Advanced Search Results

JaIn Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs and Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1987)(11)LC545Tri(Mum.)bai

into the realm of an educated guess as resorted to by the 'A' Bench of the Tribunal. While education is a life long process and it is never too late to learn, the path offered by the … Merck Spares, Delhi v. Collector of Customs & Central Excise, New Delhi 1983 ELT 1261 : 1983 ECR 1473D. The Tribunal in this case had … stated that the Collector had found that this was normally a case of levy of a penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act but the Collector had refrained from levying the penalty in view of the sufficient

Aishat Shifa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

19832) Government Circular:509 SHH2013 Date:31- 01-2014 Preamble:- 13 As mentioned in the above at reference No.1, the Karnataka Education Act 1983 passed by the Government of Karnataka (1-1995) Section [7(2)(g)(v)].* stipulates that all the school students studying in Karnataka … such religious practices as are an essential and an integral part of it and no other.” (Emphasis Supplied) 112. In Sri Venkataramana Devaru & Ors. v. State of Mysore & Ors.49, the question examined was whether the

Dukku Labudu Bariki Vs. Sobha Hymavathi Devi and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ConstitutionElection

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 15(4), 16, 16(4), 226, 246 and 330; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 5 and 81; Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Tribes, Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes (Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates) Act, 1993 - Sections 3(1), 7 and 19

Reported in : 2003(4)ALD138

she appeared for Matriculation and B.A. examinations as a private candidate and completed B.Ed., from Women's College of Education at Rajahmundry, and was appointed as aided teacher in Visakhapatnam in a vacancy reserved for a tribal candidate, … 25 of 1999 admittedly was contesting and winning all the elections from 1983 to 1994 from Srungavarapukota Assembly Constituency, which is being reserved for Scheduled … what relief ?6. Since the three Election Petitions are in respect of the same election, as contemplated by Section 112 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (the Act) they were clubbed and evidence was recorded in E.P.

Commissioner of Customs, Kandla Vs. Essar Oil Limited and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1967 - Sections 15(1), 16(1), 17, 17(2), 28, 28(1), 28AB, 46, 47(2), 51(1), 55, 58, 59(2), 68, 72, 111, 112 and 155; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111, 112, 114A and 155; Central Treasury Rules - Rules 70, 79, 79(1) and 80; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Central Government Account (Receipt and Payment Rules, 1983) - Rule 20; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8

Reported in : 2004(96)ECC497; 2004(172)ELT433(SC); JT2004(9)SC12; 2004(8)SCALE570; (2004)11SCC364

Roshan Deen v. Preeti Lal : (2002)ILLJ465SC Ram Preeti Yadav v. U.P. Board of High School and Intermediate Education : AIR2003SC4268 , Ram Chandra Singh's case (supra) and Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. State of T.N. and Anr. … overlooking the effect of the Central Government Account (Receipt and Payment Rules, 1983) (in short 'Receipt Rules') which clearly stipulates as to the relevant date … judgment the CEGAT set aside the imposition of duty, redemption fine, interest and penalty levied under the Customs Act, 1967 (in short the 'Act') levied/imposed on respondent No. 1 M/s Essar Oil Limited (hereinafter referred to as … bond of Rs. 120 crores was executed by respondent No. 1 under Section 59(2) of the Act to secure payment of customs duty. Between 18 … EOL is leviable under Section 114A or Section 112(a)/(b) of the Customs Act, 1962;(vi) The extent of

Koganti Jayakrishna and anr. Vs. State of A.P. and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 15(1), 15(4), 16(4), 226 and 371D(1); Andhra Pradesh Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions into Under-graduate Professional Courses through Common Entrance Test) Rules, 1993 - Rules 6, 7, 7(6), 7(7), 7(8), 7(10) and 8

Reported in : 2002(4)ALD389; 2002(4)ALT9

Matched in: Advocate S. Sri Ram, Adv. in WP No. 1605 of 2001 and ;Nooty Rama Mohana Rao, Adv. in WP No. 16030 of 2001 Adv.-General and ;Government Pleader for Higher Education for the Respondent No. 1 in WP No. 16015 and for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in WP No. 16030 and ;C. Kodanda Ram, Adv. for Respondent No. 2 in WP

Aligarh Muslim University versus Naresh Agarwal & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.1647

any law for the time being in force; …” 96 See, for instance, Section 30 of the Karnataka Education Act 1983: “ 30. Educational institutions to be registered.- (1) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, every local authority … preamble of the AMU Act 1920 stated that it is an enactment to ‘establish’ and ‘incorporate’ a University. 112. We do not agree with this submission. It cannot be argued that a university was established by Parliament

Mahant Prasad Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Service Selection Board Rules, 1998 - Rule 11

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2261

Shiksha is directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law and the provisions of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921, against the management of the college for not complying with its statutory duty for getting a permanent … of Principal of the college be kept in abeyance till the decision in Writ Petition No. 12216 of 1983. The facts relating to the said writ petition are that in that year 1983 when the selection process … joins the institution. The said judgment was challenged in Special Appeal No. 112 of 2002. The Division Bench vide its order dated 30.1.2002 remanded the … of Prem Narain Singh in such forgery ; first information report under Section 420, I.P.C. filed against Prem Narain Singh ; as well as the

Master Balachandar Krishnan Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

on a quarterly basis. Therefore, the respondent/Law School is “an aided institution” within the meaning of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 vide Section 2(18) and it cannot be considered as a self-financing institution. The respondent/Law School is a State

Mr Satyajit Sarna Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

on a quarterly basis. Therefore, the respondent/Law School is “an aided institution” within the meaning of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 vide Section 2(18) and it cannot be considered as a self-financing institution. The respondent/Law School is a State

Bar Council Of India Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

on a quarterly basis. Therefore, the respondent/Law School is “an aided institution” within the meaning of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 vide Section 2(18) and it cannot be considered as a self-financing institution. The respondent/Law School is a State