Advanced Search Results

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

been found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue … provisions of the Tariff Regulations,2009 in respect of which amendment is sought for. The Regulations,2009 consists of five chapters covering 59 regulations of which we quote some of them as could be seen hereunder for better appreciation … 25.46 38.82 40.05 2. Pench 29.17 56.75 92.46 61.99 3. Bargi 69.16 43.30 38.32 48.78 4 Bansagar-1 96.46 66.03 80.92 80.05 5 Banasagar-II 44.75 43.43

State of Gujarat Vs. Utility Users Welfare Association Through Its Pre ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

T.C.(C) No.139/2015 T.C.(C) No.138/2015 T.C.(C) No.137/2015 T.C.(C) No.140/2015 C.A. No.3759-3760/2016 T.P.(C) No.974/2016 JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said Page 1 of 84 Act’) provides for Central and State Regulatory Commissions. … i.e., distancing the regulating body from the Government. Page 36 of 84 43. Learned Senior Counsel referred to the Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 to … Government to constitute a State Transport Authority and Regional Transport Authorities to exercise powers and functions specified in Chapter V. Section 68(2) put a restriction that no person who has a financial interest whether as proprietor, employee

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. a Company Incorporated U ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 1(2); Constitution of India - Article 145(1), 225, 226, 227 and 246(2); Electricity Act, 1948; Electricity Act, 2003; Indian Elactricity Rule - Rules 7, 9 and 17; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 26(6)and 36(2); Karnataka Electricity (Reforms) Act, 1999 - Sections 40, 41, 56, 57, 57(2) and 57(3); Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (General Conduct of Proceedings) Regulation, 2000 - Regulations 40, 42, 43,44 and 56; Limitation Act - Sections 29(2) and 75(2)

Reported in : 2008(1)KarLJ106; ILR2007(4)Kar3956; 2007(4)KCCRSN245; 2007(6)AIRKarR33(DB)

learned Single Judge:5. The learned Single Judge, taking into account the submission made that, the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, now takes care of various possibilities, the grievance of the appellant, regarding stipulation of limitation, prescribed by the … had filed the writ petition seeking the following prayers: To,(a) declare Regulation 43 of the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (General Conduct of Proceedings) Regulations 2000, … of its functions under 'the Act'. The Commission by virtue of the said provision, has framed the 'Regulations'. Chapter IV of the Regulations, is with respect to appeals from electrical inspectorate. Regulation 42 is with respect to

Smt. S.Padma Vs. Central Electricity Supply Utility (Cesu), Odisha,

Court : Orissa

Subject : Education

(2011) 6 Supreme 1 referring to sub-section (1) of Section 42 and sub-Section (1) of Sec. 43 of Electricity Act, 2003 held that the provisions in the Electricity Act, 2003 make it amply clear that a distribution licensee has … reproduce the relevant portion of Section 42(1) and Section 43(1) of the Act, 2003 and relevant Regulations of Chapter III of the Code, 2004 which deal with power supply. Relevant portions of Sections 42(1) and 43(1) of

Smt. Kalpana Guha Vs. Nesco, Odisha Rep.Through Its Managing Director, ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Land Acquisition

(2011) 6 Supreme 1 referring to sub-section (1) of Section 42 and sub-Section (1) of Sec. 43 of Electricity Act, 2003 held that the provisions in the Electricity Act, 2003 make it amply clear that a distribution licensee has … reproduce the relevant portion of Section 42(1) and Section 43(1) of the Act, 2003 and relevant regulation of Chapter III of the Code, 2004 which deals with power supply. Relevant portion of Sections 42(1) and 43(1) of

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

determine policy and issue directions etc.); other enactments such as Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India, 2008; The Electricity Act, 2003 (Section 79 and various sub-sections enabling determination of policy, the Tariff, Regulations of Tariffs, facilitation of inter-State transmission … but not under Section 3 of the Act. Hearing on penalty is extended to all other cases under Chapter VI of the Act including for non-cooperation and gun-jumping, but not for penalties in respect of contraventions under … is in conformity with the established W.P.(C) 11467/2018 & connected matters Page 43 of 152 legislative norms and do not require any judicial review merely

B.S.N.L. Vs. Telecom Regulatory Auth.of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

cannot be used for framing regulation on that topic. Learned senior counsel referred to Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which, according to him, is pari materia to Section 11(2) and argued that in view of paragraph 15 … the order, such of its powers and functions under this Act (except the power to settle dispute under Chapter IV and to make regulation under section36) as it may deem necessary. 35.Power to make rules.- (1) The

Reliance Energy Limited Vs. the Tata Power Company Limited and

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL662

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; Section 56, Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006; Section 154, Electricity Act, 2003; Section 27 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997; Section 61 of the Competition Act, 2002. … was of the firm opinion that the tribunals should be a real substitute to High Courts. While scrutinizing Chapter II of the Act which dealt with the establishment of tribunals, this Court expressed its view that a … be clearly informed that 31 358 U.S. 1 (1958) 32 384 U.S. 436 (1966) 37 | Pa ge he has the right to consult with

Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd. Vs. Essar Power Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationElectricity

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(3), 11, 11(5) and 11(6); Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganization and Regulation) Act, 2003; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 79, 79(1), 86(1), 94(2), 158, 173, 174 and 175; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Mimansa Rules; State Grid Code; Constitution of India - Article 14; Arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance, 1996

Reported in : AIR2008SC1921; 2008(2)ARBLR1(SC); 2008(2)AWC1238(SC); (2008)2CompLJ357(SC); 2008(4)CTC539; 2008LC(SC)1; (2008)3GLR2246(SC); JT2008(3)SC336; (2008)4MLJ573(SC); (2008)4SCC75; 2008AIRSCW2169

Ahmedabad (hereinafter in short 'the Commission') by Application No. 873 of 2005 made under Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter in short 'the Act of 2003').8. Since the Nigam did not send its approval for appointment of … of dealing with conflicts which have been fully discussed by Shabar Swami in his commentary on Sutra 14, Chapter III, Book III of Jaimini.(1) Where two texts which are apparently conflicting are capable of being reconciled, then … or out of place in the Vikriti Yagya, are to be omitted. 43. For example, in the Rajsuya Yagya, certain homas are prescribed, for the