Advanced Search Results

Manohar Bondade Vs. District Magistrate

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Video Casette Recorder (Regulation) Rules, 1984 - Rules 4(7), 7 and 9; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 16 and 17; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Rules

Reported in : ILR1989KAR2232; 1989(2)KarLJ499

powers to make laws. The relevant Entry-33 of List II (State List) reads as follows:-'Entry 33. Theatres, and dramatic performances; cinemas subject to the provisions of Entry 60 of List I; sports, entertainments and amusements. '28. Under Entry … in support of this argument on the provisions of Sections 16 and 17 of the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964. ('the Act').5. Sri Kamath has strenuously contended that the District Magistrate has no power to revoke or suspend … Reliance is placed in support of this argument on the provisions of Sections 16 and 17 of the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964. ('the Act').5.

T. Parameswaran Vs. the District Collector, Ernakulam and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kerala Dramatic Performances Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 295 and 295A; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1988Ker175

John Mathew, J. 1. This is an appeal filed under Section 10 of the Kerala Dramatic Performances Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The District Collector, Ernakulam who is the first respondent herein, passed … the procedure prescribed in that section as well as in R. 3 of the Kerala Dramatic Performance Rules 1964.14. Learned counsel on either side addressed elaborate arguments on the interpretation of the words 'Objectionable performance' and also … v. State of Maharashtra (1965) 1 SCR 65 : AIR 1965 SC 881 which were adopted by the Khosla Committee which recommended them for the

Karnataka Film Industry Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. State of Karn ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 3B, 4A and 5; Constitution of India - Article 14; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964; Mysore Cinematograph Shows Act, 1959; Mysore Amusements Tax Act, 1932; Government of India Act; Laws Amendment Act, 1982; Tamil Nadu Act, 1989

Reported in : AIR1995Kant397; ILR1995KAR1758; 1995(39)KarLJ431

attention to entry-33 of List-11 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution which runs as follows: 'Theatres and dramatic performances; cinemas subject to the provisions of entry 60 of List I; sports, entertainments and amusements'. He contends that … show if all the seats or accommodation as determined by the licensing authority under the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964, in respect of the place of entertainment are occupied and collected at the maximum rate of payment for … of such ticket shall be deemed to have been admitted on payment. 8 (Provided that where the seat or accommodation which the holder of such … bunch of petitions the petitioners call in question the constitutional validity of Sections 3B and 4A of the Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958 hereinafter referred

State of West Bengal and anr. Vs. Rash Behari Sarkar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : JT1993(1)SC1; 1992(3)SCALE306; (1993)1SCC479; [1992]Supp3SCR351

consent of the parties and allowed the same. The reasoning of the Division Bench, condensed by me runs thus:Dramatic performances for social, educational or scientific purposes form a class by themselves; if so, further classification among that class … notification issued on 31st March, 1984 by the Government of West Bengal, in exercise of power conferred under Section 8 of the Bengal Amusement Tax Act, 1922 (Bengal Act V of 1922) (hereinafter referred to as the Act)

Rustom Cavasjee Cooper Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Banking

Acts : Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1969 - Sections 4, 5 and 15(2); Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Ordinance, 1969; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 5, 6(1), 22 and 27; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 31 and 31(2)

Reported in : AIR1970SC564; [1970]40CompCas325(SC); (1970)1SCC248; [1970]3SCR530; 1970 INSC 18; MANU/SC/0011/1970

26 'Trade and commerce'; Entry 30 'Money-lending and money-lenders'; Entry 31 'Inns and Inn-keeping'; Entry 33 'Theatres and dramatic performances, cinemas etc.'. We are unable to accede to the argument that the State Legislature are competent to legislate … Ordinance 8 of 1969 promulgated on July 19, 1969, and the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act 22 of 1969 which replaced the Ordinance with certain modifications impair his rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 … consolidate and amend the law relating to certain matters concerning banking. By Section 5(b) of that Act, 'banking' was defined as meaning 'the accepting, for

Rivers Vs. Roadway Express, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

C. § 185(a), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 253, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 2000e et … in Runyon v. McCrary, 427 U. S. 160 , 168-170, and n. 8 (1976). 303 a supplemental brief advancing the argument that the new statute … was intended to "respond to the Supreme Court's recent decisions by restoring the civil rights protections that were dramatically limited by those decisions," S. 2104, § 2(b)(1) (emphasis added), and the section responding to Patterson was entitled … Rights Act of 1866, Rev. Stat. § 1977, 42 U. S. C. § 1981, to include "the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual

Manohar Lal Sharma Vs. Narendra Damodardas Modi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

respect of such matters Parliament has advanced the law in a manner which can only be described as dramatic by giving recognition to the principle that disclosure of information could be refused only on the foundation of … be produced, outweighs the public interest that a court of justice in performing its function should not be denied access to relevant evidence. The court … the documents cannot be accessed under the Right to Information Act in view of the provisions contained in Section 8(1)(a) of the said 3 Act. Additionally, the provisions contained in Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Vineet Dhanda Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

respect of such matters Parliament has advanced the law in a manner which can only be described as dramatic by giving recognition to the principle that disclosure of information could be refused only on the foundation of … be produced, outweighs the public interest that a court of justice in performing its function should not be denied access to relevant evidence. The court … the documents cannot be accessed under the Right to Information Act in view of the provisions contained in Section 8(1)(a) of the said 3 Act. Additionally, the provisions contained in Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Sanjay Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

respect of such matters Parliament has advanced the law in a manner which can only be described as dramatic by giving recognition to the principle that disclosure of information could be refused only on the foundation of … be produced, outweighs the public interest that a court of justice in performing its function should not be denied access to relevant evidence. The court … the documents cannot be accessed under the Right to Information Act in view of the provisions contained in Section 8(1)(a) of the said 3 Act. Additionally, the provisions contained in Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Yashwant Sinha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation Through Its Directo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

respect of such matters Parliament has advanced the law in a manner which can only be described as dramatic by giving recognition to the principle that disclosure of information could be refused only on the foundation of … be produced, outweighs the public interest that a court of justice in performing its function should not be denied access to relevant evidence. The court … the documents cannot be accessed under the Right to Information Act in view of the provisions contained in Section 8(1)(a) of the said 3 Act. Additionally, the provisions contained in Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872