Advanced Search Results
T. Parameswaran Vs. the District Collector, Ernakulam and ors.
Kerala
Dec-17-1987
Constitution
Kerala Dramatic Performances Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 295 and 295A; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)
AIR1988Ker175
John Mathew, J. 1. This is an appeal filed under Section 10 of the Kerala Dramatic Performances Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The District Collector, Ernakulam who is the first respondent herein, passed … the procedure prescribed in that section as well as in R. 3 of the Kerala Dramatic Performance Rules 1964.14. Learned counsel on either side addressed elaborate arguments on the interpretation of the words 'Objectionable performance' and also … Antony who is the author of the drama.2. The appellant filed C.M.P. 11197/1987 to stay the operation of the order under challenge. On this application
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManohar Bondade Vs. District Magistrate
Karnataka
Apr-21-1989
Commercial
Video Casette Recorder (Regulation) Rules, 1984 - Rules 4(7), 7 and 9; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 16 and 17; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Rules
ILR1989KAR2232; 1989(2)KarLJ499
powers to make laws. The relevant Entry-33 of List II (State List) reads as follows:-'Entry 33. Theatres, and dramatic performances; cinemas subject to the provisions of Entry 60 of List I; sports, entertainments and amusements. '28. Under Entry … in support of this argument on the provisions of Sections 16 and 17 of the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964. ('the Act').5. Sri Kamath has strenuously contended that the District Magistrate has no power to revoke or suspend … Reliance is placed in support of this argument on the provisions of Sections 16 and 17 of the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964. ('the Act').5. … Television Screen through Video Cassette Recorder(Regulation) Rules, 1984.2. On 27-12-1988 at about 11.00 P.M., the Circle Inspector of Police, Davanagere, found, on a surprise check,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKarnataka Film Industry Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. State of Karn ...
Karnataka
Feb-09-1995
Other Taxes
Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 3B, 4A and 5; Constitution of India - Article 14; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964; Mysore Cinematograph Shows Act, 1959; Mysore Amusements Tax Act, 1932; Government of India Act; Laws Amendment Act, 1982; Tamil Nadu Act, 1989
AIR1995Kant397; ILR1995KAR1758; 1995(39)KarLJ431
attention to entry-33 of List-11 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution which runs as follows: 'Theatres and dramatic performances; cinemas subject to the provisions of entry 60 of List I; sports, entertainments and amusements'. He contends that … show if all the seats or accommodation as determined by the licensing authority under the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964, in respect of the place of entertainment are occupied and collected at the maximum rate of payment for … bunch of petitions the petitioners call in question the constitutional validity of Sections 3B and 4A of the Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958 hereinafter referred
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mumbai Grahak Panchayat Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jan-21-1983
Civil
(1983)85BOMLR218
was pointed out that the words 'entertainments' and 'amusements' in entry 62 are wide enough to include theatres, dramatic performances, cinemas, sports and the like. The argument there was that there is a conflict between entry 62, list … validity of the Kerala Luxury Tax on Tobacco (Validation) Act (9 of 1964). that was a legislation enacted in exercise of legislative power under entry … the amount of tax and penalty. Section. 10 provides for the rule-making power of the State Government and Section 11 provides for the power to the State Government to do anything which appears to it to be necessary … of the Maharashtra Luxury-cum-Entertainment and Amusement Tax on Holders of Television Sets Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. Writ petition No. 1454 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRivers Vs. Roadway Express, Inc.
US Supreme Court
Apr-26-1994
Land Acquisition
C. § 185(a), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 253, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 2000e et … context and elsewhere. As a result of the decision, the more than 11 million employees in firms that are not covered by Title VII lack … was intended to "respond to the Supreme Court's recent decisions by restoring the civil rights protections that were dramatically limited by those decisions," S. 2104, § 2(b)(1) (emphasis added), and the section responding to Patterson was entitled … Rights Act of 1866, Rev. Stat. § 1977, 42 U. S. C. § 1981, to include "the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRasdeep Touring Talkies Vs. District Magistrate and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-15-1965
Civil
Punjab Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 9; Punjab Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1952 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 19(1) and 19(6)
AIR1967P& H219
of Entry 60 of List I' is included in Entry 33 of List II State List. 'Theatres and dramatic performances' are also included in Entry 33 of List II in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution.The various State … used for cinematograph exhibition from any of the provisions of this Act or of any rules made thereunder.' Section 11 provides for the repeal of the 1918 Act to a certain extent and subject to certain exceptions.10. In … licences under the Punjab Rules for various places for different periods during 1964-65.3. Solar eclipse fair is held at Kurukshetra in Karnal District after about
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSony Corp. Vs. Universal City Studios
US Supreme Court
Jan-17-1984
Land Acquisition
the Court, explained: "The defendant not only expected but invoked by advertisement the use of its films for dramatic reproduction Page 464 U. S. 436 of the story. That was the most conspicuous purpose for which they … ] No issue concerning the transfer of tapes to other persons, the use of home-recorded tapes for public performances, or the copying of programs transmitted on pay or cable television systems was raised. See id. at 432-433, … in the first copyright revision bills, drafted by the Copyright Office in 1964. Page 464 U. S. 467 These bills, like the 1976 Act, granted … television programs that are broadcast on the public airwaves. Respondents brought an action against petitioners in Federal District Court, alleging that VTR consumers had been … Act is prefaced by the words "subject to sections 107 through 118." Those sections describe a variety … S. 421 (1981). We granted certiorari, 457 U.S. 1116 (1982); since we had not completed our study
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskColumbus Bd. of Educ. Vs. Penick
US Supreme Court
Jul-02-1979
Education
progressed from kindergarten through high school, school systems have changed. Dayton and Columbus are both examples of the dramatic growth and change in urban school districts. [ Footnote 2/5 ] It is unrealistic Page 443 U. S. … of the Columbus defendants' predecessors. They were almost completely segregated in 1954, 1964, 1974 and today. Nothing has occurred to substantially alleviate that continuity of … the racial separation of the schools. [ Footnote 11 ] The court generally noted that Page 443 … local conditions and the possible need for further hearings, the courts which originally heard these cases can best perform this judicial appraisal." Brown II , 349 U.S. at 349 U. S. 299 . [ Footnote 2/3 ] … UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Syllabus This class action was brought in 1973 by students in the Columbus, Ohio, school system,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCalifornia Vs. Larue
US Supreme Court
Dec-05-1972
Service Tax
could not be classified as obscene or lacking a communicative element. Held: In the context not of censoring dramatic performances in a theater, but of licensing bars and nightclubs to sell liquor by the drink, the States have … 400 U. S. 433 (1971); Hornsby v. Allen, 326 F.2d 605 (CA5 1964). I am at a loss to understand why the Twenty-first Amendment should … type of entertainment that might be presented in bars and nightclubs that it licensed. Appellees then brought this action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. … portion of his or her genitals or anus'; and, by a companion section," "(e) The displaying of films or pictures depicting acts a live performance … the prophylactic solution unreasonable. Pp. 409 U. S. 114 -119. 326 F.Supp. 348, reversed. REHNQUIST, J., delivered
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinstitute for Inner Studies and ors. Vs. Charlotte Anderson and ors.
Delhi
Jan-10-2014
MRTP
term “Pranic Healing” is publici juris and is a generic/common term. It does not constitute an original literary, dramatic and musical works and hence cannot be subject to copyright protection under the provisions of Section 13 of … rejection/return of plaint under the provisions of Order 7 Rule 10 and 11 CPC.7. In the following pending applications parties have made their respective submissions … stated that they will not use any trade literature, CDs any other literary work of the master while performing PRANIC HEALING. However, the defendants state they are entitled to impart and teach PRANIC HEALING techniques at their … against the defendants in order to restrain the defendants from carrying out activities of spreading Pranic Healing teachings, techniques, practices and courses, or any other
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »