Advanced Search Results

Dr. B.K. Naik and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Ministry of Lay and P ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Education

through legislation would be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. iii) When Section 87 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, along with Rules (1), (3), 2 (d), 3, 3 (1) (a) (b) (c), 3 (2) (a) and Rule … (d), 3, 3 (1) (a) (b) (c), 3 (2) (a) and Rule 17 (1) of Karnataka Education Rules, has been examined, interpreted and held by … fit into the category of a Government employee i.e., they do not satisfy the three conditions prescribed under Chapter XVI of Karnataka Civil Services Rules so as to claim equality with employees working in institutions run by

Dr (Ms) B K Naik Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

through legislation would be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. iii) When Section 87 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, along with Rules (1), (3), 2 (d), 3, 3 (1) (a) (b) (c), 3 (2) (a) and Rule … (d), 3, 3 (1) (a) (b) (c), 3 (2) (a) and Rule 17 (1) of Karnataka Education Rules, has been examined, interpreted and held by … fit into the category of a Government employee i.e., they do not satisfy the three conditions prescribed under Chapter XVI of Karnataka Civil Services Rules so as to claim equality with employees working in institutions run by

Mirza Nazir S/O Mirza Raheem Baig Vs. Education Officer, Z.P., Bhandar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Secondary School Code; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Condition of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rules 5 and Rule 12; M.P. Secondary Education Act, 1991; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; M.P. School Code - Rule 7; M.P. Secondary Education Act, 1951 - Sections 19 and 20; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 - Sections 16

Reported in : 1998(4)BomCR544

on record. The Secondary School Education in Old Madhya Pradesh since 1951 was governed by the M.P. Secondary Education Act and Regulations made under sections 19 and 20 of the M.P. Secondary Education Act, 1951, Chapter XII of … the petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 1569 of 1984. It is pertinent to note that in the year 1983, a fourth seniority list was published wherein the name of the petitioner was shown at Sr. No. 5 … at Sr. No. 5 and intervener's name was shown at Sr. No. 17. The intervener challenged the seniority list before the Regional Director, Municipal Administration,

Mirza Nazir Baig Vs. Education Officer and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1998(3)ALLMR80; (1998)ILLJ46Bom

record. The Secondary School Education in Old is Madhya Pradesh since 1951 was governed by the M.P. Secondary Education Act and Regulations made under Sections 19 and 20 of the M.P. Secondary Education Act, 1951 Chapter XII of … No. 2. Respondent No. 1 while considering the representations made by the intervener, passed order dated September 5, 1983 stating therein that the intervener was senior to the petitioner and the petitioner was promoted contrary to the … at Sr. No. 5 and intervener's name was shown at Sr. No. 17. The intervener challenged the seniority list before the Regional Director, Municipal Administration,

Miss Aishat Shifa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

dated 05.02.2022. This order purportedly issued under section 133 read with sections 7(2) & (5) of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (hereafter ‘1983 Act’) provides that, the students should compulsorily adhere to the dress code/uniform as follows: a. in … papers immediately at the hands of Hon’ble the Chief Justice for consideration...” 17 Accordingly, this Special Bench came to be constituted the very same day … AND2TO INITIATE ENQUIRY AGAINST THE RESPONDENT NO.5 COLLEGE AND RESPONDENT NO.6 i.e., PRINCIPLE FOR VIOLATING INSTRUCTION ENUMERATED UNDER CHAPTER6HEADING OF IMPORTANT INFORMATION OF GUIDELINES OF PU DEPARTMENT FOR ACADEMIC YEAR OF202122 SAME AT ANNEXURE-J FOR MAINTAINING UNIFORM

