Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: electricity act 1910 section 36 · Page 1 of about 419 results (0.068 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 24 1971

The Rajasthan State Electricity Board, Jaipur Vs. the State of Rajasth ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-24-1971

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 24(1), 24(2), 36(2), 37, 37(1) and 37(2); Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 6(3)

Reported in : AIR1972Raj143; 1971(4)WLN656

upholding the award dated 14th August, 1967, given by the Electrical Inspector under Section 24(2) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, in a dispute raised by respondent No. 3 Shri Govind Singh Mehta, proprietor of the Chitra Cinema at … for power consumption (service No. 5661).3. Having felt aggrieved by this award, the Board filed an appeal under Section 36(2) of the 1910 Act before the Government on 19th of January, 1968. The Government by its order dated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 1991

Rampalsingh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-05-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 36, 39 and 50; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 26 and 55; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379

Reported in : 1992CriLJ3745

right because the prosecution concerns theft of electricity and yet the special provision of Section 39 of Indian Electricity Act, 1910, for short, the 'Act', has apparently been over-i looked in passing the impugned order. It is conceded very … has to possess 'special qualification' and has to be 'concerned with the offence.'7. It is noteworthy that although Section 36 of the Act contemplates appointment by the appropriate Government of 'duly qualified persons' as Electrical Inspectors, they can

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2005

Jai Glass and Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the West Bengal State Electricit ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-27-2005

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 20, 30, 33 and 41; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 19(4), 24, 24(2), 26(6), 36(2), 44(3), 45(3), 52 and 57; ;Electricity Supply Act, 1946 - Section 76; ;Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Section 76; ;Electricity Rules

Reported in : (2005)3CALLT343(HC)

the said Act. The petitioner had also invoked the provisions of Section 24(2) and 26(6) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 read with section 76 of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948.3. According to the petitioner all the bills that … sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 instead of preferring an appeal in terms of Section 36(2) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.7. Before dealing with the respective contentions of the parties it is necessary

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 20 1998

U.P.S.E.B. Vs. Atma Steels and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-20-1998

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 -- Sections 26(7) and 36(2)

Reported in : AIR1998SC846; JT1998(1)SC313; RLW1998(1)SC135; 1998(1)SCALE260; (1998)2SCC597; [1998]1SCR228; 1998(1)LC333(SC)

before the Chief Electrical Inspector on 20th February 1993 purporting to be under Section 26 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 requiring the Inspector to exercise his jurisdiction under the said provision and to quash the aforesaid assessment which … the correct amount payable by the respondent.6. The appellant then filed an appeal before the State Government under Section 36(2) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910. This appeal was allowed with the appellate authority coming to the conclusion

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2008

Sesa Goa Limited and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-11-2008

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(36), 5, 63, 64, 65, 67, 68, 69, 73, 73(1) and 73(1A); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 403, 405, 406, 409, 415 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 155(2), 156(1), 319, 468, 472, 473 and 482; Contract Act; Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 22; Uttar Pradesh Electricity (Duty) Act; Electricity Act, 1910; Constitution of India - Article 226; Defence of India Rules

Reported in : 2008(111)BomLR261; [2009]151CompCas358(Bom); [2009]89SCL169(Bom)

great emphasis, the Supreme Court was dealing with a matter under the U.P. Electricity (Duty) Act and the Electricity Act 1910 as well as the Companies Act. It was observed by the Supreme Court that after taking into consideration … the Board of SIL. The allegations made in the complaint were that the Companies had committed offences under Section 73 of the Companies Act, 1956 as well as Under Section 403 and 406 r/w Section 34 of … In the case of DDA v. Skipper Foods (1997) 89 C C 362, the corporate veil was lifted in order to reach the assets of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2002

Lapsi Filaments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-08-2002

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 26(6), 36 and 37; Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 4

Reported in : (2002)3GLR879

petition, the order dated 22nd May, 2001 passed by the Electrical Inspector, Surat, under Section 26(6) of the Electricity Act, 1910 is challenged on the various grounds stated in the petition as well as those which were urged during … urged during the course of hearing. Against the aforesaid order the petitioner preferred an appeal, as provided under Section 36 of the Act which came to be rejected on 6th October, 2001. 3. Mr. Girish Patel, learned Senior

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2005

Suresh Jindal Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-14-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 - Sections 14; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3 to 11, 12 to 18, 26, 28, 36(2), 37, 40, 49A, 50, 51, 53, 60 and 67 to 69; Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1956; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5 to 18, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 69(1), 72, 73 and 75 to 83; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 20, 26, 26(6), 55, 53, 70, 76, 79 and 185(3); Electricity Act, 1887; Electricity Act, 1903; Electricity Laws (Amendment) Act, 1998; Electricity Regulation Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 13, 22, 28 and 29; Electricity Reforms Act; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 - Sections 3 to 11, 12, 14, 15, 19 to 27, 63 and 63(3); Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1947; Bureau of Indian Sta

Reported in : 126(2006)DLT49

respective area of distribution and whether they are vested with the powers of a licensee under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, the Indian Electricity Rules, 1956 and the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948.(d) Whether till regulations are framed under Section … to general policy matters, to the Government.(ii) In respect of matters provided in Sections 3 to 11, 28, 36(2), 49-A, 50 and 51 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 (Central Act of 1910) to the extent this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1999

Punjab State Electricity Board Vs. Radha Steel Polling Mills and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-08-1999

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 36 and 36(2); Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 6; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : AIR2000P& H94; (1999)123PLR603

of law that arises for adjudication in this petition is whether the Appellate Authority constituted under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 (hereinafter referred to as the 1910 Act') can condone delay in the filing of appeal under the Indian … surcharge and demand surcharge by holding that the same were not leviable. The petitioner filed an appeal under Section 36(2) of the 1910 Act for setting aside the award made by the Chief Electrical Inspector. It also applied

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1964

The Amalgamated Electricity Co. Ltd. Vs. N.S. Bhathena and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-30-1964

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Supply Act,1948 - Sections 57, 57-A and 70; Bombay Electricity (Surcharge) Act, 1946; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1964SC1598; [1963]33CompCas568(SC); [1964]7SCR503

controversy in the appeal. The Appellant was, as stated earlier, the transferee of a licence granted under the Electricity Act, 1910. Section 3 of this Act enables the State Government, on application made to it, to grant to any person … any charge beyond 31 nP. per unit and an injunction restraining the Appellant from charging this illegal excess. 36. The defence of the Appellant was based on the provisions contained in the Supply Act of 1948, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2001

Klayman Porcelains Limited Vs. Superintending Engineer, Operation, Mah ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-31-2001

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3 to 11, 20, 20(1), 21(2), 21(3), 22, 23, 23(3), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 26(3), 26(4), 26(6), 26(7), 27, 33(2), 36(2), 37(2), 49, 50, 55 and 57; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rules 4 to 10, 27, 57 and 72; Companies Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 141; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 46, 49,70 and 78;

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD732; 2001(5)ALT274

1. Two questions as regard interpretation of the provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 26 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 (for short the '1910 Act') vis-a-vis condition Nos.22.1.2 and 22.2.3. in the light of the judgment of the … proceedings. Only in such a way the consumer is protected from the vagaries and arbitrariness of a licensee. 36. Yet, recently in Shamim Ashraf v. The Bihar State Electricity Board and others, 2001 (1) BLJ 109, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial