Advanced Search Results

Tata Power Company Limited Vs. Reliance Energy Limited and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 22, 22(1) and 22(2); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2 and 21(2); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(15), 2(17), 2(61), 14, 14(2), 42, 42(2), 43, 60, 62(1) and 79(2); Electricity Act, 1903 - Sections 2 and 4(1); Indian Factories Act, 1881; Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 3(10); Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (Distribution, open access), Regulations, 2005 - Regulation 3

Reported in : 2008LC(SC)527; 2008(9)SCALE824; (2008)10SCC321

licence. Commission ought to have confined itself to the issues raised before it. INDIAN ELECTRICITY ACT (30 OF 2003) Preamble: [Ashok Bhan & Altamas Kabir,JJ] Object of the Act Held, The Act is meant to be consumer-friendly and … economy in the activities of the electricity industry to achieve the objects and purposes of the Act. The Electricity Act, 2003, which has replaced the ERC Act after hearings in this case were concluded, also specifically refers to the … 'MERC'), under Section 22(2)(e) and (n) of the Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 (hereinafter referred to as 'the ERC Act'), complaining of alleged encroachment by

Transmission Corporation of A.P. Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL682

is mandatory. In this connection, please see Section 14 of the Electricity Reform Act and Section 12 of Electricity Act, 2003, it is against this background that the relative obligations of parties have to be adjudicated. It is respectfully … Capacity, i.e., after deducting capacities for auxiliary consumption and captive consumption from installed capacity and as mentioned in Preamble & Schedule 1 of Agreement for sale to APTRANSCO. Whenever generation exceeds the installed capacity, the energy delivered

Santhosh.N.C. vs Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd.

Court : Kerala

provisions contained in the Regulations. According to them, the said provision is ultravires the provisions contained in the Electricity Act, 2003, as the same does not contain any provisions enabling the Central Electricity Authority to frame a regulation permitting … Electricity Board. Sections 53 or 73 also do not enable it to fix the qualifications. Referring to the preamble also, it was argued that the Electricity Act is not enacted to provide service conditions of the employees. … W.P(C).No.6410/2019 & c/cases 1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

Gmr Energy Limited a Company Incorporated Under the Provisions of Comp ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(5), 2(15), 2(19), 2(23), 2(28), 2(29), 2(30), 2(33), 2(39), 2(47), 2(70), 2(72), 3, 6, 7, 8, 8(3), 9, 10, 10(2), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 12 to 24, 25 to 41, 42 to 60, 61 to 66, 73, 79, 86(1), 108(1) and 178; ;Companies Act; ;Indian Electricity Act, 1910; ;Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; ;Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; ;Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2007; ;Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 301, 302, 303 and 304; ;Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (Power Procurement from Renewable Sources for Distribution Licensee) Regulations, 2004; ;Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Open Access in inter-State Transmission) Regulations, 2008 - Regulations 6, 9, 14, 15 and 28

demand-supply gap. Hence this order;Government Order No. EN 540 NCE 2008,Bangalore Dated: 30-12-2008In the circumstances explained in the preamble and in exercise of the powers conferred wider Section 11 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the State Government … to finer aspects of the National Policy on Power which finds statutory recognition and as reflected in the Electricity Act, 2003 and its ramifications, in so far as the obligation of the Government to encourage private sector participation, delicensing … the Government Order dated 30.12.2008 passed by the State Government under Section 11 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short hereinafter referred to as 'the

Power Trading Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Central Electricity Regula ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

This collection of service charge as per the direction have been continued even before the enactment of the Electricity Act, 2003 as well as before the fixation of the Trading Margin Regulations, 2006 introduced by the Central Commission. Therefore, … confer jurisdiction to the Central Commission. E) The fixation of trading margin is necessary in public interest. The preamble of the Act outlines as ‘protecting the interest of consumers’. If the Central Commission does not step in … Delhi is the appellant herein. 2. Aggrieved by the impugned order dated 19/12/08 passed by the Central Commission (CERC) directing the Appellant to enter into

The Station Manager, West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Compan ...

Court : West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

came down to Rs.5,091/-. The fault of the Appellants is evident which necessitated regeneration of the bill. The Electricity Act, 2003 has been enacted inter alia for protecting the interest of the consumers, which is spelt in its preamble. … by and dissatisfied with the order dated 05.06.2013 passed by the Ld. District Forum, Howrah in Case No. 176/2012, the OPs thereof have preferred this appeal. By the impugned order, the Ld. District Forum has allowed the

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court passed the following Order: 1. When the petition was filed Appellate Tribunal under Section 110 of the Electricity Act 2003 was not constituted. A tribunal has since been constituted under Section 110 of the Act. A notification has … passed by the Regulatory Commission under The Electricity Act, 2003 read with DERA Act, as seen from the Preamble portion of the Order. Therefore, in the circumstances there is no doubt that the appeal is maintainable under

Polyplex Corporation Limited, Uttarakhand and Others Vs. Uttrakhand El ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

the basis of the policy directions issued by the State Government dated 25.09.2009 under section 108 of the Electricity Act, 2003, has determined the tariff by bifurcating the power purchase cost for supply to different categories of consumers in … while determining the tariff. In the light of the scheme and the legislative scope, as mentioned in the preamble and Objects and Reasons of the Act and also the various guidelines which have been given, as referred … of HT and LT. 7. As per the Regulation and Under Section 181 of the Electricity Act, Uttarakhand Power Corporation Limited, (R-2) has to file

Ranchi Power Distribution Company Limited and Anr Vs. Jharkhand Bijli ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

the entire process for appointment of a Distribution Franchisee -28- flows from the provision of the Act. The preamble of the Electricity Act, 2003 reflects that the Act was enacted to slight the loss relating to generation, … registered under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956 and carrying on business of distribution of electricity under the Electricity Act, 2003 and having its Registered Office at Engineering Building, H.E.C. Dhurwa, PS Hatia, Ranchi 834004, Jharkhand, India. 2.Jharkhand Urja … OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 6542 of 2014 --- 1.Ranchi Power Distribution Company Ltd., a company registered under the provisions of the

The Tata Power Company Limited Through Its Authorized Signatory Cum He ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

as the entire process for appointment of a Distribution Franchisee flows from the provision of the Act. The preamble of the Electricity Act, -16- 2003 reflects that the Act was enacted to slight the loss relating to … Ltd. After the unbundling of erstwhile Jharkhand State Electricity Board in terms of the provision contained in the Electricity Act, 2003. Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'JUVN') came into existence holding the shares of … OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 2437 of 2015 --- 1.THE TATA POWER COMPANY LIMITED, a company registered under the Indian Companies Act,