Ghanshyam Upadhyay Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

dated 05.02.2022. This order purportedly issued under section 133 read with sections 7(2) & (5) of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (hereafter ‘1983 Act’) provides that, the students should compulsorily adhere to the dress code/uniform as follows: a. in … papers immediately at the hands of Hon’ble the Chief Justice for consideration...” 17 Accordingly, this Special Bench came to be constituted the very same day … AND2TO INITIATE ENQUIRY AGAINST THE RESPONDENT NO.5 COLLEGE AND RESPONDENT NO.6 i.e., PRINCIPLE FOR VIOLATING INSTRUCTION ENUMERATED UNDER CHAPTER6HEADING OF IMPORTANT INFORMATION OF GUIDELINES OF PU DEPARTMENT FOR ACADEMIC YEAR OF202122 SAME AT ANNEXURE-J FOR MAINTAINING UNIFORM

Miss Shaheena Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

dated 05.02.2022. This order purportedly issued under section 133 read with sections 7(2) & (5) of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (hereafter ‘1983 Act’) provides that, the students should compulsorily adhere to the dress code/uniform as follows: a. in … papers immediately at the hands of Hon’ble the Chief Justice for consideration...” 17 Accordingly, this Special Bench came to be constituted the very same day … AND2TO INITIATE ENQUIRY AGAINST THE RESPONDENT NO.5 COLLEGE AND RESPONDENT NO.6 i.e., PRINCIPLE FOR VIOLATING INSTRUCTION ENUMERATED UNDER CHAPTER6HEADING OF IMPORTANT INFORMATION OF GUIDELINES OF PU DEPARTMENT FOR ACADEMIC YEAR OF202122 SAME AT ANNEXURE-J FOR MAINTAINING UNIFORM

Smt Resham Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

dated 05.02.2022. This order purportedly issued under section 133 read with sections 7(2) & (5) of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (hereafter ‘1983 Act’) provides that, the students should compulsorily adhere to the dress code/uniform as follows: a. in … papers immediately at the hands of Hon’ble the Chief Justice for consideration...” 17 Accordingly, this Special Bench came to be constituted the very same day … AND2TO INITIATE ENQUIRY AGAINST THE RESPONDENT NO.5 COLLEGE AND RESPONDENT NO.6 i.e., PRINCIPLE FOR VIOLATING INSTRUCTION ENUMERATED UNDER CHAPTER6HEADING OF IMPORTANT INFORMATION OF GUIDELINES OF PU DEPARTMENT FOR ACADEMIC YEAR OF202122 SAME AT ANNEXURE-J FOR MAINTAINING UNIFORM

Ayesha Hajeera Almas Vs. Chief Secretary

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

dated 05.02.2022. This order purportedly issued under section 133 read with sections 7(2) & (5) of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (hereafter ‘1983 Act’) provides that, the students should compulsorily adhere to the dress code/uniform as follows: a. in … papers immediately at the hands of Hon’ble the Chief Justice for consideration...” 17 Accordingly, this Special Bench came to be constituted the very same day … AND2TO INITIATE ENQUIRY AGAINST THE RESPONDENT NO.5 COLLEGE AND RESPONDENT NO.6 i.e., PRINCIPLE FOR VIOLATING INSTRUCTION ENUMERATED UNDER CHAPTER6HEADING OF IMPORTANT INFORMATION OF GUIDELINES OF PU DEPARTMENT FOR ACADEMIC YEAR OF202122 SAME AT ANNEXURE-J FOR MAINTAINING UNIFORM

Ms Asleena Haniya Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

dated 05.02.2022. This order purportedly issued under section 133 read with sections 7(2) & (5) of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (hereafter ‘1983 Act’) provides that, the students should compulsorily adhere to the dress code/uniform as follows: a. in … papers immediately at the hands of Hon’ble the Chief Justice for consideration...” 17 Accordingly, this Special Bench came to be constituted the very same day … AND2TO INITIATE ENQUIRY AGAINST THE RESPONDENT NO.5 COLLEGE AND RESPONDENT NO.6 i.e., PRINCIPLE FOR VIOLATING INSTRUCTION ENUMERATED UNDER CHAPTER6HEADING OF IMPORTANT INFORMATION OF GUIDELINES OF PU DEPARTMENT FOR ACADEMIC YEAR OF202122 SAME AT ANNEXURE-J FOR MAINTAINING UNIFORM