Advanced Search Results
Late Aratgauri C. Jhaveri (A.P. Shri Krishnalal C. Jhaveri) Vs. First ...
Gujarat
Oct-12-1992
Direct Taxation
Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 11 and 64(1)
[1993]203ITR803(Guj)
S.D. Dave, J. 1. The Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'B', while exercising the jurisdiction under s. 64(1) of the ED Act, 1953, has at the instance of the accountable person referred the undermentioned three questions for our answer and reply … any part thereof passed on the death of his widow Aratgauri C. Jhaveri under s. 11 of the ED Act, 1953 ?' '2. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLate Smt. Aratgauri C. Jhaveri (A.P. Shri Krishnalal C. Jhaveri) Vs. F ...
Gujarat
Oct-12-1992
Direct Taxation
(1993)110CTR(Guj)249
S. D. DAVE, J. :The Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench B, while exercising the jurisdiction under s. 64(1) of the ED Act, 1953, has at the instance of the accountable person referred the undermentioned three questions for our answer and reply … any part thereof passed on the death of his widow Aratgauri C. Jhaveri under s. 11 of the ED Act, 1953 ?''2. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskController of Estate Duty Vs. Ujagar Singh.
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-09-1996
Direct Taxation
(1997)137CTR(P& H)577
ASHOK BHAN, J. :This is a petition under s. 64(3) of the ED Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) filed by Controller of Estate Duty, Patiala (hereinafter referred to as the … holding that the proceedings were not commenced within the statutory period as provided under s. 73A of the ED Act, 1953 ?(ii) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Asha Rani Vs. Controller of Estate Duty.
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-23-1997
Direct Taxation
(1997)143CTR(P& H)37
us at the instance of the assessee by the Tribunal, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar under s. 64(1) of the ED Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), has evoked divergent and diametrically different views from different High Courts of … Devis case (supra), Ramratans case (supra) and P. Amirthavallis case (supra).4. Secs. 6, 7 and 39 of the ED Act, 1953, which would be relevant to the discussion, are reproduced below :'Sec. 6. Property within disposing capacity. - Property
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.V. Abdulla Vs. Income Tax Officer and anr.
Karnataka
Jun-06-1986
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961; Finance Act, 1976 - Sections 2 and 2(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19
[1986]161ITR589(KAR); [1986]161ITR589(Karn)
could be aggregated in determining the rates of Estate Duty payable by the assessees (s. 34 of the ED Act, 1953, provides for aggregation of proportion specified therein and as such aggregation the rate of Estate Duty to be … Entry 54 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to enact a provision like sub-s. 34 of the ED Act, 1953, provides for aggregation of proportion specified therein and as such aggregation the rate of Estate Duty to be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Vs. Abdulla V. Income Tax Officer and anr.
Karnataka
Jun-06-1986
Direct Taxation
(1986)56CTR(Kar)41
could be aggregated in determining the rates of Estate Duty payable by the assessees (s. 34 of the ED Act, 1953, provides for aggregation of proportion specified therein and as such aggregation the rate of Estate Duty to be … Entry 54 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to enact a provision like sub-s. 34 of the ED Act, 1953, provides for aggregation of proportion specified therein and as such aggregation the rate of Estate Duty to be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMorse Vs. Republican Party of VA.
US Supreme Court
Oct-02-1995
Land Acquisition
in the composition of the electorate that votes for a particular office. See, e. g., Allen v. State Ed. of Elections, 393 U. S. 544 , 570. By limiting the opportunity for voters to participate in the … Alleging, inter alia, that the imposition of the fee violated §§ 5 and 10 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, appellants filed a complaint seeking an injunction preventing the Party from imposing the fee and ordering
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKanchanbhai Raojibhai AmIn Vs. Union of India and ors.
Gujarat
Jan-18-1985
Direct Taxation
Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 4(3)
[1986]157ITR791(Guj)
B.K. Mehta, J.1. The petitioner, who was appointed as a valuer under section 4(3) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, is aggrieved by the decision of the respondents contained in the letter of September 12, 1983, refusing to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskController of Estate Duty, Bombay City-ii, Bombay Vs. Govindji Jethabh ...
Mumbai
Dec-12-1977
Direct Taxation
Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 5, 7 and 34(3)
[1978]115ITR664(Bom)
part of it ?'5. At the outset, it will be proper to refer to s. 5 of the ED Act, 1953, which alone, according to the revenue, is attracted in the instant case. The relevant provision in s. 5(1)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMir Barkat Ali Khan Bahadur Vs. Assistant Controller of Estate Duty
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-03-1996
Direct Taxation
Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 59 and 73A; Income Tax Act
(1996)135CTR(AP)89; [1996]222ITR672(AP)
1987 and any assessment made pursuant to notice dt. 10th Jan., 1975 issued under s. 59 of the ED Act, 1953 (for short 'the Act') as illegal and prays for a declaration to that effect. 2. The petitioner is … Act issued by the respondent which is in the following terms : 'Notice under s. 59 of the ED Act, 1953 (34 of 1953) Office of the Asstt. CED, Circle I, HyderabadNo. GIR/701/0/ Dt. 10th Jan., 1975To,Nb. Mir Barkat
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »