Advanced Search Results
Kenchappa High School Vs. the Deputy Director of Public Instructions a ...
Karnataka
Jul-21-2008
Constitution
Karnataka Education Act, 1983 - Sections 39, 39(1), 39(2) and 130
2009(3)KarLJ134
the 1st respondent dated 3-7-2008 withdrawing the recognition granted to it as per the provisions of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (for short, 'the Act').2. Babasaheb Ambedkar Vidyavardhak Sangh (R) has been running the petitioner school at Koul Bazaar, … of the aforesaid incident, the 1st respondent withdrew the recognition granted to the petitioner exercising the power under Section 39 of the Act.3. Sri B.D. Hiremath, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that the order of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.C. Basavarajappa and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Karnataka
Feb-08-2005
ConstitutionService
Karnataka Education Act, 1983 - Sections 87; Constitution of India - Article 39; Karnataka Education Rules
ILR2005KAR3879; 2005(2)KarLJ456
which are not admissible to the employees of the aided institutions. Proviso to Section 87 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, declares that 'minimum qualification for recruitment, age of recruitment and retirement and benefits of retirement for employees in … of the private educational institutions are entitled to equal pay on par with the Government employees under Article 39(d) of the Constitution to give effect to the principle of 'equal pay for equal work'. The Counsel for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSumithra P. D/O Krishnappa Acharya and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka Rep ...
Karnataka
Jun-30-2009
ServiceConstitution
Karnataka Civil Services (Service and Kannada Language Examinations) Rules, 1974 - Rules 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(5), 5 and 6; Karnataka Education Act, 1983 - Sections 87; Karnataka Government Servants (Probation) Rules, 1957 - Rule 10; Constution of India - Articles 14, 16, 39 and 226
ILR2009(3)KAR2752
Counsel appearing for the petitioners would contend that having regard to proviso to Section 87 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, the teaching and non-teaching staff of the Government schools should be treated on par with the teaching and … others. They are entitled to equal pay so as to be on par with Government employees under Article 39(d) of the Constitution.16. In Chandigarh Administration and Ors. v. Rajni Vau (Mrs.) and Ors. : (2000) 2 SCC
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bar Council Of India Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Sep-29-2020
Education
on a quarterly basis. Therefore, the respondent/Law School is “an aided institution” within the meaning of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 vide Section 2(18) and it cannot be considered as a self-financing institution. The respondent/Law School is a State … of this Court in Lolaksha vs. The Convener, Common Law Admission Test (CLAT-2009), NALSAR University of Law, [ILR2009Kar. 3934]. (Lolaksha). Further, -:18. :- pursuant to the Amendment Act, the hitherto existing intake of 80 seats has been
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChetana Education Trust (R) Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Nov-28-2019
Education
Administration & Grant-in-Aid etc.) Rules, 2006 as unconstitutional and ultravires of the Constitution of India and the Karnataka Education Act, 1983: Annexure-G; b) Issue writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other Writ or Order or Direction in … R-1 TO R-10 SHRI R.GOPAL FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT ON I/A415)... RESPONDENTS --- THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION281282015 DATED:07. … the appellant who had contended that the same was contrary to Section 39(2) of the Act having regard to the facts involved in the case.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaster Balachandar Krishnan Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Sep-29-2020
Education
on a quarterly basis. Therefore, the respondent/Law School is “an aided institution” within the meaning of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 vide Section 2(18) and it cannot be considered as a self-financing institution. The respondent/Law School is a State … of this Court in Lolaksha vs. The Convener, Common Law Admission Test (CLAT-2009), NALSAR University of Law, [ILR2009Kar. 3934]. (Lolaksha). Further, -:18. :- pursuant to the Amendment Act, the hitherto existing intake of 80 seats has been
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr Satyajit Sarna Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Sep-29-2020
Education
on a quarterly basis. Therefore, the respondent/Law School is “an aided institution” within the meaning of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 vide Section 2(18) and it cannot be considered as a self-financing institution. The respondent/Law School is a State … of this Court in Lolaksha vs. The Convener, Common Law Admission Test (CLAT-2009), NALSAR University of Law, [ILR2009Kar. 3934]. (Lolaksha). Further, -:18. :- pursuant to the Amendment Act, the hitherto existing intake of 80 seats has been
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re Section 6a Of The Citizenship Act 1955
Supreme Court of India
Oct-17-2024
Right to Information
Parliamentary Debates: Official Report (Volume 1, 1950), 336 84 “IMDT Act” 85 The Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act 1983; Section 1(3): “It shall be deemed to have come into force in the State of Assam on the 15th … State of Bihar [5J]. (1969) 2 SCR73[8,9]. Page 69 of 94 PART C Article 30 to establish minority educational institutions must be limited to the purpose of conserving language, script or culture.156 This Court held that a … completion of six months but before the commencement of the Constitution.21. Article 394 provides when different provisions of the Constitution commence. The provision states that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKerala University, B. Com. Students Vs. University of Kerala and ors.
Kerala
Dec-21-1983
Constitution
Kerala University Act, 1974 - Sections 38, 39, 39(1) and 41
AIR1984Ker217
it was only on7-9-1983 that the Registrar of the University wrote to the Secretary to the Higher Collegiate Education, and the Government's sanction for the introduction was obtained only on 24-10-1983, and it was thereafter that the … Ordinances are to be, or may be prescribed by Regulations.' Procedure for making Regulations is as contained in Section 39 of the Act and that provides as follows:--''Procedure for making Regulations.-- (1) All Regulations made under this Act
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArvindkumar Chandulal Pathak Vs. Mahajan Kelavani Mandal and anr.
Gujarat
Jan-23-1998
Civil
(1998)3GLR2224
reinstatement and recovery of the dues of his salary. Thereafter, with the coming into force of Gujarat Secondary Education Act, 1972 with effect from 13-12-1973 the suit was transferred to the Tribunal constituted under the said Act and … with the decision of the matter by the Division Bench of This Court and by Supreme Court in 1983 and none of the grounds urged by Mr. Jhaveri for review can be said to be the ground … of loss of confidence is in conflict with the statutory provisions of Sections 36 and 37 of Gujarat Secondary Education Act, 1972. That in view … Secondary Education Act, 1972. That in view of the provision of Section 39(9) the relief of reinstatement should have been granted.(3) That even if the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »