Advanced Search Results

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; Section 56, Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006; Section 154, Electricity Act, 2003; Section 27 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997; Section 61 of the Competition Act, 2002. … was of the firm opinion that the tribunals should be a real substitute to High Courts. While scrutinizing Chapter II of the Act which dealt with the establishment of tribunals, this Court expressed its view that a … would, thus, be unconstitutional. Judicial decisions and legislative overruling I. Comparative Jurisdictions 33. It would be profitable to refer to the reaction of courts to

Delta International Limited and Others Vs. Smt. Nupur Mitra and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Miscellaneous

and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, Section 23 of the Depositories Act, 1996, Section 145 of the Electricity Act, 2003, Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013, to name a few, are examples of similar provisions along with … to in sub-section (4) of section 13 taken by the secured creditor or his authorised officer under this Chapter, may make an application alongwith such fee, as may be prescribed to the Debts Recovery Tribunal having jurisdiction

B.S.N.L. Vs. Telecom Regulatory Auth.of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

cannot be used for framing regulation on that topic. Learned senior counsel referred to Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which, according to him, is pari materia to Section 11(2) and argued that in view of paragraph 15 … the order, such of its powers and functions under this Act (except the power to settle dispute under Chapter IV and to make regulation under section36) as it may deem necessary. 35.Power to make rules.- (1) The … other related services.19. The Preamble and Sections 3, 11 to 14, 18, 33, 35, 36 and 37 of the Act (unamended) read as under:“Preamble An

Tarini Infrastructure Limited Vs. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. Though ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Shahnaz Ayurvedics Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 35C and 37B; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : 2004(173)ELT337(All)

MOD-II, New Delhi and finally vide order dated 29-9-1994. The products stood classified under Chapter 30 and not Chapter 33 of the Tariff Act 1985, holding the same to be Ayurvedic medicines and not Cosmetics. Similar remained the … and Ors. : [1988]2SCR759 ; R.S.R.T.C. and Anr. v. Krishna Kant and Ors. : (1995)IILLJ728SC ; Kerala State Electricity Board and Anr. v. Kurien E. Kalathil and Ors. : AIR2000SC2573 ; A. Venkatasubbiah Naidu v. S. Chellappan … of remedy.17. In T.K. Rangarajan v. Government of Tamil Nadu and Ors., 2003 AIR SCW 3807, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that ordinarily the writ

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

been found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue … No. 10 MSEB (Holding Co) and Maharashtra State Transmission Company Limited has 33% share in the Pench Hydro Station, both operated by the appellant. 4. … provisions of the Tariff Regulations,2009 in respect of which amendment is sought for. The Regulations,2009 consists of five chapters covering 59 regulations of which we quote some of them as could be seen hereunder for better appreciation

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

determine policy and issue directions etc.); other enactments such as Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India, 2008; The Electricity Act, 2003 (Section 79 and various sub-sections enabling determination of policy, the Tariff, Regulations of Tariffs, facilitation of inter-State transmission … but not under Section 3 of the Act. Hearing on penalty is extended to all other cases under Chapter VI of the Act including for non-cooperation and gun-jumping, but not for penalties in respect of contraventions under … demonstrable from its powers and functions, having regard to Sections 27, 28, 33, 36 and 61 and Regulations 10, 12(2), 15, 24-28, 31, 32, 39,

Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd. Vs. Essar Power Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationElectricity

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(3), 11, 11(5) and 11(6); Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganization and Regulation) Act, 2003; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 79, 79(1), 86(1), 94(2), 158, 173, 174 and 175; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Mimansa Rules; State Grid Code; Constitution of India - Article 14; Arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance, 1996

Reported in : AIR2008SC1921; 2008(2)ARBLR1(SC); 2008(2)AWC1238(SC); (2008)2CompLJ357(SC); 2008(4)CTC539; 2008LC(SC)1; (2008)3GLR2246(SC); JT2008(3)SC336; (2008)4MLJ573(SC); (2008)4SCC75; 2008AIRSCW2169

Ahmedabad (hereinafter in short 'the Commission') by Application No. 873 of 2005 made under Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter in short 'the Act of 2003').8. Since the Nigam did not send its approval for appointment of … of dealing with conflicts which have been fully discussed by Shabar Swami in his commentary on Sutra 14, Chapter III, Book III of Jaimini.(1) Where two texts which are apparently conflicting are capable of being reconciled, then … It is well settled that the special law overrides the general law. 33. It is well settled that where a statute provides for a thing

Paliwal Alloys (Pvt.) Limited Vs. U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3746

an appeal and to deposit an amount of Rs. 10,00,000 along with the appeal as provided under the Electricity Act, 2003 within a period of three weeks and the appellate authority was directed to decide the appeal within a … is in fact second writ petition, which deserves to be dismissed as in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XXII, Rule 7 of the Rules of the Court second application on the same facts is barred. Before … petition at the Lucknow Bench of this Court being Writ Petition No. 3393 (MS) of 2008 praying for following relief:(i) Issue writ, order or direction

In the Matter of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Li ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

charges and losses) Regulations,2010 (ISTS Regulations), after following the due process as contemplated under Section 178(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003. 5. As per the ISTS Regulations dated 15.6.2010, the 2nd Respondent National Load Despatch Centre (NLDC) was designated … Act and that therefore, the Appeal is maintainable. 22. Tariff of the inter-State transmission system is fixed under Chapters 3 and 4 of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations 2009 ( “Tariff … framed under Section 61 read with Section 178(2)(s) of the Act. Regulation 33 of the Tariff Regulations dealt with sharing of inter-State transmission charges determined