Advanced Search Results

Kenchappa High School Vs. the Deputy Director of Public Instructions a ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Education Act, 1983 - Sections 39, 39(1), 39(2) and 130

Reported in : 2009(3)KarLJ134

the 1st respondent dated 3-7-2008 withdrawing the recognition granted to it as per the provisions of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (for short, 'the Act').2. Babasaheb Ambedkar Vidyavardhak Sangh (R) has been running the petitioner school at Koul Bazaar, … of the aforesaid incident, the 1st respondent withdrew the recognition granted to the petitioner exercising the power under Section 39 of the Act.3. Sri B.D. Hiremath, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that the order of

S.C. Basavarajappa and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Karnataka Education Act, 1983 - Sections 87; Constitution of India - Article 39; Karnataka Education Rules

Reported in : ILR2005KAR3879; 2005(2)KarLJ456

which are not admissible to the employees of the aided institutions. Proviso to Section 87 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, declares that 'minimum qualification for recruitment, age of recruitment and retirement and benefits of retirement for employees in … of the private educational institutions are entitled to equal pay on par with the Government employees under Article 39(d) of the Constitution to give effect to the principle of 'equal pay for equal work'. The Counsel for

M/S.G.K.Naidu Trust vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

21.05.2025/28.05.2025/30.05.2025. The fourth respondent by these similar orders, in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 [for short, 'the Education Act'], has cancelled the registration of the petitioner's 13 institutions alleging that the petitioner … referring to cancellation of registration under Section 34 of the Education Act and also withdrawal of recognition under Section 39 thereof, the fourth respondent has cancelled recognition acting in exercise of the jurisdiction under Section 34 of the

Sumithra P. D/O Krishnappa Acharya and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka Rep ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Karnataka Civil Services (Service and Kannada Language Examinations) Rules, 1974 - Rules 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(5), 5 and 6; Karnataka Education Act, 1983 - Sections 87; Karnataka Government Servants (Probation) Rules, 1957 - Rule 10; Constution of India - Articles 14, 16, 39 and 226

Reported in : ILR2009(3)KAR2752

Counsel appearing for the petitioners would contend that having regard to proviso to Section 87 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, the teaching and non-teaching staff of the Government schools should be treated on par with the teaching and … others. They are entitled to equal pay so as to be on par with Government employees under Article 39(d) of the Constitution.16. In Chandigarh Administration and Ors. v. Rajni Vau (Mrs.) and Ors. : (2000) 2 SCC

Master Balachandar Krishnan Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

on a quarterly basis. Therefore, the respondent/Law School is “an aided institution” within the meaning of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 vide Section 2(18) and it cannot be considered as a self-financing institution. The respondent/Law School is a State … of this Court in Lolaksha vs. The Convener, Common Law Admission Test (CLAT-2009), NALSAR University of Law, [ILR2009Kar. 3934]. (Lolaksha). Further, -:18. :- pursuant to the Amendment Act, the hitherto existing intake of 80 seats has been

Mr Satyajit Sarna Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

on a quarterly basis. Therefore, the respondent/Law School is “an aided institution” within the meaning of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 vide Section 2(18) and it cannot be considered as a self-financing institution. The respondent/Law School is a State … of this Court in Lolaksha vs. The Convener, Common Law Admission Test (CLAT-2009), NALSAR University of Law, [ILR2009Kar. 3934]. (Lolaksha). Further, -:18. :- pursuant to the Amendment Act, the hitherto existing intake of 80 seats has been

Bar Council Of India Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

on a quarterly basis. Therefore, the respondent/Law School is “an aided institution” within the meaning of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 vide Section 2(18) and it cannot be considered as a self-financing institution. The respondent/Law School is a State … of this Court in Lolaksha vs. The Convener, Common Law Admission Test (CLAT-2009), NALSAR University of Law, [ILR2009Kar. 3934]. (Lolaksha). Further, -:18. :- pursuant to the Amendment Act, the hitherto existing intake of 80 seats has been

Sharanu Mahanthesh Rural Development Society vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

in purported exercise of his power under sub- Section (1) and (2) of Section 39 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, has cancelled the recognition which was accorded to the petitioner-Institution.2. Brief facts of the case are that; the

Chetana Education Trust (R) Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

Administration & Grant-in-Aid etc.) Rules, 2006 as unconstitutional and ultravires of the Constitution of India and the Karnataka Education Act, 1983: Annexure-G; b) Issue writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other Writ or Order or Direction in … R-1 TO R-10 SHRI R.GOPAL FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT ON I/A415)... RESPONDENTS --- THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION281282015 DATED:07. … the appellant who had contended that the same was contrary to Section 39(2) of the Act having regard to the facts involved in the case.

Sharanu Mahanthesh Rural Development Society vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

in purported exercise of his power under sub- Section (1) and (2) of Section 39 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, has cancelled the recognition which was accorded to the petitioner-Institution.2. Brief facts of the case are that; the