Advanced Search Results

M/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

the Appellants Captive Power Plant (CPP) to consumers other than the captive use is not permissible under Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and accordingly the Appellant should either take distribution license from the Commission under section 12 or seek exemption … Lodh Vs Third Addl. District Judge, Kanpur : (1984) 3 SCC 99. ix. The Commission by the Impugned Order dated 13.09.2010 has merely clarified that … has also allowed other persons to establish ancillary units within its premises for the purpose of developing components, parts and equipment for the use by the Appellant in the manufacture of passenger cars. The Appellant provides all

Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Vs. Noida Power Company Ltd. and Uttar

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

M/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

the Appellant’s Captive Power Plant (CPP) to consumers other than the captive use is not permissible under Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and accordingly the Appellant should either take distribution license from the Commission under section 12 or seek exemption … Lodh Vs Third Addl. District Judge, Kanpur : (1984) 3 SCC 99. ix. The Commission by the Impugned Order dated 13.09.2010 has merely clarified that … has also allowed other persons to establish ancillary units within its premises for the purpose of developing components, parts and equipment for the use by the Appellant in the manufacture of passenger cars. The Appellant provides all

Sri Swadesh Ghosh Vs. Cesc Limited and ors

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Education

the assessed amount as precondition and for filing of fresh appeal as envisaged under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and for other ancillary reliefs. 2 It is the case of the petitioner that he is engaged in … 669(E), dated 10th June, 2003, published in the Gazette of India, Extra., Pt.II, Sec. 3(ii), dated 10th June, 2003. Part XII of the new Act which relates to investigation and enforcement and provides for appeal to appellate authority … engaged in the business of manufacturing rubber goods from the factory premises 9/H/1, Abinash Chowdhury Lane, Kolkata-700046, in partnership with Sri Shambu Ghosh, under the

Commissioner of Trade and Taxes, Delhi vs.schneider Electric India Pvt ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

upto 11.03.2004 upto which the DISCOMs enjoyed being licensees under Electricity Act 1910 but not thereafter when the Electricity Act, 2003 was brought into force. The tribunal further held that the assesses were not entitled to claim deduction for … DST Act read with Rule 11 (XII) of the DST Rules up to the period 10.03.2004. The Tribunal partly allowed and partly dismissed the assessees’ appeal. It held that they were entitled to benefit of Rule 11(XII) … authority denied exemption for the period 2003-04 and raised demand of ` 9,16,62,309/- (including interest) by Assessment Order dated 10.09.2009, which was further reduced to

Hari Bansh Lal Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

issued in terms with the Jharkhand State Electricity Reforms Transfer Scheme, 2013 formulated under Section 133 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and in view of Regulation 5 of the Bihar State Electricity Board ( Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1973 … That this application is bona fide and in the interest of justice. IX. That the other and further grounds shall be urged at the time … charge. The appointment of petitioner was challenged by Sahodar Prasad Mahto in W.P.(PIL)No.5067/2008. After giving opportunity to the parties concerned, this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 27 th April, 2009 quashed the appointment of petitioner as Chairman

Anand Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

40(1)(a)(aa) is concerned, learned Advocate General and learned Senior Advocate invited my attention to section 165 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and the amendment to section 40 made by virtue of this provision, to say that the meaning of … for the purpose of setting up a 660x3 Mega Watt Thermal Power Station in the District of Katni. Particulars of the land held by the petitioners and other details are mentioned in the body of the petition … manner the impugned action is taken and a final Notification under section 9(1) of the Act has been issued on 18.7.2011 vide Annexure P/25. This

Siyalal Kachi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

40(1)(a)(aa) is concerned, learned Advocate General and learned Senior Advocate invited my attention to section 165 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and the amendment to section 40 made by virtue of this provision, to say that the meaning of … for the purpose of setting up a 660x3 Mega Watt Thermal Power Station in the District of Katni. Particulars of the land held by the petitioners and other details are mentioned in the body of the petition … manner the impugned action is taken and a final Notification under section 9(1) of the Act has been issued on 18.7.2011 vide Annexure P/25. This

Indian Wind Power Association vs.union of India Through Secretary, Min ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

and also informed us that the impugned tenders have already been awarded.3. Sections 62 and 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") are relevant for the adjudication of this petition. They provide as follows: … the respondents for procurement of wind energy. Although several different tender processes, issued by different entities in various parts of the country have been challenged in the petition, the common ground urged by W.P.(C) 700/2018 Page 1 … the petition, the common ground urged by W.P.(C) 700/2018 Page 1 of 9 the petitioner is that the respondent/Union of India (hereinafter, “UOI”) ought to

Ajoy Kumar Ghosh Vs. the State of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ElectricityCriminal

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 135 to 140, 150, 151, 151A, 151B, 153 and 154(2); ;Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2007; ;Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Section 39; ;Limitation Act - Section 5; ;Constitution of India - Article 20; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 379; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173 and 460; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act

Reported in : (2008)3CALLT97(HC),2008(1)CHN148,2008CriLJ276

and the Gurap Police Station Case No. 67, dated June 7, 2005 under Section 135(i)(b)(c) of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 read with Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code was registered and that gave rise to G.R. No. … ORDERAshim Kumar Roy, J.1. On June 7. 2005 at around 12 noon the opposite party No. 2 herein Pradip Kumar Chatterjee, Assistant Engineer.(E), S & L.P. Unit, Hooghly (D) Circle, W.B.S.E.B. Taldanga, Chinsurah