Advanced Search Results

T. Parameswaran Vs. the District Collector, Ernakulam and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kerala Dramatic Performances Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 295 and 295A; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1988Ker175

John Mathew, J. 1. This is an appeal filed under Section 10 of the Kerala Dramatic Performances Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The District Collector, Ernakulam who is the first respondent herein, passed … the procedure prescribed in that section as well as in R. 3 of the Kerala Dramatic Performance Rules 1964.14. Learned counsel on either side addressed elaborate arguments on the interpretation of the words 'Objectionable performance' and also … Court in K. A. Abbas v. Union of India. (1970) 2 SCC 780 : (AIR 1971 SC 481) where the film in respect of which

Manohar Bondade Vs. District Magistrate

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Video Casette Recorder (Regulation) Rules, 1984 - Rules 4(7), 7 and 9; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 16 and 17; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Rules

Reported in : ILR1989KAR2232; 1989(2)KarLJ499

powers to make laws. The relevant Entry-33 of List II (State List) reads as follows:-'Entry 33. Theatres, and dramatic performances; cinemas subject to the provisions of Entry 60 of List I; sports, entertainments and amusements. '28. Under Entry … take action under Section 17 of the Act only in a case where a licencee is convicted under Section 7 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952, or Section 16 of the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulations) Act, 1964 or under Section … in support of this argument on the provisions of Sections 16 and 17 of the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964. ('the Act').5. Sri Kamath has strenuously contended that the District Magistrate has no power to revoke or suspend

Karnataka Film Industry Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. State of Karn ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 3B, 4A and 5; Constitution of India - Article 14; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964; Mysore Cinematograph Shows Act, 1959; Mysore Amusements Tax Act, 1932; Government of India Act; Laws Amendment Act, 1982; Tamil Nadu Act, 1989

Reported in : AIR1995Kant397; ILR1995KAR1758; 1995(39)KarLJ431

attention to entry-33 of List-11 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution which runs as follows: 'Theatres and dramatic performances; cinemas subject to the provisions of entry 60 of List I; sports, entertainments and amusements'. He contends that … show if all the seats or accommodation as determined by the licensing authority under the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964, in respect of the place of entertainment are occupied and collected at the maximum rate of payment for … pay the amount of tax every week as specified in column (3) of the table below the said Section. 7. Section 3 of the Act which regulate the levy and collection of entertainment-tax on each payment for admission

Mumbai Grahak Panchayat Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1983)85BOMLR218

was pointed out that the words 'entertainments' and 'amusements' in entry 62 are wide enough to include theatres, dramatic performances, cinemas, sports and the like. The argument there was that there is a conflict between entry 62, list … validity of the Kerala Luxury Tax on Tobacco (Validation) Act (9 of 1964). that was a legislation enacted in exercise of legislative power under entry … : [1954]26ITR758(SC) , the Supreme Court in para. 7 observed (at p. 585):It has been accepted as … raise a question about the validity of the Maharashtra Luxury-cum-Entertainment and Amusement Tax on Holders of Television Sets Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. Writ petition No. 1454 of 1982 is filed by the Mumbai … force on 1st July 1982. The charging provision in the Act is Section 3 which reads as follows:Subject to the other provisions of this Act,

Rivers Vs. Roadway Express, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

C. § 185(a), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 253, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 2000e et … § 185(a), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 253, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 2000e et seq., … was intended to "respond to the Supreme Court's recent decisions by restoring the civil rights protections that were dramatically limited by those decisions," S. 2104, § 2(b)(1) (emphasis added), and the section responding to Patterson was entitled … Rights Act of 1866, Rev. Stat. § 1977, 42 U. S. C. § 1981, to include "the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual

Rasdeep Touring Talkies Vs. District Magistrate and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Punjab Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 9; Punjab Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1952 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : AIR1967P& H219

of Entry 60 of List I' is included in Entry 33 of List II State List. 'Theatres and dramatic performances' are also included in Entry 33 of List II in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution.The various State … to be additional conditions subject to which the licence has been granted.'Section 7 provides for penalties for violation of any provisions of the Act or … Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1952, hereinafter called the Punjab Rules, framed under Section 9 of the Punjab Cinemus (Regulation) Act, 1952 (Punjab Act 11 of 1952), hereinafter referred to as the Punjab Act Before dealing with the abovesaid … licences under the Punjab Rules for various places for different periods during 1964-65.3. Solar eclipse fair is held at Kurukshetra in Karnal District after about

Sony Corp. Vs. Universal City Studios

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Court, explained: "The defendant not only expected but invoked by advertisement the use of its films for dramatic reproduction Page 464 U. S. 436 of the story. That was the most conspicuous purpose for which they … ] No issue concerning the transfer of tapes to other persons, the use of home-recorded tapes for public performances, or the copying of programs transmitted on pay or cable television systems was raised. See id. at 432-433, … in the first copyright revision bills, drafted by the Copyright Office in 1964. Page 464 U. S. 467 These bills, like the 1976 Act, granted … television programs that are broadcast on the public airwaves. Respondents brought an action against petitioners in Federal District Court, alleging that VTR consumers had been … Act is prefaced by the words "subject to sections 107 through 118." Those sections describe a variety … educational programming. For example, their survey indicated that 7.3% of all Betamax use is to record sports

California Vs. Larue

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Service Tax

could not be classified as obscene or lacking a communicative element. Held: In the context not of censoring dramatic performances in a theater, but of licensing bars and nightclubs to sell liquor by the drink, the States have … 400 U. S. 433 (1971); Hornsby v. Allen, 326 F.2d 605 (CA5 1964). I am at a loss to understand why the Twenty-first Amendment should … type of entertainment that might be presented in bars and nightclubs that it licensed. Appellees then brought this action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. … portion of his or her genitals or anus'; and, by a companion section," "(e) The displaying of films or pictures depicting acts a live performance … 409 U.S. 109 (1972) California v. LaRue No. 71-36 Argued October 10, 1972 Decided December 5, 1972

Columbus Bd. of Educ. Vs. Penick

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Education

progressed from kindergarten through high school, school systems have changed. Dayton and Columbus are both examples of the dramatic growth and change in urban school districts. [ Footnote 2/5 ] It is unrealistic Page 443 U. S. … of the Columbus defendants' predecessors. They were almost completely segregated in 1954, 1964, 1974 and today. Nothing has occurred to substantially alleviate that continuity of … local conditions and the possible need for further hearings, the courts which originally heard these cases can best perform this judicial appraisal." Brown II , 349 U.S. at 349 U. S. 299 . [ Footnote 2/3 ] … UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Syllabus This class action was brought in 1973 by students in the Columbus, Ohio, school system, … (1979) Columbus Bd. of Educ. v. Penick No. 78-610 Argued April 24, 1979 Decided July 2, 1979

institute for Inner Studies and ors. Vs. Charlotte Anderson and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

term “Pranic Healing” is publici juris and is a generic/common term. It does not constitute an original literary, dramatic and musical works and hence cannot be subject to copyright protection under the provisions of Section 13 of … also filed applications for rejection/return of plaint under the provisions of Order 7 Rule 10 and 11 CPC.7. In the following pending applications parties have … stated that they will not use any trade literature, CDs any other literary work of the master while performing PRANIC HEALING. However, the defendants state they are entitled to impart and teach PRANIC HEALING techniques at their … against the defendants in order to restrain the defendants from carrying out activities of spreading Pranic Healing teachings, techniques, practices and courses, or any other