Advanced Search Results

Kishor S/O Ravindra Zope and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Thro ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Electricity Act, 2003, provides functions, powers and procedure of the Appropriate Commission. 11. Thus, there is a clear impression created by the provisions and the … under the provisions of Rule 3 of the Works of Licencees Rules, 2006 (made under the provisions of Electricity Act, 2003) (henceforth the Rules) and secured such permission on 31st May, 2011. The Collector admittedly is the authority who … thus clear that the appropriate authority has conferred all powers which are available to the Telegraph Authority under Chapter-III of the said Act stood conferred on respondent No.3. 10. Besides this, under the relevant provisions of the

M/S Sarjan Realities Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Maharashtra Electricity ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

on the date of enactment of the Electricity Act, 2003 and held as under in para 1 of Chapter 7(B) on “Determination of wheeling charges and surcharge”. “ The Commission rules that open access transactions on the … contracts, the Commission opined that all open access contracts in existence on the date of enactment of the Electricity Act, 2003 should be honoured to ensure sanctity of the contract. The Commission ruled that all open access transactions on … passed by the Commission or Government of Maharashtra or Government of India. 11. The Commission issued a Tariff Order on 20.10.2006 dealing with tariff for

B.T.Kokila Vs. the Chairman, Tamilnadu Electricity and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code - Regulation 23(AA); Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 135; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21

the cases on hand, barring one or two, are cases in which proceedings under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, have been initiated. 3. In some cases, the petitioners have come up with writ petitions, immediately after provisional … supply of electricity was authorised”, has also been made an unauthorised use. 11. Two interesting arguments are advanced by some of the learned counsel for … appellate and revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 156, in a manner similar to those prescribed by Chapters 29 and 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 21. An interesting facet of Sections 154 to 156

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Others Vs. Union ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

vs. GNCTD and Ors.Policy Directions dated 12.06.2015 issued by the Department of Power, GNCTD under Section 108 of Electricity Act, 2003 without placing before the Lieutenant Governor for his views/concurrence.8.W.P.(C) No.348/2016Ramakant Kumar vs. GNCTDNotification dated 22.12.2015 issued by the … the Union Territories for the purposes of their administration, we shall in brief refer to the provisions of Chapter I of Part V of the Constitution that deals with the Executive of Union. 44. In order to … against officials of Central Government.2.W.P.(C) No.7887/2015Rajender Prashad vs. GNCTD and Ors.Notification dated 11.08.2015 issued by the Directorate of Vigilance, GNCTD under the Commissions of Inquiry

Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd. Vs. Essar Power Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationElectricity

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(3), 11, 11(5) and 11(6); Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganization and Regulation) Act, 2003; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 79, 79(1), 86(1), 94(2), 158, 173, 174 and 175; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Mimansa Rules; State Grid Code; Constitution of India - Article 14; Arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance, 1996

Reported in : AIR2008SC1921; 2008(2)ARBLR1(SC); 2008(2)AWC1238(SC); (2008)2CompLJ357(SC); 2008(4)CTC539; 2008LC(SC)1; (2008)3GLR2246(SC); JT2008(3)SC336; (2008)4MLJ573(SC); (2008)4SCC75; 2008AIRSCW2169

Ahmedabad (hereinafter in short 'the Commission') by Application No. 873 of 2005 made under Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter in short 'the Act of 2003').8. Since the Nigam did not send its approval for appointment of … of dealing with conflicts which have been fully discussed by Shabar Swami in his commentary on Sutra 14, Chapter III, Book III of Jaimini.(1) Where two texts which are apparently conflicting are capable of being reconciled, then … High Court dated 15.6.2006 which was passed on a petition under Section 11(5) and (6) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter in short

The Executive Engineer (Distribution), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 126(5), 126, 126(6), 135 to 139, 153(5), 154, 172, 185, 185(1), 185(2) and 185(5); Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2007; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 49; Electricity Supply Act, 1943; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 6(1); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Article 14; Electricity Rules; Electricity Regulations

Reported in : AIR2008Mad148; (2008)2MLJ812

since it relates to theft of energy, the learned senior Counsel appearing for the consumers would argue that Chapter XIV of the Electricity Act 2003 deals with theft of Electricity, Section 154 of the Act deals with … Court, has disposed of the writ petitions holding as follows:Under the new Section 126(5) and (6) of the Electricity Act, 2003, in respect of the supply other than domestic or agricultural, the maximum period of levy for the assessment … up for hearing before a Division Bench of the Madurai Bench on 11.9.2006, since it was represented by the Counsel appearing on either side that

V.B.R. Menon Vs. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Chennai and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

impugned Final Assessment Order No.AEE/OandM/Porur/F.APTS/D.No.105/15-16, dated 02.06.2015 passed by the 1st respondent, under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and to quash the same and consequently, to direct the respondents to … e-mail, within the period of 7 working days, as prescribed under Rules 11 and 12, Regulation 23 AA of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, … made a detailed argument by inviting the attention of this Court to Rule 22(a) of Regulation 23AA of Chapter IV of the Supply Code, which defines "accused person". Further, it is the submission of the petitioner that

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

determine policy and issue directions etc.); other enactments such as Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India, 2008; The Electricity Act, 2003 (Section 79 and various sub-sections enabling determination of policy, the Tariff, Regulations of Tariffs, facilitation of inter-State transmission … but not under Section 3 of the Act. Hearing on penalty is extended to all other cases under Chapter VI of the Act including for non-cooperation and gun-jumping, but not for penalties in respect of contraventions under … DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 12.2018 Pronounced on:10. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 11467/2018, CM APPL. 44376-44378/2018 MAHINDRA ELECTRIC MOBILITY LIMITED AND ANR. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF

Paliwal Alloys (Pvt.) Limited Vs. U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3746

an appeal and to deposit an amount of Rs. 10,00,000 along with the appeal as provided under the Electricity Act, 2003 within a period of three weeks and the appellate authority was directed to decide the appeal within a … is in fact second writ petition, which deserves to be dismissed as in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XXII, Rule 7 of the Rules of the Court second application on the same facts is barred. Before

Hotel Adityaz Limited Vs. Madhya Pradesh Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

impermissible. It is further submitted that the action of the respondents runs contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for brevity, the 'Act') and clause 9.1.1 of the Code. Shri Katare submits that along with the return, … be made at twice rate, while the units will be arrived at 1.5 times. Reliance is placed on Chapter 10 of the Code and Sections 155 and 154 of the Act. The allegations of malafide are specifically … contentions relied on the judgments of Supreme Court, reported in, 1988 JLJ 110 (M.P. Electricity Board and others v. Smt. Basanti Bai). He also relied