Advanced Search Results

Manohar Bondade Vs. District Magistrate

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Video Casette Recorder (Regulation) Rules, 1984 - Rules 4(7), 7 and 9; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 16 and 17; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Rules

Reported in : ILR1989KAR2232; 1989(2)KarLJ499

powers to make laws. The relevant Entry-33 of List II (State List) reads as follows:-'Entry 33. Theatres, and dramatic performances; cinemas subject to the provisions of Entry 60 of List I; sports, entertainments and amusements. '28. Under Entry … in support of this argument on the provisions of Sections 16 and 17 of the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964. ('the Act').5. Sri Kamath has strenuously contended that the District Magistrate has no power to revoke or suspend … Reliance is placed in support of this argument on the provisions of Sections 16 and 17 of the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964. ('the Act').5.

T. Parameswaran Vs. the District Collector, Ernakulam and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kerala Dramatic Performances Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 295 and 295A; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1988Ker175

John Mathew, J. 1. This is an appeal filed under Section 10 of the Kerala Dramatic Performances Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The District Collector, Ernakulam who is the first respondent herein, passed … the procedure prescribed in that section as well as in R. 3 of the Kerala Dramatic Performance Rules 1964.14. Learned counsel on either side addressed elaborate arguments on the interpretation of the words 'Objectionable performance' and also

institute for Inner Studies and ors. Vs. Charlotte Anderson and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

term “Pranic Healing” is publici juris and is a generic/common term. It does not constitute an original literary, dramatic and musical works and hence cannot be subject to copyright protection under the provisions of Section 13 of … in the books/instruction manuals extends to the performance and preaching of Modern Pranic Healing to the public. Moreover, Section 14 of the Copyright Act, 1957 confers upon the holder of copyright, the exclusive right to ‘perform the work … any trade literature, CDs any other literary work of the master while performing PRANIC HEALING. However, the defendants state they are entitled to impart and

Karnataka Film Industry Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. State of Karn ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 3B, 4A and 5; Constitution of India - Article 14; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964; Mysore Cinematograph Shows Act, 1959; Mysore Amusements Tax Act, 1932; Government of India Act; Laws Amendment Act, 1982; Tamil Nadu Act, 1989

Reported in : AIR1995Kant397; ILR1995KAR1758; 1995(39)KarLJ431

attention to entry-33 of List-11 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution which runs as follows: 'Theatres and dramatic performances; cinemas subject to the provisions of entry 60 of List I; sports, entertainments and amusements'. He contends that … show if all the seats or accommodation as determined by the licensing authority under the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964, in respect of the place of entertainment are occupied and collected at the maximum rate of payment for … the number of viewers he has actually admitted to the Cinema hall. 14. 'ENTRY-82 of the Union List reads thus: 'Taxes on Income other than … bunch of petitions the petitioners call in question the constitutional validity of Sections 3B and 4A of the Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958 hereinafter referred

Eastern Book Company and ors. Vs. D.B. Modak and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 14, 14(1), 16F, 16F(4), 17, 51, 52 and 52(1); Uttar Pradesh Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1975; Constitution of India - Articles 10, 15, 15(4), 16(4), 29, 226, 338(3), 340(1), 341 and 342; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act - Sections 2, 2(1) and 3(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 2 and 201; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Indian Soldiers (Litigation) Act, 1925; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147; Surtax Act, 1964 - Sections 8; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B, 11D, 11E, 12A, 12B, 12C and 12D; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1983; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1984; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1994; Copyright Act, 1842

Reported in : AIR2008SC809; 2008(2)ALD1(SC); 2008(56)BLJR181; (2008)1CALLT69(SC); (2008)1CompLJ1(SC); 2008(1)JKJ41[SC]; LC2008(1)56; (2008)1MLJ361(SC); 2008(36)PTC1(SC); 2007(14)SCALE1; 2008AIRSCW49; AIR2008SC809; 2008(1)SCC1; 2008(1)LH(SC)179; 2008(2)ICC206; 2008(4)KCCRSN237

Matched in: Citation AIR2008SC809; 2008(2)ALD1(SC); 2008(56)BLJR181; (2008)1CALLT69(SC); (2008)1CompLJ1(SC); 2008(1)JKJ41[SC]; LC2008(1)56; (2008)1MLJ361(SC); 2008(36)PTC1(SC); 2007(14)SCALE1; 2008AIRSCW49; AIR2008SC809; 2008(1)SCC1; 2008(1)LH(SC)179; 2008(2)ICC206; 2008(4)KCCRSN237

V.T. Thomas Alias Toms and ors. Vs. Malayala Manorama Company Limited, ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 14, 17 and 55; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rules 5 and 33 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1988Ker291

defined in Section 2(y). It reads :(y) 'work' means any of the following works, namely --(i) a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work;(ii) a cinematograph film:(iii) a record:'A cartoon would come within Clause (i) or even possibly … employment, different considerations should apply. Plaintiff cannot claim any copyright in relation to those works. The provisions of Section 14 which give the meaning of copyright is very relevant. The cartoon would come within Clause (b) of that … the Calcutta High Court in Eastern India Motion Pictures Association v. Indian Performing Right Society Ltd.. AIR 1974 Cal 257 and of the Supreme Court … plaintiff. That is founded on Section 17(a) and (c) of the Copyright Act. An additional contention in relation to Section 17(c) was urged. The earlier

Rivers Vs. Roadway Express, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

C. § 185(a), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 253, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 2000e et … was intended to "respond to the Supreme Court's recent decisions by restoring the civil rights protections that were dramatically limited by those decisions," S. 2104, § 2(b)(1) (emphasis added), and the section responding to Patterson was entitled … Rights Act of 1866, Rev. Stat. § 1977, 42 U. S. C. § 1981, to include "the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual

Rasdeep Touring Talkies Vs. District Magistrate and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Punjab Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 9; Punjab Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1952 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : AIR1967P& H219

of Entry 60 of List I' is included in Entry 33 of List II State List. 'Theatres and dramatic performances' are also included in Entry 33 of List II in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution.The various State … the petitioner's application is based, is ultra vires Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of the Constitution. The petitioner impleaded only the District Magistrate, Karnal, and … Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1952, hereinafter called the Punjab Rules, framed under Section 9 of the Punjab Cinemus (Regulation) Act, 1952 (Punjab Act 11 of 1952), hereinafter referred to as the Punjab Act Before dealing with the abovesaid … licences under the Punjab Rules for various places for different periods during 1964-65.3. Solar eclipse fair is held at Kurukshetra in Karnal District after about

Sony Corp. Vs. Universal City Studios

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Court, explained: "The defendant not only expected but invoked by advertisement the use of its films for dramatic reproduction Page 464 U. S. 436 of the story. That was the most conspicuous purpose for which they … ] No issue concerning the transfer of tapes to other persons, the use of home-recorded tapes for public performances, or the copying of programs transmitted on pay or cable television systems was raised. See id. at 432-433, … in the first copyright revision bills, drafted by the Copyright Office in 1964. Page 464 U. S. 467 These bills, like the 1976 Act, granted … copyrighted work in copies. § 106. [ Footnote 14 ] All reproductions of the work, however, are … television programs that are broadcast on the public airwaves. Respondents brought an action against petitioners in Federal District Court, alleging that VTR consumers had been … Act is prefaced by the words "subject to sections 107 through 118." Those sections describe a variety

Columbus Bd. of Educ. Vs. Penick

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Education

progressed from kindergarten through high school, school systems have changed. Dayton and Columbus are both examples of the dramatic growth and change in urban school districts. [ Footnote 2/5 ] It is unrealistic Page 443 U. S. … of the Columbus defendants' predecessors. They were almost completely segregated in 1954, 1964, 1974 and today. Nothing has occurred to substantially alleviate that continuity of … 443 U. S. 466 been found; [ Footnote 14 ] yet a systemwide remedy had been imposed … local conditions and the possible need for further hearings, the courts which originally heard these cases can best perform this judicial appraisal." Brown II , 349 U.S. at 349 U. S. 299 . [ Footnote 2/3 ] … UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Syllabus This class action was brought in 1973 by students in the Columbus, Ohio, school system,