Advanced Search Results

H.S. Pannu Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ElectricityCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 39, 44, 135 to 139, 151, 152, 154, 154(3) and 154(5); Electricity Rules, 2003; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 20(8); Maharastra Control of Organized Crimes Act, 1999; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21(3), 21(4) and 37; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.PC), 1973 - Sections 82, 83, 262 to 265, 397, 401, 437, 437(3), 438, 438(1), 438(2), 439, 446A, 497 and 498; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 409 and 420

Reported in : 2007(99)DRJ366

were heard together.2. The Petitioners purport to be aggrieved by orders of the Special Court, constituted under the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereafter referred to as 'the Act'). By the impugned orders in the first set of revisions, the Special … as a condition for enjoying liberty, during their trial, to pay substantial amounts to the complainant which form part of the claim of the complainant. Such procedure is un-heard of in law.11. Counsel contended that the provision … Counsel placed reliance on decisions of this Court, reported as Ashok Malhotra v. State 1994 (2) CCC 64; Sajani Khanna v. State 2002 (1) JCC

DakshIn Haryana Bijli Vitran Vs. Dlf Services Ltd., Dlf Universal

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL764

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Bharati Hexacom Limited Vs. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commissio ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

Surendra Kumar, JM. 1. The present Appeal has been filed under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the Order dated 11.12.2012 passed by the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter called the State Commission) in … Electricity Act, 2003 for the unauthorized action of Respondent No.2 “ Jaipur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd in charging tariff for the Telecom Towers of the … holding antenna or could even be mounted on buildings. BTS tower has obviously been held as an integral part of a mobile telecom system by the impugned order. 3. The relevant facts giving rise to the present

Western Electricity Co. of Orissa Vs. Sarat Chandra Mohanty, General

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL626

Mohanty the first Respondent herein, where he sought for an action under Section 19 or 24 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the DISCOM. (i) To set aside the Impugned Order dated 27^th January, 2006 passed by the OERC … not necessary to set out the details of the above said agreements or the stipulations contained therein or particulars and terms of privatization. The DISCOMS are required to manage the business of distribution in terms of license … Supply Company of Orissa Ltd. (WESCO for brevity) challenging the legality and validity of the Order dated 27^th January, 2006 passed by the sixth Respondent

Torrent Power Aec Ltd. Vs. Gayatri Intermediates Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 1 to 120 and 122 to 185; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 21(2), 26(6), 39 to 50; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 173; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganization and Regulations) Act, 2003; Electricity (Supply) Rules, 1948; Electricity Rules, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 47, Rule 1; Electricity Supply Code - Sections 7; Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply code and Related matters) Regulations, 2005 - Regulations 7, 7.1 to 7.4, 7.5, 7.6.1, 7.6.2 to 7.6.4, 7.6.5 to 7.6.8 and 7.7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1) and 226

Reported in : (2006)2GLR1580

ORDERNew Delhi, the 8th June, 2005.S.O. 790(E) Whereas the Electricity Act, 2003 (36 of 2003) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) came into force on the 10th June, 2003 :And … Code are issued by Government of India or by higher judicial for a, they will be treated as part of the Supply Code.8.2 In view of the aforesaid order dated 8th June 2005 of the Central Government … a, they will be treated as part of the Supply Code.8.2 In view of the aforesaid order dated 8th June 2005 of the Central Government

DakshIn Haryana Bijli Vitran Vs. Princeton Estate Condominium

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL356

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Sh. B.L. Kantroo Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 126, 127, 135 to 140, 145, 150, 153, 154 and 154(5); Limitation Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9 - Order 7, Rules 10 and 11 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 154(2008)DLT56; 2009LC(DEL)762

mainly on the following points:a) The jurisdiction of the civil court is barred under Section 145 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short the 'Act') as this case is covered under Section 126.b) A joint and duly authorized inspection … 1 and 2 CPC was listed on 12th February, 2008 and after hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, the learned Single Judge rejected the plaint on the ground that the suit is not maintainable under Order … bill above described and subsequent reports/speaking orders of defendant are illegal and void.b) pass a decree of permanent injunction in favour of the plaintiff and

Chhattisgarh State Power, Distribution Co. Ltd. Vs. J.P. Saboo, Urla I ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Lanco Infratech Ltd. Vs. Punjab State Electricity Regulatory Commissio ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

including the Council of Ministers in unanimity had accepted the tariff in violation of Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003. (ii) The State Commission under Section 63 of the Act has to only consider whether the process of … Electricity Board (R2) invited competitive bids on 18.1.2008 for setting up the power plant. 5. Totally 13 bidders participated in the bidding process and out of them 9 bidders were declared qualified, including the Appellant. Out of … M. Karpaga Vinayagam, Chairperson, J. 1. Lanco Infratech Ltd. is the Appellant herein. 2. The

Samsul Haque Mollick Vs. Cesc Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 43

Reported in : AIR2006Cal73

premises, he is entitled to get supply of electricity in view of provisions of Section 43 of the Electricity Act, 2003.2. Advocate for the petitioner contends that CESC is under a statutory obligation to give supply to the petitioner, … by the owner of the premises. His case is that he has been running a business from a part of the premises, and hence as an occupier of the premises, he is entitled to get supply of … of the premises, he is entitled to get supply of electricity in view of provisions of Section 43 of the Electricity Act, 2003.2. Advocate for