Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: electricity act 2003 chapter 50 · Page 1 of about 973 results (0.057 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 14 2013

Executive Engineer Electrical (Nesco) Baripada Ele Vs. Chairperson, Pe ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-14-2013

Subject : Education

petition of the applicant-consumer with a direction to approach the appropriate forum provided under Section 42(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003, which is more competent than it to decide/adjudicate the dispute read with the Regulations framed thereunder by the … decide the dispute on merit against the will of a party. The basic object and power of enacting Chapter-VIA is to get the dispute settled at the pre-litigation stage. The provisions of Section 22C (8) become redundant … Ors. 7 vs. Achyt Kashinath Carekar & Another, decided on 19.08.2011 and L.I.C. of India vs. Suresh Kumar, (2011) 7 SCC 491.6. Mr. A.K. Biswal,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 2011

B.T.Kokila Vs. the Chairman, Tamilnadu Electricity and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-23-2011

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code - Regulation 23(AA); Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 135; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21

the cases on hand, barring one or two, are cases in which proceedings under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, have been initiated. 3. In some cases, the petitioners have come up with writ petitions, immediately after provisional … can be an assessment. 15. In accordance with the provisions of Section 50 read with Section 181, the Supply Code 2004 was issued by the … appellate and revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 156, in a manner similar to those prescribed by Chapters 29 and 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 21. An interesting facet of Sections 154 to 156

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2009

Maruti Suzuki Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-iii

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-17-2009

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 - Rules 2, 3(1), 6, 6(1) and 14; Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4 and 4(2); Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 66 and 136; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 157; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 91, 93, 95; Central Excise Rules, 2000 - Rules 3(1), 7, 9 and 16(2); CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

Reported in : 2009(168)LC87(SC); 2009(240)ELT641(SC); JT2009(11)SC8; 2009(11)SCALE446; (2009)9SCC193; [2009]18STJ323(SC); [2009]22STT54; 2009(7)LC3257(SC)

Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules,-(a) a first or second stage dealer, dealing exclusively in goods falling under Chapter 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 or 63 of the First Schedule … Assessee has installed three gas turbines in their factory for generation of electricity. All the three turbines have capacity to generate electricity of 20 MW … (iii), (iv) and (v) above; andvii. the additional duty of excise leviable under Section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003), paid on any inputs or capital goods received in the factory on or after the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 04 2016

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Others Vs. Union ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-04-2016

Subject : Education

vs. GNCTD and Ors.Policy Directions dated 12.06.2015 issued by the Department of Power, GNCTD under Section 108 of Electricity Act, 2003 without placing before the Lieutenant Governor for his views/concurrence.8.W.P.(C) No.348/2016Ramakant Kumar vs. GNCTDNotification dated 22.12.2015 issued by the … the Union Territories for the purposes of their administration, we shall in brief refer to the provisions of Chapter I of Part V of the Constitution that deals with the Executive of Union. 44. In order to … SCC 602, Chiranji Lal Shrilal Goenka v. Jasjit Singh; (1993) 2 SCC 507, Gujarat Maritime Board v. G.C. Pandya; (2015) 12 SCC 403 and Ariane

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2008

Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd. Vs. Essar Power Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-13-2008

Subject : ArbitrationElectricity

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(3), 11, 11(5) and 11(6); Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganization and Regulation) Act, 2003; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 79, 79(1), 86(1), 94(2), 158, 173, 174 and 175; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Mimansa Rules; State Grid Code; Constitution of India - Article 14; Arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance, 1996

Reported in : AIR2008SC1921; 2008(2)ARBLR1(SC); 2008(2)AWC1238(SC); (2008)2CompLJ357(SC); 2008(4)CTC539; 2008LC(SC)1; (2008)3GLR2246(SC); JT2008(3)SC336; (2008)4MLJ573(SC); (2008)4SCC75; 2008AIRSCW2169

Ahmedabad (hereinafter in short 'the Commission') by Application No. 873 of 2005 made under Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter in short 'the Act of 2003').8. Since the Nigam did not send its approval for appointment of … of all meaning, or some part of the statute may become absurd. 50. In the chapter on `Exceptional Construction' in his book on `Interpretation of … of dealing with conflicts which have been fully discussed by Shabar Swami in his commentary on Sutra 14, Chapter III, Book III of Jaimini.(1) Where two texts which are apparently conflicting are capable of being reconciled, then

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2022

Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. Thomas Joseph Alias Thomas M. J.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-16-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

being not by any artificial means or through the tampered meter, the assessment under Section 126(6) of the Electricity Act 2003 (for short, ‘the Act 2003’) could only be called to twice the fixed charges payable and such consumer … electricity” means the usage of electricity as explained in Section 126 of the Act;50. Regulation 153 falls within Chapter IX of the Code 2014. Chapter IX is in respect of theft, unauthorised use and other irregularities. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2018

State of Gujarat Vs. Utility Users Welfare Association Through Its Pre ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-12-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

T.C.(C) No.139/2015 T.C.(C) No.138/2015 T.C.(C) No.137/2015 T.C.(C) No.140/2015 C.A. No.3759-3760/2016 T.P.(C) No.974/2016 JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said Page 1 of 84 Act’) provides for Central and State Regulatory Commissions. … of the said Act makes provision for power to recover expenditure. Section 50 provides for the State Commission to specify an Electricity Supply Code for … Government to constitute a State Transport Authority and Regional Transport Authorities to exercise powers and functions specified in Chapter V. Section 68(2) put a restriction that no person who has a financial interest whether as proprietor, employee

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2006

Bbn Industries Association and Vs. H.P. Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Aug-21-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL806

2004, which have been framed by Central Electricity Authority (CEA) in exercise of power under Section 73 of Electricity Act, 2003. Chapter IV set out the grid connectivity standards applicable to Distribution Systems and Chapter V prescribes the Grid Connectivity … grounds set out herein in this appeal. (b) Quash the levy of the Harmonic Injection Penalty of Rs. 500 per KW of connected load per month. (c) Quash the levy of reform surcharge of 5 per cent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2013

B.S.N.L. Vs. Telecom Regulatory Auth.of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-06-2013

Subject : Service Tax

cannot be used for framing regulation on that topic. Learned senior counsel referred to Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which, according to him, is pari materia to Section 11(2) and argued that in view of paragraph 15 … the order, such of its powers and functions under this Act (except the power to settle dispute under Chapter IV and to make regulation under section36) as it may deem necessary. 35.Power to make rules.- (1) The … be shared between BSNL and the private operator in the ratio of 50:50 for international roaming calls. COAI filed representations dated 31.1.2005, 7.2.2005, 8.2.2005 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2012

Tarini Infrastructure Limited Vs. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. Though ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-31-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial