Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: electricity act 2003 chapter 42 · Page 1 of about 519 results (0.092 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 30 2012

Smt. S.Padma Vs. Central Electricity Supply Utility (Cesu), Odisha,

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Nov-30-2012

Subject : Education

(2011) 6 Supreme 1 referring to sub-section (1) of Section 42 and sub-Section (1) of Sec. 43 of Electricity Act, 2003 held that the provisions in the Electricity Act, 2003 make it amply clear that a distribution licensee has … reproduce the relevant portion of Section 42(1) and Section 43(1) of the Act, 2003 and relevant Regulations of Chapter III of the Code, 2004 which deal with power supply. Relevant portions of Sections 42(1) and 43(1) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2012

Smt. Kalpana Guha Vs. Nesco, Odisha Rep.Through Its Managing Director, ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-26-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

(2011) 6 Supreme 1 referring to sub-section (1) of Section 42 and sub-Section (1) of Sec. 43 of Electricity Act, 2003 held that the provisions in the Electricity Act, 2003 make it amply clear that a distribution licensee has … reproduce the relevant portion of Section 42(1) and Section 43(1) of the Act, 2003 and relevant regulation of Chapter III of the Code, 2004 which deals with power supply. Relevant portion of Sections 42(1) and 43(1) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2010

In the Matter Of: Damodar Valley Corporation Vs. Central Electricity R ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-10-2010

Subject : Direct Taxation

in the year 2003, w.e.f. 10.06.2003. Under this Act, the DVC was brought under the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 for electricity business. In view of the said Act, the tariff of the DVC for generation and inter-State … but the provisions under sections 12(b), 30, 31, 34, 35, 37 to 42 and 44 are not inconsistent with the Electricity Act and therefore these … given by the Tribunal. It is also strenuously contended by the learned Senior counsel for the Appellant that Chapter IV of the DVC Act, even as per the findings of the Tribunal, is entirely applicable but the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 06 2009

Tata Power Company Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commiss ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-2009

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3, 5, 12, 22(1), 22B and 22B(1); Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(17), 2(4), 2(70), 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 10(3), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 12, 12(2), 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 33, 55(2), 55(3), 42, 42(2), 60, 62(1), 62(2), 62(95), 73, 76(1), 81(1), 81(2), 82, 83, 86, 86(1), 125, 128(1), 128(6), 128(7), 128(8), 129 and 181; Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1959; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 22(1) and 22; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 43, 43A, 44, 46 and 49; Reforms Act; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Income and Corporation Taxes Act, 1970 - Sections 488; Companies Act - Sections 255 and 256; Constitution of India - Article 19(1); MERC (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulati

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR2966; 2009LC(SC)246; 2009(5)LC2440(SC)

view of the prevailing supply shortage situation, the Commission has invoked its powers under Section 23 of the Electricity Act 2003, and has directed the distribution licensees to share the available generation capacity in a particular ratio, based on … Regulation 24 of the MERC (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2005 42. In conclusion the Commission held that Section 86(1)(b) of the 2003 Act … object it seeks to achieve wherefor the Commission and the Tribunal were not only required to consider the chapter headings but also the marginal notes.v) Principles of harmonious construction of the provisions of the statutes having not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : MRTP

determine policy and issue directions etc.); other enactments such as Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India, 2008; The Electricity Act, 2003 (Section 79 and various sub-sections enabling determination of policy, the Tariff, Regulations of Tariffs, facilitation of inter-State transmission … but not under Section 3 of the Act. Hearing on penalty is extended to all other cases under Chapter VI of the Act including for non-cooperation and gun-jumping, but not for penalties in respect of contraventions under … See Columbia Broadcasting System v. United States, 316 U.S. 407, 316 U.S. 421.‖ Hence we refuse to say that the Commission, which had not previously

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2011

The Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association, Represented Dindigul, and O ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Jan-11-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

in January, 2010 praying for punishing the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board under Sections 142 and 146 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for having levied the penalty for exceeding the quota during evening peak hours in violation of Rule 38 … to the Appellants, Section 23 of the Act cannot be pressed into service as it finds place in Chapter IV of the Act which deals with Licensing only. Section 23 of The 2003 Act empowers the State … open access has been permitted to a category of consumers under section 42, the State Commission shall determine only the wheeling charges and surcharge thereon,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2012

Tarini Infrastructure Limited Vs. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. Though ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-31-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2008

Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd. Vs. Essar Power Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-13-2008

Subject : ArbitrationElectricity

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(3), 11, 11(5) and 11(6); Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganization and Regulation) Act, 2003; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 79, 79(1), 86(1), 94(2), 158, 173, 174 and 175; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Mimansa Rules; State Grid Code; Constitution of India - Article 14; Arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance, 1996

Reported in : AIR2008SC1921; 2008(2)ARBLR1(SC); 2008(2)AWC1238(SC); (2008)2CompLJ357(SC); 2008(4)CTC539; 2008LC(SC)1; (2008)3GLR2246(SC); JT2008(3)SC336; (2008)4MLJ573(SC); (2008)4SCC75; 2008AIRSCW2169

Ahmedabad (hereinafter in short 'the Commission') by Application No. 873 of 2005 made under Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter in short 'the Act of 2003').8. Since the Nigam did not send its approval for appointment of … of dealing with conflicts which have been fully discussed by Shabar Swami in his commentary on Sutra 14, Chapter III, Book III of Jaimini.(1) Where two texts which are apparently conflicting are capable of being reconciled, then … open access has been permitted to a category of consumers under Section 42, the State Commission shall determine only the wheeling charges and surcharge thereon,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 2024

Nabha Power Limited Vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-05-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

Proposal (RFP). The RFP was for selection of developers through tariff-based bidding process under Section 63 of the Electricity Act 2003, for procurement of power on long-term basis from the power station to be set up at village Nalash, … 86 for setting up of any Mega Power Project specified in List 42, if such Mega Power Project is - (a) an inter- State thermal … part of the 01.03.2002 notification. “Exemption and effective rates of basic and additional duty for specified goods of Chapters 1 to 99.-. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2013

B.S.N.L. Vs. Telecom Regulatory Auth.of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-06-2013

Subject : Service Tax

cannot be used for framing regulation on that topic. Learned senior counsel referred to Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which, according to him, is pari materia to Section 11(2) and argued that in view of paragraph 15 … the order, such of its powers and functions under this Act (except the power to settle dispute under Chapter IV and to make regulation under section36) as it may deem necessary. 35.Power to make rules.- (1) The … to 12 while framing their own rules under Section 15(1).” (emphasis supplied) 42. The same proposition has been reiterated in Academy of Nutrition Improvement v.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial