Advanced Search Results

izreal Masih Vs. Sheela

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 60

Reported in : I(1994)DMC109

religion, were married at Raipur on 28-12-1981. The petitioner filed a petition under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (hereinafter called the Act) on 11-8-1989 contending that the petitioner learnt through some persons that the respondent is … illicit relations with other persons. The statement of these witnesses, according to us, is not admissible in evidence. Section 60 of the Evidence Act enacts the general English rule that hearsay is no evidence. Hearsay is the evidence

Agnel Valentine D'Souza Vs. Mrs. Blanche Agnela Piedade D'Souza

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 22 and 55; Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 - Sections 9 and 60(3)

Reported in : II(1999)DMC22

D.M. Dharmadhikari, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 55^~DIVORCE ACT, 1869~^ of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (shortly hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') filed by the husband against … nor their Counsel have explained to me what are the essential rituals of Catholic Christian marriage. Under Section 60^~CHRISTIAN MARRIAGE ACT1872~^ of Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 in accordance with which they were married, the only formality

Mrs. Vandana Fand anr. Vs. Mr. Subhash BenjamIn Borde

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 59 and 60; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 18

Reported in : 1994(4)BomCR403; I(1995)DMC183

Family Court, Pune, dated 20-3-1991. The parties to the proceedings are governed by the provisions of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 and the appellate-wife before us had filed a petition under section 18 of the Indian Divorce Act praying … College A which is running a professional course like Engineering or MBA etc. has an intake capacity of 60 seats which has duly been notified in the information brochure. However, after the cut-off date, approval is granted

Alfred Wilkinson Vs. Grace Emily Wilkinson

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1923Bom321; (1923)25BOMLR945

the basis that the parties were domiciled in England. The learned Judge said:The jurisdiction depends on the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, and so long as that Act is in force, this Court cannot decline jurisdiction. Moreover the Courts in … Norman Macleod, Kt., C.J.1. This is a reference under Section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act IV of 1869 to the High Court of Bombay for the confirmation … of English engine-drivers or clerks that they must travel to England some 6000 miles away before they could obtain any redress. This answer would mean

M. Barnard Vs. G.H. Barnard

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1928Cal657

powers conferred by the East India Councils Act, 1861, had been exceeded in the enactment of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869.15.Then Mr. Justice Pearson continues:But if that enquiry is to be made, th9n I think it is of great … and upon that footing for a space of something like 50 or 60 years, apparently, decrees for dissolution of marriage were from time to time … of the petition for dissolution of marriage in use in England. The petitioner as required by Prov. (a), Section 1, Sub-section (1) of the Statute (16 and 17 Geo. V. Ch. 40) stated in para. 9 of

K.M. Revanasiddeshwara Vs. K.M. Shylaja

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act (I of 1939), etc. The Law Commission had observed (see Third Report, para, 60): Sub-section (3) makes this Act inapplicable to suits under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. There are other acts … Sub-section (3).- Sub-section 3 of Sec.29, Limitation Act, 1908, makes the Limitation Act inapplicable to suits under the Divorce Act, 1869. There are other Acts, like the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act and the Special Marriage Act, dealing with

T. Rangaswami Vs. T. Aravindammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 12; ;Madras Hindu (Bigamy Prevention and Divorce) Act, 1949 - Sections 5; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 120

Reported in : AIR1957Mad243

Act XXV of 1955 by K. P. Saxena, page 159). 14. Under the Indian Divorce Act IV of 1869, impotency is not a ground for divorce but a ground for nullity of marriage under sections 18 and … 186 of 1952.(1a) This O. P. was filed under Section 5 of the Madras Hindu (Bigamy Prevention and Divorce) Act VI of 1949 Clause (h) which provides that either party to a marriage solemnised before or after the … Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act by Wadia and Katpitia, 1939 Edn. page 60).12. Under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, impotency is not a ground for

Municipal Corporation of City of Ahmedabad Vs. Gandhi Shantilal Girdha ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45 and 65

Reported in : AIR1961Guj196; (1961)GLR304

by calling medical experts. Similarly in Indira Gonsalves v. Joseph : AIR1953Mad858 which was a case under the Divorce Act, 1869, a certificate by a Doctor as regards potency of the respondent was sought to be relied upon and … the doctor and not the contents of a document. The opinion of the doctor must, as provided in Section 60 of the Evidence Act, be proved by the evidence of the person who holds that opinion. Section 60

Muncherji Cursetji Khambata Vs. Jessie Grant Khambata

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1935Bom5; (1934)36BOMLR1021

Vol. I of Macpherson's British Enactments in force in Native States. Among the Acts applied are the Indian Divorce Act, IV of 1869, the Special Marriage Act, III of 1872, the Indian Christian Marriage Act, XV of 1872, … condition for marriage under the Act that neither party shall have a wife or husband still living : Section 60. The Act has been held to apply only to marriage in the Christian sense : Emperor v. Maha

Premchand Hira Vs. Bai Galal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1927Bom594; (1927)29BOMLR1336

to prove that one or both of the parties were Christians. Further, under Section 2 of the Indian Divorce Act 1869, it is essential to prove that the petitioner professed the Christian religion at the date of presenting the … now been proved. This was a marriage between native Christians, and it is sufficient to refer to Sections 60 and 61 of the Indian Christian Marriage Act 1872. The latter section makes a particular certificate conclusive proof