Advanced Search Results

The Executive Engineer (Distribution), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 126(5), 126, 126(6), 135 to 139, 153(5), 154, 172, 185, 185(1), 185(2) and 185(5); Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2007; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 49; Electricity Supply Act, 1943; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 6(1); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Article 14; Electricity Rules; Electricity Regulations

Reported in : AIR2008Mad148; (2008)2MLJ812

since it relates to theft of energy, the learned senior Counsel appearing for the consumers would argue that Chapter XIV of the Electricity Act 2003 deals with theft of Electricity, Section 154 of the Act deals with … Court, has disposed of the writ petitions holding as follows:Under the new Section 126(5) and (6) of the Electricity Act, 2003, in respect of the supply other than domestic or agricultural, the maximum period of levy for the assessment … 2002, dated17.6.2002, further directing theauthorities to conduct fresh enquiry.The petitioner further filedW.A. 78 of 21.3.2002 W.P. No. 45234 of 2002, challenging2005 the order passed by

M/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

the Appellants Captive Power Plant (CPP) to consumers other than the captive use is not permissible under Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and accordingly the Appellant should either take distribution license from the Commission under section 12 or seek exemption … is the function of the Regulatory Commission and the State Govt. has a minimum role in that regard. Chapter VII of this Act deals with tariff. In terms of Section 26(2), the Regulatory Commission, in addition to … the Government, it has started the levy of cross subsidy surcharge @ 72 paise on the open access consumers as per the last notified charges

M/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

the Appellant’s Captive Power Plant (CPP) to consumers other than the captive use is not permissible under Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and accordingly the Appellant should either take distribution license from the Commission under section 12 or seek exemption … is the function of the Regulatory Commission and the State Govt. has a minimum role in that regard. Chapter VII of this Act deals with tariff. In terms of Section 26(2), the Regulatory Commission, in addition to … the Government, it has started the levy of cross subsidy surcharge @ 72 paise on the open access consumers as per the last notified charges

Reliance Energy Limited Vs. the Grid Corporation of Orissa

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL267

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Gopal Sao and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

electricity for commercial purposes. In the alternative the petitioners submit that in view of Section 152 of the Electricity Act, 2003 at the most they would be liable to pay Rs. 20,000/- and as 'such Rs. 30,000/- to be … of the electricity being used over the period. He further submitted that Section 152 referred to above under Chapter 14 under the heading Offence and Penalty is an addition to the assessment under 126 of the Electricity … by such person or by any other person benefited by such use. 7. Having given my anxious consideration to the rival contentions as well as

Gopalbhai Chandubhai Rana Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 126, 135, 135(1), 135(1)(A) and 135(1)(C); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 99 to 101, 209, 313 and 374

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4023; (2008)3GLR2026

alias Suresh Amarsinh Gohil were charge-sheeted for the offence punishable under Section 135(1) (A) and (C) of he Electricity Act, 2003 by the learned Special Judge, Kheda at Nadiad which is at Exh.5 in Special Case (GEB) No. 59 … persons and there is no reason to give false evidence against the accused persons. Merely because procedure under Chapter VII of the Criminal Procedure Code Section 99 to 101 is not followed by PW 4 Mr. Bhalsod, … give false evidence against the accused persons. Merely because procedure under Chapter VII of the Criminal Procedure Code Section 99 to 101 is not followed

Executive Engineer Electrical (Nesco) Baripada Ele Vs. Chairperson, Pe ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Education

petition of the applicant-consumer with a direction to approach the appropriate forum provided under Section 42(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003, which is more competent than it to decide/adjudicate the dispute read with the Regulations framed thereunder by the … Ajay Sinha and another decided on 13.05.2008; Rajeev Hitendra Pathak and Ors. 7 vs. Achyt Kashinath Carekar & Another, decided on 19.08.2011 and L.I.C. of … decide the dispute on merit against the will of a party. The basic object and power of enacting Chapter-VIA is to get the dispute settled at the pre-litigation stage. The provisions of Section 22C (8) become redundant

Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. and anr. Vs. Sai Renew ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 61,82(1),86 (1)(a)(b),111(1),125,185,39,172(b),185(3); DevelopersElectricity Reform Act, 1998 - of Section 21 (4)(B); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Section 3,15,17,22; Reform Act, 1998 - Section 11,15(5),21,21(4),11(1)(c)&(e)

th July, 2004. Aggrieved from both these orders the Developers filed independent appeals under Section 111(1) of the Electricity Act, 2003 collectively against the order dated 20th March, 2004 as modified by order dated 7th July, 2004. These appeals … is the function of the Regulatory Commission and the State Govt. has a minimum role in that regard. Chapter VII of this Act deals with tariff. In terms of Section 26(2), the Regulatory Commission, in addition to … was clarified to some extent on this review application vide order dated 7 th July, 2004. Aggrieved from both these orders the Developers filed independent

South East Central Railways Vs. Chhattisgarh State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL461

Tariff has not been adequately addressed in the Tariff Order which is contrary to Section 61(g) of the Electricity Act, 2003 as the Commission has taken no steps to reduce the amount of cross subsidy. The Appellant also made … the year to be passed on to the consumer through a Variable Cost Adjustment Formula as described in Chapter 7. (d) Another important suggestion made by the Appellant to the Commission was that CSEB should undertake measures for

M/S Sarjan Realities Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Maharashtra Electricity ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

on the date of enactment of the Electricity Act, 2003 and held as under in para 1 of Chapter 7(B) on “Determination of wheeling charges and surcharge”. “ The Commission rules that open access transactions on the … contracts, the Commission opined that all open access contracts in existence on the date of enactment of the Electricity Act, 2003 should be honoured to ensure sanctity of the contract. The Commission ruled that all open access transactions on