Advanced Search Results

Employees State Insurance Corporation, Through Its Regional Director V ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Service Tax

All the provisions need to be seen with such approach. This Court has seen the schemes of Indian Dock Labourers Act, 1934, Dock Workers (Regulations of Employment) Act 1948, Dock Workers (Safety, Health and Welfare) Act, 1986 with scheme of … 12 Tally clerks and 5 foreman. It is contended that other staff, 9 in number were working at other place, but it was also involved … The appeal is filed under Section 82 of Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (in short, 'ESI Act') against judgment and order of EIC No.3/2004,

K.B. Jacob and Sons Vs. the Shipping Corporation of India Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1990)ACC397

He stated that at the time of occurrence he was the Inspector under the Indian Dock Labour Board Act 1934, at the Port of Cochin, that on the date of occurrence of the accident he was shown wire … in the ship's gear. It also provides that Stevedore will not be responsible for any accident involving other labour or persons except ship's officers and crew. Learned Counsel on the basis of these terms, argued that this … and therefore there is no scope for exclusion of period provided in Section 14 of the Limitation Act, in view of the language of Clause … In Union of India v. Scindia Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. 1973 KLT 952 a Division Bench of this Court also held that if a suit

K.B. Jacob and Sons, Stevedors, CochIn Vs. the Shipping Corporation of ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925 - Schedule - Article 3(6); Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 11

Reported in : AIR1990Ker256

He stated that at the time of occurrence he was the Inspector under the Indian Dock Labour Board Act 1934, at the Port of Cochin, that on the date of occurrence of the accident he was shown wire … in the ship's gear. It also provides that Stevedore will not be responsible for any accident involving other labour or persons except ship's officers and crew. Learned counsel on the basis of these terms, argued that this … and therefore there is no scope for exclusion of period provided in Section 14 of the Limitation Act, in view of the language of Clause … Union of India v. Scindia steam Navigation Co. Ltd., 1973 Ker LT 952 : (AIR 1974 Ker 136) a Division Bench of this Court also

Bengal Corporation Private Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner for the Port of C ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 64; ;Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 16(1) and 59; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 72

Reported in : AIR1971Cal357

Regulation 30 of Indian Dock Labourers Regulations, 1948 which have been framed under Section 5 of the Indian Dock Labourers Act, 1934. Regulation 30 (1), inter alia, provides as follows:--'No rope shall be used in hoisting or lowering unless-- (a) … stated that by reason of the aforesaid defects the said two reels of wire ropes were worth Rs. 9,477-33P and Rs. 1000/- less than what they would have been if they had been wire ropes of the

M/s Newtech Promoters And Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs. The State Of Uttar P ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

delegated without being expressly bestowed. Placing reliance on two decisions of the Queen’s Bench in Barnard Vs. National Dock Labour Board9 and Vine Vs. National Dock Labour Board10 and taking assistance thereof, learned counsel submits that the … on two decisions of the Queen’s Bench in Barnard Vs. National Dock Labour Board9 and Vine Vs. National Dock Labour Board10 and taking assistance thereof, … Board of India or Reserve Bank of India constituted under Section 3 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934).’ Notification dated 13­9­1994 issued by the Central Government reads as under: ‘In exercise of powers

The State Vs. Ardeshir B. Cursetji and Sons, Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1956)58BOMLR365

regulations 50 and 51 of the Indian Dock Labourers Regulations, 1948, framed under Section 5 of the Indian Dock Labourers Act, 1934.2. A short but an interesting question which has arisen in this ease is one of construction of regulations

Labor Board Vs. Waterman Steamship Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Education

you NMU badge or button?" "A. Yes, sir; I used to wear it on my cap, on the dock while I was working down there." "Q. Was there anything ever said to you at the Waterman Steamship … no vacancy." The chief steward of the "Bienville," employed by Waterman since 1934 and a seaman since 1918, testified that crews of ships in dry-dock … any term or condition of employment" [ Footnote 9 ] because of union activity or affiliation. These … to enforce as based on mere suspicion. Pp. 309 U. S. 207 -209. 2. The requirement of the Act that "The findings of the Board, as to the facts, if supported by evidence, shall . . . … employees' free right to select a union of their own choosing under Section 7 of the Act by refusing to grant ships' passes to representatives

Chipping and Painting Employers, Association Private Limited Vs. A.T. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 2 and 13A; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 7, 8 and 10(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1969Bom274; (1968)70BOMLR506; [1968(17)FLR324]; ILR1969Bom783

The Petitioners are an Association Limited by guarantee. Contractors who take contracts for chipping and painting in the Docks are members of the petitioners' Association.3. Pursuant to the provisions of the Dock labour (Regulation of Employment) Act, … members of the petitioners' Association.3. Pursuant to the provisions of the Dock labour (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948, the Central Government published the Unregistered Dock … Army Act, 1950 (XLVI of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (XLV of 1950) or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934 (XXXIV of 1934); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … had no jurisdiction to entertain the application of the 2nd respondent under Section 13A of the Industrial Employment (Standing orders) Act 1946 on several grounds … the Constitution of India against the order dated 9th November 1967 passed by the Presiding officer, central

Chipping and Painting Employees' Association Ltd. Vs. Zambre (A.T.) an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 7, 7(1), 8, 10, 10(1), 12, 33C, 33C(1), 33C(2) and 33C(4)

Reported in : (1968)IILLJ193Bom

The petitioners are an association limited by guarantee. Contractors who take contracts for chipping and painting in the docks are members of the petitioners' association. 3. Pursuant to the provisions of the Dock Labour (Regulation of Employment) … order dated 9 November 1967, passed by the presiding officer, Central Government Labour Court, Bombay, ordering the petitioners to reinstate respondent 2, who was a … Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934 (34 of 1934); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … was therefore, not entitled to make an application under S. 13A. (d) Section 13A merely permits a labour court to decide questions as to application

Sathiyabama and ors. Vs. M. Palanisamy and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 60; Payment of Gratuity Act - Sections 13 and 14; ;Pensions Act - Sections 11; Provident Funds Act - Sections 3 and 4; Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Propositions Act, 1952 - Sections 10(2)

Reported in : 2004(2)CTC129; (2004)IILLJ403Mad; (2004)1MLJ43

of Section 11 of the Pensions Act. 8. As regards the gratuity, in a decision reported in Calcutta Dock Labour Board v. Sandhya Mitra : (1993)IIILLJ412SC , the Supreme Court, in a case very similar to the … Section 11 of the Pensions Act. 8. As regards the gratuity, in a decision reported in Calcutta Dock Labour Board v. Sandhya Mitra : (1993)IIILLJ412SC , the Supreme Court, in a case very similar to the case … AIR (30) 1943 Nag 333 (ii) Thaj Mahomed v. Balaji Singh AIR 1934 Mad 173 (iii) Union of India v. J.C.Fund & Finance : (1976)IILLJ69SC … This being the legal position, I am bound to follow the same. 9. It is therefore clear that these amounts which are payable to employees,