Advanced Search Results
Ram Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Apr-30-2004
Service
Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servant Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19(1), 21, 256 and 300A
(2004)2UPLBEC1673
15.10.1998. His son, Ram Pratap Singh (petitioner before us), sought compassionate appointment on the ground of his father 'dying-in-harness' by filing an application on 5.4.1999, addressed to Soil Conservation Officer, Sharda Nahar Pranali, Pilibhit under relevant Rules,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammad Arif Vs. Registrar, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Allahabad
Aug-25-2000
Service
Allahabad High Court Officers and Staff (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1976 - Rules 10(4) and 45
2000(4)AWC2865a
Out of which 62 vacancies were filled from the select list and two vacancies were filled under the dying-in-harness rules from the direct recruitment vacancies. Two vacancies remained unfilled. Rule 10 (4) of The Allahabad High Court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Danish Siddiqui Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Mar-03-2000
Service
Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1994; Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974 - Rule 5(1); Constitution of India - Article 16
2000(2)AWC1541; [2000(85)FLR567]; (2000)2UPLBEC1183
gave an application for giving appointment to the appellant under U. P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) on 4.11.1997. It was stated in the application that the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Rajodevi and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-11-2003
Service
Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants (Dying-in-Harness) Rules, 1974 - Rule 5
2004(3)AWC2080
the claim of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground under U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servant, Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 (in short called the 'Rules 1974' hereinafter), with further prayer commanding the respondents to provide suitable employment … petitioner's family is passing through extremely hard days and they are entitled to the beneficial protection of the Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 and denial of it is absolutely arbitrary and illegal.Paragraph 19. That even otherwise, the decision of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRohitas Sharma Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Jan-12-2001
Service
U. P. Palika Centralised Services Rules, 1966 - Rule 31; Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974
2001(1)AWC641; [2001(89)FLR574]; (2001)3UPLBEC2064
parties to issue a modified appointment order thereby indicating the fact that the petitioner is appointed under the Dying-in-Harness Rules after relaxing the conditions which come in the way of regular appointment of the petitioner.2. The petitioner's
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManoj Kumar Garg Vs. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad
Nov-09-2000
Service
U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974 - Rule 5(1)
2001(1)AWC248; [2001(88)FLR411]
He, after attaining the age of majority and qualification for the post of clerk, claimed appointment under the Dying-in-Harness Rules and applied on 31.5.2000. His claim has been rejected by District Basic Education Officer (in brief BSA) … aided institution Dayanand Vedic Vidyalaya Junior High School. Shamli, district Muzaffarnagar. He was a permanent assistant teacher. He died-in-harness on 19.11.1989. At the time of his father's death, petitioner was a minor of about 14 years. No
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Ram Pandey S/O Late Tribhuvan Pandey Vs. Senior Superintendent of ...
Allahabad
Apr-04-2006
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants (Dying in Harness) Rules, 1974 - Rule 5 and 5(1)
[2006(110)FLR86]
filed before the Superintendent of Police, Varansi to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment under the Dying in Harness Rules. On the basis of the aforesaid application, the Superintendent of Police has recommended the case of the petitioner … dated 19.3.2002 by which respondent No. 4 has rejected the claim of the petitioner for appointment under the Dying in Harness Rules.2. The facts arising out of the present writ petition are that the father of the petitioner who was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-16-2002
Service
Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants (Dying-in-Harness) Rules, 1974 - Rules 2 and 5
2003(3)AWC2224; (2003)1UPLBEC489
short question that looms large in this petition is whether the services of dependent of a Government servant dying-in-harness could be dispensed with as a sequel to the directions contained in the Government order dated 2.5.2002. 2. … addressed to Mukhya Nagar Adhikari, Nagar Nigam, Gorakhpur, the text of which was that the benefit of dying-in-harness rules would not be applicable to daily wage employees and as such appointment under dying-in-harness rules on death of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnaruddIn Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Sep-23-1998
Service
Uttar Pradesh Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Service) Rules, 1975; Dying-in-Harness Rules
1999(1)AWC204
P. Land Records Manual inPart-II. A circular was issued on15.2.1991 to the effect that suchuntrained candidates appointed underthe Dying in Harness Rules should besent for the same training as aremeant for the general candidates withthe condition that after the training … D.K. Seth, J. 1. The petitioner wasappointed in the post of Lekhpalunder the Dying-in-Harness Rules.Admittedly, though he possessed theessential qualification but he did notpossess the pre-requisitequalification for the post of Lekhpal.viz., the training.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSayoom Khan Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
May-19-2000
Service
Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants (Dying-in-Harness) Rules, 1974 - Rules 2, 3, 5, 5(1), 8 and 10; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 21
2000(4)AWC2678; [2001(89)FLR288]
has been filed by the petitioner claiming appointment under the U. P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants (Dying-in-Harness) Rules, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as Dying-in-Harness Rules) as amended uptodate. The admitted case of the petitioner is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »