Advanced Search Results

Sajjan Kanwar Bafna Vs. District Collector of Kancheepuram District

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Transmission Licensee in the capacity of Central Transmission Utility, as envisaged under Sections 38 and 40 of the Electricity Act, 2003. As per Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Government of India had passed an order, dated … High Tension Power Supply Lines. The project cost is about 58 crores for completing the works, by erecting 102 towers, for an approximate length of about 36 kilometres. The casting of the foundation for the erection of

Ptc India Ltd. Vs Jaypee Karcham Hydro Corporation .

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Himachal Pradesh to be developed by the respondent. The respondent is a generating company as defined in the Electricity Act, 2003.4. The appellant company has been granted license to trade in electricity by Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred … contemplated under the Electricity Act, 2003.41. In Appeal No. 71/2008 and IA 102/2008 titled as Lanco Amarkantak Power Pvt. Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Regulatory … PTC India Limited v. Jaypee Karcham Hydro Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as JKHCL) dismissing its petition under Section 9 (ii) (d) and (e) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking an interim stay against the termination

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Central Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line

M/S. Mohit Paper Mills Ltd. and Another Pvvnl and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

but having further scope of privatization. Lastly we had a comprehensive single Parliamentary Legislation in the form of Electricity Act, 2003 (Hereinafter referred to as the Act, 2003). 7. Everybody is agreeable to one aspect that one of the … or under Act 2003. 53. Section 146 provides for punishment for non-compliance of orders or direction given under Act 2003. Section 147 declares that penalties under the Act 2003 shall be in addition to and not in derogation of … within seven days of service of order or provisional assessment upon him. 102. Sub-section (6) of Section 126 provides for quantum of assessment and says

M/S. Ferro Alloys Corporation Limited and Others Vs. Odisha Electricit ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

is the Odisha Electricity Regulatory Commission (Commission). 3. These Appeals have been filed under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the order dated 21.1.2012 passed by the Odisha Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Commission) … remand proceedings for re-determination of cross-subsidy in tariff as per the Judgments of this Tribunal in Appeal Nos. 102, 103 and 112 of 2010 dated 30.05.2011 and in Appeal No. 57, 67-73 of 2011 dated 2.9.2011 and

Siel Limited Vs. the Punjab State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL931

17 of the Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 (for short Act of 1998). On 10^th June, 2003, the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short Act of 2003), came into force. By virtue of the first proviso to Section 82 of … The Commission, therefore, approves net interest and finance charges of Rs. 811.41 crores net of capitalization of Rs. 102.20 crores for the year 2005-06.123. It seems to us that the Commission has correctly analyzed the situation that

Ms Narsingh Ispat Limited Through Its Director Sri Hemant Goyal Vs. Jh ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

back 2 in the respective months itself, which is directly in conflict with the Section 56 of the Electricity Act, 2003. (B) For issuance of an appropriate writ or a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the

Beta Wind Farm (P) Limited Chennai and Others Vs. Tamil Nadu Electrici ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Wind Energy has been given in the Regulations 2008 as well as in Section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 33. Let us now refer to those Regulations and provisions of the Act,2003. 34. The relevant Regulation is … decided as against the Appellant. 101. The Fifth Issue is regarding Annual Maintenance Contract Charges and Insurance Charges. 102. According to the Appellants, the actual annual maintenance contract charges with insurance charges works out to 2.8% of

Kerala High Tension and Extra High Tension Industrial Electricity Cons ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

statement giving an undertaking that the State Commission would take into consideration Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and various policy documents reflecting the cost of electricity and progressive reduction of cross subsidy while finalizing the … this case will also be of no use to the Appellant. 38. The next case is Appeal nos. 102 of 2010 and batch in the matter of M/s. Tata Steel Ltd. vs. OERC and Others. In this

Shri Sathya Sai Warehousing and Logistics Park (Sss ) Pvt.Ltd. Vs. the ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003. - Sections 68, 164, 185(2)(b); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12(1)(2), 18; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 12, 16; Constitution of India - Article 226, 21

it is not in dispute. Admittedly, no rules have been framed in terms of Section 67 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 185(2)(b) of the Electricity Act, 2003 which deals with Repeal and Saving provides that the provisions contained in