Advanced Search Results

Paliwal Alloys (Pvt.) Limited Vs. U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3746

an appeal and to deposit an amount of Rs. 10,00,000 along with the appeal as provided under the Electricity Act, 2003 within a period of three weeks and the appellate authority was directed to decide the appeal within a … is in fact second writ petition, which deserves to be dismissed as in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XXII, Rule 7 of the Rules of the Court second application on the same facts is barred. Before … before the Apex Court. On 27.11.2006 the respondents imposed penalty of Rs. 68,31,808 as 'peak hour penalty' for the period 24.11.2002 to 8.2.2003. The petitioner

State of Gujarat Vs. Utility Users Welfare Association Through Its Pre ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

T.C.(C) No.139/2015 T.C.(C) No.138/2015 T.C.(C) No.137/2015 T.C.(C) No.140/2015 C.A. No.3759-3760/2016 T.P.(C) No.974/2016 JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said Page 1 of 84 Act’) provides for Central and State Regulatory Commissions. … Government to constitute a State Transport Authority and Regional Transport Authorities to exercise powers and functions specified in Chapter V. Section 68(2) put a restriction that no person who has a financial interest whether as proprietor, employee

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

determine policy and issue directions etc.); other enactments such as Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India, 2008; The Electricity Act, 2003 (Section 79 and various sub-sections enabling determination of policy, the Tariff, Regulations of Tariffs, facilitation of inter-State transmission … but not under Section 3 of the Act. Hearing on penalty is extended to all other cases under Chapter VI of the Act including for non-cooperation and gun-jumping, but not for penalties in respect of contraventions under … Chairperson would have a casting vote. W.P.(C) 11467/2018 & connected matters Page 68 of 152 93. Speaking about the powers of the SEBI, the Supreme

Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Vs. Delhi Transco Limited Through Its

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

B.S.N.L. Vs. Telecom Regulatory Auth.of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

cannot be used for framing regulation on that topic. Learned senior counsel referred to Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which, according to him, is pari materia to Section 11(2) and argued that in view of paragraph 15 … the order, such of its powers and functions under this Act (except the power to settle dispute under Chapter IV and to make regulation under section36) as it may deem necessary. 35.Power to make rules.- (1) The

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998, a provision similar to sections 68 and 178 of The Electricity Act, 2003. None of the other decisions … been found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue … provisions of the Tariff Regulations,2009 in respect of which amendment is sought for. The Regulations,2009 consists of five chapters covering 59 regulations of which we quote some of them as could be seen hereunder for better appreciation

Small Hydro Power Developers' Vs. Transmission Corporation Of A.P.

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Ajay Maken & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

shall be the duty of the local authority, power generation and distribution companies or any licensee under the Electricity Act, 2003 (36 of 2003) having operations in the area, and any department or undertaking of the Government to render … Constitution, which shall be drafted after having given due consideration to inter alia the fundamental rights contained in Chapter 3 of the Constitution‖ W.P.(C) 11616/2015 Page 41 of 104 socio-economic rights within a Bill of Rights did … Board (DUSIB), which is responsible for governing JJCs estimates there to be 685 JJCs in the city, containing 418,282 jhuggis. In 2014, the DUSIB released

South East Central Railways Vs. Chhattisgarh State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL461

Tariff has not been adequately addressed in the Tariff Order which is contrary to Section 61(g) of the Electricity Act, 2003 as the Commission has taken no steps to reduce the amount of cross subsidy. The Appellant also made … the year to be passed on to the consumer through a Variable Cost Adjustment Formula as described in Chapter 7. (d) Another important suggestion made by the Appellant to the Commission was that CSEB should undertake measures … Rs. 46 crores only. This, in effect, resulted in reduction of Rs. 68 crores in the ARR.10. It was represented by CSEB that the Commission

Bharti Cellular Limited Vs. Department of Tele-communicaitons

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

to Section 34 (3) of the 1996 Act. It was further submitted that unlike Section 174 of the Electricity Act, 2003 which was a non-obstante clause, Section 14 of the TRAI Act was not and therefore, the decision in … (‘TRAI Amendment Act’) came into force with retrospective effect from 24th January 2000. The TRAI Amendment Act inserted Chapter IV in the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 (‘TRAI Act’). Under Section 14 of the TRAI … having allowed EGTL to enter into contracts or commitments with third parties. 68. There is merit in the submission of the learned counsel for BML