Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: education act 1983 section 36 · Page 1 of about 1,469 results (0.134 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 14 2004

Gujarat Vidhyapith Vs. Becharbhai Nagajibhai Bharwad

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-14-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Grants Commission Act - Sections 3; Gujarat Universities Services Tribunal Act, 1983 - Sections 14, 14(1), 14(2), 14(3) and 15; Gujarat Secondary Education Act, 1972 - Sections 36 and 36(1); Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947 - Sections 40B, 40B(1), 40B(5), 40C and 40F; Gift Tax Act; Estate Duty Act; Constitution of India - Article 311 and 311(2)

Reported in : (2005)1GLR407

accordingly with no order as to costs. Service - termination - Section 14 of Gujarat Universities Services Tribunal Act, 1983, Section 36 of Gujarat Secondary Education Act, 1972 and Section 40B of Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947 - whether termination

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1996

Murugendra Shikshana Samstha Vs. Commr. for Public Instructions and or ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-11-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Education Act, 1983 - Sections 36(7)

Reported in : ILR1997KAR436

vacated. The Learned Government Advocate is permitted to file his memo for appearance within three weeks. (A) KARNATAKA EDUCATION ACT, 1983 - Section 36(7) - one aided & another unaided institution's Societies merging into one & seeking recognition -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2020

Bar Council Of India Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-29-2020

Subject : Education

on a quarterly basis. Therefore, the respondent/Law School is “an aided institution” within the meaning of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 vide Section 2(18) and it cannot be considered as a self-financing institution. The respondent/Law School is a State

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 29 2020

Master Balachandar Krishnan Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-29-2020

Subject : Education

on a quarterly basis. Therefore, the respondent/Law School is “an aided institution” within the meaning of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 vide Section 2(18) and it cannot be considered as a self-financing institution. The respondent/Law School is a State

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2020

Mr Satyajit Sarna Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-29-2020

Subject : Education

on a quarterly basis. Therefore, the respondent/Law School is “an aided institution” within the meaning of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 vide Section 2(18) and it cannot be considered as a self-financing institution. The respondent/Law School is a State

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2019

Chetana Education Trust (R) Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-28-2019

Subject : Education

Administration & Grant-in-Aid etc.) Rules, 2006 as unconstitutional and ultravires of the Constitution of India and the Karnataka Education Act, 1983: Annexure-G; b) Issue writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other Writ or Order or Direction in … education, etc. Chapter 6 of the said Act, which consists of Sections 36 to 39, inter alia deals with the recognition of educational institutions, etc.18. … R-1 TO R-10 SHRI R.GOPAL FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT ON I/A415)... RESPONDENTS --- THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION281282015 DATED:07.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2024

Organisation For Unaided Recognised Schools (r) (our Schools) Vs. Stat ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-02-2024

Subject : Education

counsel appearing for the petitioners is that, 4.1. The circular/order dated 06.06.2022 at Annexure-A has been issued under Section 36 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983. The said provision does not mandate the requirement of a plan sanction, … KARNATAKA BEARING THE NOTIFICATION No.C72) PRA SHI A.MANYATHI SHARATHU2312018-19 DATED0606.2022 (ANNX-C AT PAGE No.47-48) IS ULTRA-VIRES THE KARNATAKA EDUCATION ACT, 1983 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2026

Sri Narayan Achari vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-04-2026

THE RESPONDENT NO.5 IN NO. C.A/RA/NEW/AXFERD/STALANTARA/CR/19/2025-26 AS PERANNEXURE-A, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC 36 AND 39 OF THE KARNATAKA EDUCATION ACT, 1983, AND RULES FRAMED THEREUNDER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:CORAM: HON'BLE … OF THE MEMORANDUM DATED 13.08.2025 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.5 IN NO. C.A/RA/NEW/AXFERD/STALANTARA/CR/19/2025-26 AS PERANNEXURE-A, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC 36 AND 39 OF THE KARNATAKA EDUCATION ACT, 1983, AND RULES FRAMED THEREUNDER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 01 2026

Psbb Learning Leadership Academy vs Mrs.Barnali Rout

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-01-2026

four years after the termination of services. 12.4. It is knowing fully well that an appeal under theKarnataka Education Act, 1983 was not maintainable, and only barred that, the teacher has approached the Commissioner of Disabilities. Even if the … governmental support. He submits that the Government has not even notified a Special Employment Exchange as required under Section 36. The Respondent without applying - 19 -under Section 38 of the Act is trying to harass the petitioner.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 1994

Smt. Chandramati D. Thakore Vs. Jayantilal Dahyalal Jani and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-16-1994

Subject : ServiceCivil

Reported in : (1995)1GLR638

just and proper and that there was no breach of provisions of Section 36 of the Gujarat Secondary Education Act, 1972 ('the Act' for short). In that view of the conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed both the applications.4. Feeling … meantime, while the said application was pending, one more class was required to be reduced in the year 1983-84 and, therefore, again the management approached the District Education Officer for his permission to remove one more teacher.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial