Advanced Search Results
Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Others Vs. Union ...
Delhi
Aug-04-2016
Education
vs. GNCTD and Ors.Policy Directions dated 12.06.2015 issued by the Department of Power, GNCTD under Section 108 of Electricity Act, 2003 without placing before the Lieutenant Governor for his views/concurrence.8.W.P.(C) No.348/2016Ramakant Kumar vs. GNCTDNotification dated 22.12.2015 issued by the … the Union Territories for the purposes of their administration, we shall in brief refer to the provisions of Chapter I of Part V of the Constitution that deals with the Executive of Union. 44. In order to … Senior Advocate who appeared on behalf of the applicant in C.M. Nos. 5182/2016 and 5183/2016 in W.P.(C) No.5888/2015 in which the applicant sought for impleadment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.P. Gas Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commis ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-27-2005
Electricity
Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2, 2(8), 2(10), 2(22), 2(28), 2(29), 2(30), 2(32), 2(36), 2(49), 2(50), 2(67), 2(75), 9, 9(1), 9(2), 14, 39, 39(1), 39(2), 39(4), 40, 42, 42(2), 49, 62(1), 76 to 109, 158, 176, 181, 391 and 391(2); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998; Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Andhra Pradesh Act, 2003; Electricity Rules, 2005 - Rule 3
AIR2006AP12; 2005(6)ALD368
O.P.(SR) No. 19 of 2004 was filed by A.P. Transmission Corporation Limited (A.P.TRANSCO) under Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (the Act, for brevity) seeking orders from APERC to direct APGPCL to allocate surrendered energy to A.P.TRANSCO from … study into various aspects submitted its report in April, 1995. The conclusions of the study are found in Chapter X of the report. While recommending restructuring of A.P. State Electricity Board, it was suggested to unbundle the … the ownership is held by the captive users and not less than 51 per cent of the aggregate electricity generated is consumed for captive use.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Gujarat Vs. Utility Users Welfare Association Through Its Pre ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-12-2018
Land Acquisition
T.C.(C) No.139/2015 T.C.(C) No.138/2015 T.C.(C) No.137/2015 T.C.(C) No.140/2015 C.A. No.3759-3760/2016 T.P.(C) No.974/2016 JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said Page 1 of 84 Act’) provides for Central and State Regulatory Commissions. … Government to constitute a State Transport Authority and Regional Transport Authorities to exercise powers and functions specified in Chapter V. Section 68(2) put a restriction that no person who has a financial interest whether as proprietor, employee … the said Act sought to emphasise that the same was a Page 51 of 84 “notwithstanding” clause as is apparent from its bare reading and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.
Delhi
Apr-10-2019
MRTP
determine policy and issue directions etc.); other enactments such as Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India, 2008; The Electricity Act, 2003 (Section 79 and various sub-sections enabling determination of policy, the Tariff, Regulations of Tariffs, facilitation of inter-State transmission … but not under Section 3 of the Act. Hearing on penalty is extended to all other cases under Chapter VI of the Act including for non-cooperation and gun-jumping, but not for penalties in respect of contraventions under … the duties imposed on it by W.P.(C) 11467/2018 & connected matters Page 51 of 152 the Commission or under the provisions of this Act and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNabha Power Limited Vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-05-2024
Land Acquisition
Proposal (RFP). The RFP was for selection of developers through tariff-based bidding process under Section 63 of the Electricity Act 2003, for procurement of power on long-term basis from the power station to be set up at village Nalash, … for the person in question to have the right (see Salmond on 51 Jurisprudence, Twelfth Edition P.J.Fitzgeral page 245). It is only when the right … part of the 01.03.2002 notification. “Exemption and effective rates of basic and additional duty for specified goods of Chapters 1 to 99.-. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbhay Tyagi Vs. State (Delhi Admn.) and anr.
Delhi
Mar-03-2009
Electricity
Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 18, 37, 39, 53 and 67 to 69; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379, 419, 420, 467 and 468; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 50, 61, 121, 126, 126(6), 135 to 138, 151, 154, 154(5), 155, 174, 183, 185, 185(2) and 332; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 69(1); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 322, 332, 466A, 467 and 469; Delhi Electricity Rules Act, 2005; Delhi Electricity Reforms Commission Act, 2000; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 4, 4(2), 154, 173, 190(1), 195, 195(1), 200, 340 and 482; Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commissions (Performance standards, metering and billing) Regulation, 2002 -
2009LC(DEL)32
case may also be passed. 3. It is the submission of the petitioner that after the enactment of Electricity Act 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the New Act) which repealed the Indian Electricity Act 1910 as well as Delhi … Electricity Act have to be tried according to the procedure contained in the Cr.P.C. and, therefore, provisions of Chapter XII containing Section 154 Cr.P.C. onward becomes applicable.6. Arguments were heard in this case at length on 07.12.2009
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnil Soni Vs. Union of India and anr.
Delhi
Oct-21-2013
MRTP
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Interpretation of sub-Section 2 of Section 77 of The Electricity Act, 2003, falls for consideration in the two captioned petitions. Two additional issues, the first pertaining to Dr.R.K.Pachauri, alleged to … with a statutory requirement, it normally need not be a formal one, governed by the requirements discussed in Chapters 6 and 7. The characterization of an administrative act as legislative instead of judicial is thus of great
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd. Vs. Essar Power Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-13-2008
ArbitrationElectricity
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(3), 11, 11(5) and 11(6); Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganization and Regulation) Act, 2003; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 79, 79(1), 86(1), 94(2), 158, 173, 174 and 175; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Mimansa Rules; State Grid Code; Constitution of India - Article 14; Arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance, 1996
AIR2008SC1921; 2008(2)ARBLR1(SC); 2008(2)AWC1238(SC); (2008)2CompLJ357(SC); 2008(4)CTC539; 2008LC(SC)1; (2008)3GLR2246(SC); JT2008(3)SC336; (2008)4MLJ573(SC); (2008)4SCC75; 2008AIRSCW2169
Ahmedabad (hereinafter in short 'the Commission') by Application No. 873 of 2005 made under Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter in short 'the Act of 2003').8. Since the Nigam did not send its approval for appointment of … of dealing with conflicts which have been fully discussed by Shabar Swami in his commentary on Sutra 14, Chapter III, Book III of Jaimini.(1) Where two texts which are apparently conflicting are capable of being reconciled, then … parties agreed, inter alia, that out of the total generating capacity of 515MW electricity the appellant-company would allocate 300MW electricity to the Board and 215MW
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Power Company Limited Vs. Reliance Energy Limited
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Dec-13-2006
Electricity
(2007)LCAPTEL1080
Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskClariant International Ltd. and anr. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-25-2004
Civil
Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 2(2), 4(1), 4(3), 5(1), 5(2), 11, 11B, 14, 14(2), 14A, 14A(7), 15M(2), 15Z, 18(5) and 24; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 2, 10, 12, 14(3), 16, 20, 21, 21(6), 22(12), 44 and 45; Unit Trust of India Act, 1963; Companies Act, 1956; Unit Trust of India (Transfer of Undertaking and Repeal) Act, 2002 - Sections 7; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956; Depositors Act, 1996; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 34(1) and 34(2); Companies Act, 1913; Motor Vehicles Act; Planning and Compensation Act, 1991; Corporate Law Economic Reform Programme Act, 1999; Corporation Act, 2001; Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997
AIR2004SC4236; IV(2004)BC449; [2004]122CompCas112(SC); (2004)4CompLJ52(SC); JT2004(7)SC69; (2004)4MLJ122(SC); 2004(7)SCALE180; (2004)8SCC524; [2004]54SCL519(SC); 2005(1)LC1
Court in West Bengal Electricity Regulation Commission (supra).85. We may furthermore notice that in Part XI of the Electricity Act, 2003, an expert appellate tribunal for electricity in the light of the observations made by this Court has been … the law.68. O. Hood Phillips in his 'Constitutional and Administrative Law', Eight Edition, at page 686 under the Chapter 'Tribunals' has stated as follows :-'These are independent statutory tribunals whose function is judicial. The tribunals are so … to 20.6.2003 A B C 15% 5916.35 253.92 14% 5521.93 237.00 13% 5127.51 220.07 12% 4733.08 203.14 11% 4338.66 186.21 10% 3944.24 169.28 9% 3549.81
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »