Advanced Search Results

Karnataka Film Industry Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. State of Karn ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 3B, 4A and 5; Constitution of India - Article 14; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964; Mysore Cinematograph Shows Act, 1959; Mysore Amusements Tax Act, 1932; Government of India Act; Laws Amendment Act, 1982; Tamil Nadu Act, 1989

Reported in : AIR1995Kant397; ILR1995KAR1758; 1995(39)KarLJ431

attention to entry-33 of List-11 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution which runs as follows: 'Theatres and dramatic performances; cinemas subject to the provisions of entry 60 of List I; sports, entertainments and amusements'. He contends that … show if all the seats or accommodation as determined by the licensing authority under the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964, in respect of the place of entertainment are occupied and collected at the maximum rate of payment for … gross collection capacity at the rate and the multiple prescribed in Column-III of the Table below the said Section. 12. It is therefore apparent that an exhibitor has in view of the provisions of Ss. 3-B and 4-A

Manohar Bondade Vs. District Magistrate

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Video Casette Recorder (Regulation) Rules, 1984 - Rules 4(7), 7 and 9; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 16 and 17; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Rules

Reported in : ILR1989KAR2232; 1989(2)KarLJ499

powers to make laws. The relevant Entry-33 of List II (State List) reads as follows:-'Entry 33. Theatres, and dramatic performances; cinemas subject to the provisions of Entry 60 of List I; sports, entertainments and amusements. '28. Under Entry … 7 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952, or Section 16 of the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulations) Act, 1964 or under Section 12 or compounded an offence under Section 13 of the Karnataka - Entertainments Tax Act. On the facts of … in support of this argument on the provisions of Sections 16 and 17 of the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964. ('the Act').5. Sri Kamath has strenuously contended that the District Magistrate has no power to revoke or suspend

T. Parameswaran Vs. the District Collector, Ernakulam and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kerala Dramatic Performances Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 295 and 295A; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1988Ker175

John Mathew, J. 1. This is an appeal filed under Section 10 of the Kerala Dramatic Performances Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The District Collector, Ernakulam who is the first respondent herein, passed … the procedure prescribed in that section as well as in R. 3 of the Kerala Dramatic Performance Rules 1964.14. Learned counsel on either side addressed elaborate arguments on the interpretation of the words 'Objectionable performance' and also … play, pantomime or other drama shall be considered as a whole : 12. From the above sections it is clear that a drama will be

Zacchini Vs. Scripps-howard Broadcasting Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioner for broadcasting his act on television than it would privilege respondent to film and broadcast a copyrighted dramatic work without liability to the copyright owner, or to film or broadcast a prize fight or a baseball … of his talents." [ Footnote 4 ] This right of "exclusive control over the publicity given to his performances" was said to be such a "valuable part of the benefit which may be attained by his talents … Ohio St.2d at 235, 351 N.E.2d at 461. [ Footnote 6 ] Section 51 of the New York Civil Rights Law (McKinney 1976) provides an … opinion." Herb v. Pitcairn, 324 U. S. 117 , 324 U. S. 125 -126 (1945). We are confident, however, that the judgment below did not

State of Kerala & Another versus Asianet Satellite Communications ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2215

Held: The expression “entertainments” is a word of general import and in common parlance, it includes cinema shows, dramatic performances, etc. - The expression ‘entertainments’ used in Entry 62 of List II does not draw a distinction between … the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution and also liable to pay service tax under provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended from time to time as a provider of a taxable service namely broadcasting service within … or organization” - Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2(c) - Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2001 … (1981) 4 SCC 675; Kodar v. State of Kerala [1975] 1 SCR 121 : (1974) 4 SCC 422; Kerala Hotel and Restaurant Association v. State

Jahar Roy (Dead) Through L.Rs. and anr. Vs. Premji Bhimji Mansata and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 1; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 45

Reported in : AIR1977SC2439; (1977)4SCC562; [1978]1SCR770; 1978(10)LC19(SC)

its exclusive use and enjoyment. The trial judge granted a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from exhibiting any dramatic performances or any performance in the theatre, or from using it. He allowed the plaintiff compensation and damages at … witness on behalf of the defendants. In his judgment dated July 14/15, 1964, the trial judge found all the issues in favour of the plaintiff … staged the drama 'Adarsh Hindu Hotel' oh October 12 and 13, 1963 and 'Nishkriti' on October 25 … by the High Court under Article 133(1) of the Constitution as it stood before the Constitution (Thirtieth Amendment) Act, 1972. Jahar Roy, defendant No. 1, died a day after the commencement of the hearing of this appeal. … was not maintainable by one partner and it was also barred under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act.6. A number of issues were framed

Rivers Vs. Roadway Express, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

C. § 185(a), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 253, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 2000e et … was intended to "respond to the Supreme Court's recent decisions by restoring the civil rights protections that were dramatically limited by those decisions," S. 2104, § 2(b)(1) (emphasis added), and the section responding to Patterson was entitled … Rights Act of 1866, Rev. Stat. § 1977, 42 U. S. C. § 1981, to include "the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual … law prohibits all race discrimination in contracts." S. Rep. No. 101-315, pp. 12-14 (1990). Congress' concern with the effects of the Patterson decision in specific

United States Vs. Allegheny-ludlum Steel Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

The decline in ownership of plain boxcars, as opposed to more sophisticated types of cars, was even more dramatic; ownership of cars over the 10-year period in question dropped 22.1%, while aggregate carrying capacity of such cars … utilization. At the conclusion of the investigatory phase of the proceeding in 1964, the Commission determined that there was a shortage of freight cars in … the relative rights of the several carriers in a joint rate. It was making a partition, and it performed a function quasi -judicial in its nature. In the case at bar, the function exercised by the Commission … direction of the owning railroad, are "reasonable" under the Esch Car Service Act of 1917 in view of the ICC's finding, for which there is … §§ 556 and 557 of the Act. Those sections, however, govern a rulemaking proceeding only when 5 … freight car ownership of Class I railroads dropped 12.4%, and aggregate carrying capacity of those railroads dropped

Dhartipakad Madan Lal Agrawal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Representation of the People Act - Sections 82; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 12, 14, 14(2) and 18; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35; Bar Councils Act; Criminal Law; High Court of Madhya Pradesh (Contempt of Court Proceedings) Rules, 1980 - Rule 12; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(2), 129 and 215

Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT131; 2000(3)MPLJ318

to appear in Court wearing a crown to argue the case. The Court cannot be converted into a dramatic or theatrical stage.'20. Taking into consideration the established facts of the present case, we hold the contemner guilty … case of P.J. Ratnam v. D.K. Kanikaram and Ors., reported in AIR 1964 SC 244, pointed out the object of a proceeding in respect of … the freedom of expressing being contemptuous becomes punishable under Article 129 of the Constitution dehors the power under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act.15. It is to be noticed that the contemner did not improve his … earlier, it is a painful duty which we are called upon to perform, more so because the contemner had no valid or good reason for

Sony Corp. Vs. Universal City Studios

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Court, explained: "The defendant not only expected but invoked by advertisement the use of its films for dramatic reproduction Page 464 U. S. 436 of the story. That was the most conspicuous purpose for which they … ] No issue concerning the transfer of tapes to other persons, the use of home-recorded tapes for public performances, or the copying of programs transmitted on pay or cable television systems was raised. See id. at 432-433, … in the first copyright revision bills, drafted by the Copyright Office in 1964. Page 464 U. S. 467 These bills, like the 1976 Act, granted … television programs that are broadcast on the public airwaves. Respondents brought an action against petitioners in Federal District Court, alleging that VTR consumers had been … Act is prefaced by the words "subject to sections 107 through 118." Those sections describe a variety … last Term, we ordered reargument, 463 U. S. 1226 (1983). We now reverse. An explanation of our