Advanced Search Results

Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Vs. Delhi Transco Limited Through Its

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

A.P. Gas Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commis ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2, 2(8), 2(10), 2(22), 2(28), 2(29), 2(30), 2(32), 2(36), 2(49), 2(50), 2(67), 2(75), 9, 9(1), 9(2), 14, 39, 39(1), 39(2), 39(4), 40, 42, 42(2), 49, 62(1), 76 to 109, 158, 176, 181, 391 and 391(2); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998; Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Andhra Pradesh Act, 2003; Electricity Rules, 2005 - Rule 3

Reported in : AIR2006AP12; 2005(6)ALD368

O.P.(SR) No. 19 of 2004 was filed by A.P. Transmission Corporation Limited (A.P.TRANSCO) under Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (the Act, for brevity) seeking orders from APERC to direct APGPCL to allocate surrendered energy to A.P.TRANSCO from … study into various aspects submitted its report in April, 1995. The conclusions of the study are found in Chapter X of the report. While recommending restructuring of A.P. State Electricity Board, it was suggested to unbundle the … as follows. APGPCL has two Gas Power Plants at Vijjeswaram of capacity 100 MW and 170 MW. The power generated by APGPCL is shared by

In the Matter Of: Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board, Shimla Vs. ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

not to share the capital cost of the said hydro projects. 6. After coming into force of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Uttarakhand Jal Vidyut Nigam Limited (Respondent-2) was regulated by the Uttrakhand Electricity Regulatory Commission under the Electricity … the Commissions to determine the tariff for generation and supply. The jurisdiction of the Commissions is covered in Chapter-X of the Act on Regulatory Commissions indicating Constitution, powers and functions of the Commissions. Under Section 79(1)(a) the … 14.03.2007. 9. Thereupon the Respondent-2, UJVNL, filed a petition in Petition No. 103/05 before the Central Commission for determination of the tariff for the supply

Hotel Adityaz Limited Vs. Madhya Pradesh Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

impermissible. It is further submitted that the action of the respondents runs contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for brevity, the 'Act') and clause 9.1.1 of the Code. Shri Katare submits that along with the return, … be made at twice rate, while the units will be arrived at 1.5 times. Reliance is placed on Chapter 10 of the Code and Sections 155 and 154 of the Act. The allegations of malafide are specifically denied.

The Assistant Executive Engineer (Electricl), Karnataka Electricity Bo ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 126, 127 and 145; Karnataka Electricity Board Electricity Supply Rules - Rules 2.33 and 46.01; Karnataka Electricity Board Electricity Supply Regulations, 1988

Reported in : 2009(2)KarLJ504:2009(1)KCCR436; 2009(2)AIRKarR95; 2009(2)KLJ504:2009(1)KCCR436;

maintainable, as rightly held by the trial court. The learned Counsel referred to the relevant Sections of the Electricity Act, 2003 as well as to the Karnataka Electricity Board Electricity Supply Regulations, 1988 ('Regulations, 1988 in short') to submit … of the Board and such other officers Authorized by the Board from time to time. Rule 46.01 in Chapter X of the Regulations, 1988 provides for an appeal being preferred to the appellate authority and the said … Authorized by the Board from time to time. Rule 46.01 in Chapter X of the Regulations, 1988 provides for an appeal being preferred to the

M/S Sarjan Realities Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Maharashtra Electricity ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

on the date of enactment of the Electricity Act, 2003 and held as under in para 1 of Chapter 7(B) on “Determination of wheeling charges and surcharge”. “ The Commission rules that open access transactions on the … contracts, the Commission opined that all open access contracts in existence on the date of enactment of the Electricity Act, 2003 should be honoured to ensure sanctity of the contract. The Commission ruled that all open access transactions on … for wheeling but provided the procedure for levy and collection of charges. 10. In April, 2006, MSEDCL (R-2) signed Energy Wheeling Agreement with Wind Energy

B.T.Kokila Vs. the Chairman, Tamilnadu Electricity and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code - Regulation 23(AA); Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 135; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21

the cases on hand, barring one or two, are cases in which proceedings under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, have been initiated. 3. In some cases, the petitioners have come up with writ petitions, immediately after provisional … attempted abstraction or attempted consumption or attempted use- (i) does not exceed 10 kilowatt, the fine imposed on first conviction shall not be less than … appellate and revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 156, in a manner similar to those prescribed by Chapters 29 and 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 21. An interesting facet of Sections 154 to 156

Andhra Pradesh Ferro Alloys Vs. Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Education

of Andhra Pradesh had decided to provide subsidy of Rs.5500 Cr in accordance with Section 65 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for the tariff proposal of the Distribution Companies for the FY 2013-14. 24. Accordingly, the State Commission after … 18.3.2013, the State Govt vide letter dated 23.3.2013 issued directions under Section 108 of the Electricity Act, 2003 to make uniform supply tariff for all … the Distribution Licensees and has re-determined the retail supply tariffs for FY 2013-14 as indicated in the following chapters?. 31. Let us now examine issue wise as to whether the State Commission has blindly adopted the directions/suggestions

Tata Power Company Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commiss ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3, 5, 12, 22(1), 22B and 22B(1); Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(17), 2(4), 2(70), 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 10(3), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 12, 12(2), 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 33, 55(2), 55(3), 42, 42(2), 60, 62(1), 62(2), 62(95), 73, 76(1), 81(1), 81(2), 82, 83, 86, 86(1), 125, 128(1), 128(6), 128(7), 128(8), 129 and 181; Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1959; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 22(1) and 22; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 43, 43A, 44, 46 and 49; Reforms Act; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Income and Corporation Taxes Act, 1970 - Sections 488; Companies Act - Sections 255 and 256; Constitution of India - Article 19(1); MERC (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulati

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR2966; 2009LC(SC)246; 2009(5)LC2440(SC)

view of the prevailing supply shortage situation, the Commission has invoked its powers under Section 23 of the Electricity Act 2003, and has directed the distribution licensees to share the available generation capacity in a particular ratio, based on … object it seeks to achieve wherefor the Commission and the Tribunal were not only required to consider the chapter headings but also the marginal notes.v) Principles of harmonious construction of the provisions of the statutes having not … in future. It also took into account the basis for arriving at 10 paise/kwh surcharge payable by TPC (G) to BEST in case the availability

Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd. Vs. Essar Power Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationElectricity

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(3), 11, 11(5) and 11(6); Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganization and Regulation) Act, 2003; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 79, 79(1), 86(1), 94(2), 158, 173, 174 and 175; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Mimansa Rules; State Grid Code; Constitution of India - Article 14; Arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance, 1996

Reported in : AIR2008SC1921; 2008(2)ARBLR1(SC); 2008(2)AWC1238(SC); (2008)2CompLJ357(SC); 2008(4)CTC539; 2008LC(SC)1; (2008)3GLR2246(SC); JT2008(3)SC336; (2008)4MLJ573(SC); (2008)4SCC75; 2008AIRSCW2169

Ahmedabad (hereinafter in short 'the Commission') by Application No. 873 of 2005 made under Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter in short 'the Act of 2003').8. Since the Nigam did not send its approval for appointment of … 1996. However, since the Electricity Act, 2003 has come into force w.e.f. 10.6.2003, after this date all adjudication of disputes between licensees and generating companies … of dealing with conflicts which have been fully discussed by Shabar Swami in his commentary on Sutra 14, Chapter III, Book III of Jaimini.(1) Where two texts which are apparently conflicting are capable of being reconciled, then