioners advanced the following arguments:3.1 The Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was brought into force by Central Government Notification dated 10th June 2003. … of Orissa Fibre v.Orissa State Electricity Board, reported in AIR 1973 Orissa 104 it is held that when there is a bona fide dispute raised … 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was brought into force by Central Government Notification dated 10th June 2003. Section 172(d) of the said Act authorizes a State Government to declare that the said Act shall not apply

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial