Advanced Search Results

Mirza Nazir Baig Vs. Education Officer and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1998(3)ALLMR80; (1998)ILLJ46Bom

record. The Secondary School Education in Old is Madhya Pradesh since 1951 was governed by the M.P. Secondary Education Act and Regulations made under Sections 19 and 20 of the M.P. Secondary Education Act, 1951 Chapter XII of … No. 2. Respondent No. 1 while considering the representations made by the intervener, passed order dated September 5, 1983 stating therein that the intervener was senior to the petitioner and the petitioner was promoted contrary to the … 2025 of 1991 solely depended on the decision in Writ Petition No. 1569 of 1984. Both the petitions being between the same parties, are required

Mirza Nazir S/O Mirza Raheem Baig Vs. Education Officer, Z.P., Bhandar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Secondary School Code; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Condition of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rules 5 and Rule 12; M.P. Secondary Education Act, 1991; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; M.P. School Code - Rule 7; M.P. Secondary Education Act, 1951 - Sections 19 and 20; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 - Sections 16

Reported in : 1998(4)BomCR544

on record. The Secondary School Education in Old Madhya Pradesh since 1951 was governed by the M.P. Secondary Education Act and Regulations made under sections 19 and 20 of the M.P. Secondary Education Act, 1951, Chapter XII of … the petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 1569 of 1984. It is pertinent to note that in the year 1983, a fourth seniority list was published wherein the name of the petitioner was shown at Sr. No. 5 … of 1991 is solely depended on the decision in Writ Petition No. 1569 of 1984. Both the petitions being between the same parties, are required

Ghanshyam Upadhyay Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

FREEDOMS AND EDUCATION IN EUROPE’ is edited by Myrian Hunter-Henin; Mark Hill, a contributor to the book, at Chapter 15 titles his paper ‘BRACELETS, RINGS AND VEILS: THE ACCOMMODATION OF RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS IN THE UNIFORM POLICIES OF ENGLISH … dated 05.02.2022. This order purportedly issued under section 133 read with sections 7(2) & (5) of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (hereafter ‘1983 Act’) provides that, the students should compulsorily adhere to the dress code/uniform as follows: a. in

Miss Shaheena Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

FREEDOMS AND EDUCATION IN EUROPE’ is edited by Myrian Hunter-Henin; Mark Hill, a contributor to the book, at Chapter 15 titles his paper ‘BRACELETS, RINGS AND VEILS: THE ACCOMMODATION OF RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS IN THE UNIFORM POLICIES OF ENGLISH … dated 05.02.2022. This order purportedly issued under section 133 read with sections 7(2) & (5) of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (hereafter ‘1983 Act’) provides that, the students should compulsorily adhere to the dress code/uniform as follows: a. in

Smt Resham Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

FREEDOMS AND EDUCATION IN EUROPE’ is edited by Myrian Hunter-Henin; Mark Hill, a contributor to the book, at Chapter 15 titles his paper ‘BRACELETS, RINGS AND VEILS: THE ACCOMMODATION OF RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS IN THE UNIFORM POLICIES OF ENGLISH … dated 05.02.2022. This order purportedly issued under section 133 read with sections 7(2) & (5) of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (hereafter ‘1983 Act’) provides that, the students should compulsorily adhere to the dress code/uniform as follows: a. in

Ayesha Hajeera Almas Vs. Chief Secretary

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

FREEDOMS AND EDUCATION IN EUROPE’ is edited by Myrian Hunter-Henin; Mark Hill, a contributor to the book, at Chapter 15 titles his paper ‘BRACELETS, RINGS AND VEILS: THE ACCOMMODATION OF RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS IN THE UNIFORM POLICIES OF ENGLISH … dated 05.02.2022. This order purportedly issued under section 133 read with sections 7(2) & (5) of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (hereafter ‘1983 Act’) provides that, the students should compulsorily adhere to the dress code/uniform as follows: a. in

Ms Asleena Haniya Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

FREEDOMS AND EDUCATION IN EUROPE’ is edited by Myrian Hunter-Henin; Mark Hill, a contributor to the book, at Chapter 15 titles his paper ‘BRACELETS, RINGS AND VEILS: THE ACCOMMODATION OF RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS IN THE UNIFORM POLICIES OF ENGLISH … dated 05.02.2022. This order purportedly issued under section 133 read with sections 7(2) & (5) of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (hereafter ‘1983 Act’) provides that, the students should compulsorily adhere to the dress code/uniform as follows: a. in

Miss Aishat Shifa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

FREEDOMS AND EDUCATION IN EUROPE’ is edited by Myrian Hunter-Henin; Mark Hill, a contributor to the book, at Chapter 15 titles his paper ‘BRACELETS, RINGS AND VEILS: THE ACCOMMODATION OF RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS IN THE UNIFORM POLICIES OF ENGLISH … dated 05.02.2022. This order purportedly issued under section 133 read with sections 7(2) & (5) of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (hereafter ‘1983 Act’) provides that, the students should compulsorily adhere to the dress code/uniform as follows: a. in

Asha Saxena Vs. S.K. Chaudhari and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Seniority Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act - Sections 16E(10)

Reported in : (1995)IIILLJ182All; (1990)1UPLBEC516

or Education for cancelling the promotion of all the three lecturers under Section 16-E(10) of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act. That matter is still pending before the Director of Education and no decision has been taken by him … paragraph which provides that seniority will have to be revised every year. Reliance has also been placed on 1983 UPLBEC 297. The decision is in favour of the petitioner but we have our doubts whether a rule … the seniority would be determined under Clause (b) of Rule 3 of Chapter III on age. In 1976 Clause (bb) was added and it provided … substance contrary to this principle is not sound and cannot be supported'. 15. For the reasons stated above, in our opinion, firstly the provisions of

Yogendra Pal Singh Vs. District Inspector of Schools

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Service Commission Rules, 1995 - Rule 14 and 14(1); Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : (2001)3UPLBEC2155

Act and the Rules : REGULATIONS FRAMED UNDER U.P. INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION ACT Chapter II'3. (1) The Committee of Management of every institution shall cause a … the 'College' a private managed Government aided recognized educational institution, is governed by the provisions of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, U.P. Seconday Education Services Commission Act, 1981 and Payment of Salaries Act, 1971.Three Assistant Teachers (C.T. Grade), namely, … 1981 Explanation 1 to Para 3 refers to substantive 'senior-most teacher'.THE UTTAR PRADESH, SECONDARY EDUCATION SERVICES COMMISSION RULES, 1983'Rule 4. (1) The Management shall determine and intimate to the Commission, in the proforma given in Appendix 'A' … approved ad-hoc appointments of the Petitioners in C.T. Grade initially upto March 15, 1989 (Annexure-1 to the Writ Petition). This appointment was subsequently extended upto