Advanced Search Results
Gujarat Vidhyapith Vs. Becharbhai Nagajibhai Bharwad
Gujarat
Oct-14-2004
Service
Grants Commission Act - Sections 3; Gujarat Universities Services Tribunal Act, 1983 - Sections 14, 14(1), 14(2), 14(3) and 15; Gujarat Secondary Education Act, 1972 - Sections 36 and 36(1); Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947 - Sections 40B, 40B(1), 40B(5), 40C and 40F; Gift Tax Act; Estate Duty Act; Constitution of India - Article 311 and 311(2)
(2005)1GLR407
accordingly with no order as to costs. Service - termination - Section 14 of Gujarat Universities Services Tribunal Act, 1983, Section 36 of Gujarat Secondary Education Act, 1972 and Section 40B of Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947 - whether termination
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMurugendra Shikshana Samstha Vs. Commr. for Public Instructions and or ...
Karnataka
Mar-11-1996
Constitution
Karnataka Education Act, 1983 - Sections 36(7)
ILR1997KAR436
vacated. The Learned Government Advocate is permitted to file his memo for appearance within three weeks. (A) KARNATAKA EDUCATION ACT, 1983 - Section 36(7) - one aided & another unaided institution's Societies merging into one & seeking recognition -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaster Balachandar Krishnan Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Sep-29-2020
Education
on a quarterly basis. Therefore, the respondent/Law School is “an aided institution” within the meaning of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 vide Section 2(18) and it cannot be considered as a self-financing institution. The respondent/Law School is a State
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bar Council Of India Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Sep-29-2020
Education
on a quarterly basis. Therefore, the respondent/Law School is “an aided institution” within the meaning of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 vide Section 2(18) and it cannot be considered as a self-financing institution. The respondent/Law School is a State
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr Satyajit Sarna Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Sep-29-2020
Education
on a quarterly basis. Therefore, the respondent/Law School is “an aided institution” within the meaning of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 vide Section 2(18) and it cannot be considered as a self-financing institution. The respondent/Law School is a State
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChetana Education Trust (R) Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Nov-28-2019
Education
Administration & Grant-in-Aid etc.) Rules, 2006 as unconstitutional and ultravires of the Constitution of India and the Karnataka Education Act, 1983: Annexure-G; b) Issue writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other Writ or Order or Direction in … education, etc. Chapter 6 of the said Act, which consists of Sections 36 to 39, inter alia deals with the recognition of educational institutions, etc.18. … R-1 TO R-10 SHRI R.GOPAL FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT ON I/A415)... RESPONDENTS --- THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION281282015 DATED:07.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOrganisation For Unaided Recognised Schools (r) (our Schools) Vs. Stat ...
Karnataka
Dec-02-2024
Education
counsel appearing for the petitioners is that, 4.1. The circular/order dated 06.06.2022 at Annexure-A has been issued under Section 36 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983. The said provision does not mandate the requirement of a plan sanction, … KARNATAKA BEARING THE NOTIFICATION No.C72) PRA SHI A.MANYATHI SHARATHU2312018-19 DATED0606.2022 (ANNX-C AT PAGE No.47-48) IS ULTRA-VIRES THE KARNATAKA EDUCATION ACT, 1983 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Chandramati D. Thakore Vs. Jayantilal Dahyalal Jani and anr.
Gujarat
Mar-16-1994
ServiceCivil
(1995)1GLR638
just and proper and that there was no breach of provisions of Section 36 of the Gujarat Secondary Education Act, 1972 ('the Act' for short). In that view of the conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed both the applications.4. Feeling … meantime, while the said application was pending, one more class was required to be reduced in the year 1983-84 and, therefore, again the management approached the District Education Officer for his permission to remove one more teacher.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArjun Ganpatrao Mahajan Vs. the Punjabrao Krishi Vidyapeeth and anr.
Mumbai
Jul-13-1994
Constitution
Maharashtra Agricultural Universities (Krishi Vidyapeeths) Act, 1983 - Sections 38(6), 47, 48 and 49; Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 - Rule 10(1); Punjabrao Agricultural Universities (Krishi Vidyapeeths) Services Rules, 1971 - Rule 10.1; Nagpur University Act, 1974 - Sections 57; ;Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 - Rule 10(1); ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226; Maharashtra Agricultural Universities (Krishi Vidyapeeths) Act, 1967 - Sections 3 and 53; Bombay Civil Services Rules, 1959 - Rule 161
1996(2)BomCR120
by the State Government with a view to provide better facilities for education in agriculture and allied matters, and in particular for the development of … all the Agricultural Universities in the State of Maharashtra, and therefore, passed the Maharashtra Agricultural Universities (Krishi Vidyapeeths) Act, 1983 (for short the M.A.U. Act, 1983) to consolidate and amend the law relating to the four Agricultural Universities … as provided in Rule 10.1 of Chapter X of the Service Rules, 1971 i.e. Statute 91 framed under section 36 of the P.K.V. Act which Rules were then applicable to the P.K.V. employees including its academic staff. The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShambhusinh P. Chavda Vs. Chairman
Gujarat
Oct-25-1999
Service
(2000)3GLR211
of the special civil application. He further submits that the provisions of Section 36 of the Gujarat Secondary Education Act and the provisions of Regulation 27 of the Gujarat Secondary Education Regulation, 1974, are very clear and before … the order dated 29th August 1982 of the Gujarat Secondary Education Tribunal at Ahmedabad in Application No.183 of 1983.2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the petitioner was convicted for offence punishable under Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »